This article will argue that the current literature on retrogaming as a practice and the retrogamer as a subject has been lacking in fully describing the variety of practices and subjects that engage with old games. Based on data collected by interviewing nine self-described Danish retrogamers, three motivations for engaging with old games, besides nostalgia, are identified. These motivations are typologized into three player types: amateur archaeologists, amateur art historians, and techno-historians. Following the analysis, it will be argued that retrogaming might be an imprecise term to encompass the many different ways that individuals engage with old games. The concepts historical play and nostalgic play are presented to alleviate this.
AchterhuisH. (2001). Introduction: American philosophies of technology. In AchterhuisH. (Eds.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 1-9). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
2.
AclandR. (2007) Introduction: Residual media. In AclandR. (Eds.), Residual media (pp. xiii-xxvii). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
3.
ArjorantaJ. (2015). Real-time hermeneutics: Meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland).
4.
AssmannA. (2008) Canon and archive. In ErllA.NünningA. (Eds.), Cultural memory studies (pp. 97-107). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
5.
BarwickJ.DearnleyJ.MuirA. (2011) Playing games with cultural heritage: A comparative case study analysis of the current status of digital game preservation. Games and Culture, 6(4), 373-390.
6.
BernardH. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Oxford: Rowman Altamira.
7.
BoymS. (2007). Nostalgia and its discontents. The Hedgehog Review, 9(2), 7-19.
CoteA., &RazJ. (2015) In-depth interviews for games research. In LankoskiP.BjörkS. (Eds.), Game research methods: An overview (pp. 93-116). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
GuffeyE. (2006). Retro: The culture of revival. London: Reaktion Books.
13.
GuinsR. (2009). Concrete and clay: The life and afterlife of E.T. the extra-terrestrial for the Atari 2600. Design and Culture, 1(3), 345-364. doi:10.2752/174967809X12556950208989
14.
GuinsR. (2014). Game after: A cultural study of video game afterlife. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
GuttenbrunnerM.BeckerC.RauberA. (2010). Keeping the game alive: evaluating strategies for the preservation of console video games. International Journal of Digital Curation, 5(1), 64-90.
16.
HeinemanD. S. (2014). Public memory and gamer identity: Retrogaming as nostalgia. Journal of Games Criticism, 1(1), 1-24.
17.
HuhtamoE. (2005) Slots of fun, slots of trouble: An archaeology of arcade gaming. In RaessensJ.GoldsteinJ. (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterView: Introduktion til et håndværk. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
19.
LangdridgeD. (2007) Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
20.
LizardiR. (2014). Mediated nostalgia: Individual memory and contemporary mass media. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
21.
LoweryZ.NiverH. (2016). Historiography. Chicago, IL: Britannica Educational Publishing.
22.
Navarro-RemesalV. (2017) Museums of failure: Fans as curators of “bad”, unreleased, and “flopped” videogames. In SwalwellM.StuckeyH.NdalianisA. (Eds.), Fans and videogames: Histories, fandom, archives (128-145). London: Routledge.
23.
NewmanJ. (2004). Videogames. London: Routledge.
24.
NewmanJ. (2005). Playing (with) videogames. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 11(1), 48-67.
25.
NewmanJ. (2009). Save the videogame The national videogame archive: Preservation, supersession and obsolescence. M/C Journal, 12(3).
26.
StuckeyH.SwalwellM.NdalianisA.de VriesD. (2015). Remembering & exhibiting games past: The popular memory archive. ToDigra, 2(1), 9-35.
SuominenJ. (2016). How to present the history of digital games: Enthusiast, emancipatory, genealogical and pathological approaches. Games and Culture, 12(6), 1-19.
29.
SuominenJ.SivulaA. (2013). Gaming legacy? Four approaches to the relation between cultural heritage and digital technology. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 6(3), 1-18.
30.
SuominenJ.SivulaA. (2016). Participatory historians in digital cultural heritage process: Monumentalization of the first finnish commercial computer game. Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media, 27. Retrieved fromhttps://refractory-journal.com/suominen-sivula/
31.
SwalwellM. (2007). The remembering and the forgetting of early digital games: From novelty to detritus and back again. Journal of Visual Culture, 6(2), 255-273.
32.
SwalwellM. (2016). Classic gaming. In GuinsR.LowoodH. (Eds.), Debugging game history (pp. 45-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
TherrienC. (2012). Video games caught up in history: Accessibility, teleological distortion and other methodological issues. In WolfM. (Ed.), Before the crash: Early videogame history (pp. 9-29). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
VerbeekP-P. (2001). Don Ihde: The technological lifeworld. In AchterhuisH. (Ed.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 119-146). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
36.
WadeA., & WebberN. (2016). A future for game historiesCogent Arts & Humanities, 3, 1-11.
