This article invites social scientists to treat video games as social institutions. Starting with a brief presentation of sociological perspectives from Parsons to Giddens on institutions, this article highlights multiple features that characterize video games as such: historicity, internalization, conflict and change, legitimating ideology, State intervention, and interdependence. Through brief examples from games such as Assassin's Creed Origins, Second Life, Far Cry 5, and Metin2, I argue that understanding video games as social institutions would considerably improve both the perspectives of digital sociology and social theory in general, through: understanding the ubiquitous elements of gamification of our material life, understanding gamer identity at the confluence of other social institutions, such as gender and sexuality, highlighting ideology and the neoliberal agenda, emphasizing gamic agency as a form of institutional control, and redefining time-oriented interactions to explain adaptation and resistance with which the play element has crossed multiple cultures and historical periods.
AcharyaS.ShuklaS.AcharyaN.VaghaJ. (2014). Role play—An effective tool to teach clinical medicine. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education, 2(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20140619111139
AdachiP. J.WilloughbyT. (2011). The effect of violent video games on aggression: Is it more than just the violence?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.002
4.
AlMubarakS. A. H. (2022). Students as policymakers and policy advocates: Role-playing evidence-based health policies. Simulation & Gaming, 54(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781221143052
5.
AndersenM.TaylorH. F. (2000). Sociology: Understanding a diverse society. Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
6.
AndersonC. A.DillK. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772–790.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
10.
BaumanZ. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
11.
BellahR. N.MarsdenR.SullivanW.SwidlerA.TiptonS. (1991). The good society. Vintage Books.
12.
BenschopY.BrounsM. (2003). Crumbling ivory towers: Academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work, and Organization, 10(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00011
13.
BergerP.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor.
14.
BosmanF. G. (2019). The sacred and the digital. Critical depictions of religions in digital games. Religions, 10(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020130
15.
BridgesT.PascoeC. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12134
CharlesA. (2009). Playing with one’s self: Notions of subjectivity and agency in digital games. Eludamos, 3(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6010
21.
ChenY.ZhangX.ShiL.YangX.LiuX.YeF.LinS. (2021). Role-playing: An effective method for clinical novitiate teaching of infectious diseases. Medical Science Educator, 31(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01031-x
22.
ConnellR. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.
23.
ConnellR. (1995). Masculinities. Polity Press.
24.
CoteA. C. (2017). “I can defend myself” women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming online. Games and Culture, 12(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015587603
25.
CoteA. C. (2018). Writing “gamers” the gendered construction of gamer identity in nintendo power (1994–1999). Games and Culture, 13(5), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015624742
26.
CurtisJ. (2020). Failures of the sociological imagination: Trump,“brexit,” and the politics of unfinished conflict. The Sociological Quarterly, 61(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1708220
27.
CypressV. Z. (2011). Cybersexuality in MMORPGs: Virtual sexual revolution untapped. Men and Masculinities, 14(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X10363256
28.
Cypress ValkyrieZ. (2011). Cybersexuality in MMORPGs: Virtual sexual revolution untapped. Men and Masculinities, 14(1), 76–96.
29.
DueP.LynchJ.HolsteinB.ModvigJ. (2003). Socioeconomic health inequalities among a nationally representative sample of danish adolescents: The role of different types of social relations. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57(9), 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.9.692
30.
DumitricaD.GadenG. (2009). Knee-High boots and six-pack abs: Autoethnographic reflections on gender and technology in second life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(3), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v1i3.323
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In MartinL.GutmanH.HuttonP. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with michel foucault (pp. 16–49). The University of Massachusetts Press.
34.
FoxJ.TangW. Y. (2014). Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.014
35.
Furuya-KanamoriL.DoiS. A. (2016). Angry birds, angry children, and angry meta-analysts: A reanalysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635599
GazzardA. (2011). Unlocking the gameworld: The rewards of space and time in videogames. Game Studies, 11(1), 9–13.
38.
GersonK. (2002). Moral dilemmas, moral strategies, and the transformation of gender: Lessons from two generations of work and family change. Gender and Society, 16(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202016001002
39.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
40.
GiddingsS. (2009). Events and collusions. A glossary for the microethnography of video game play. Games and Culture, 4(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412008325485
41.
GreenA. M. (2022). Far Cry 5, American Right-Wing Terrorism, and Doomsday Prepper Culture. Games and Culture, 17(7-8), 1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211073379
42.
Guay-BélangerD. (2022). Assembling auras: Towards a methodology for the preservation and study of video games as cultural heritage artefacts. Games and Culture, 17(5), 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211020381
HeiderD. (2009). Living virtually: Researching new worlds. Peter Lang.
45.
HellmanC. M. E.MajamäkiM. H. H. (2016). Ordinary men with extra-ordinary skills? Masculinity constructs among MMORPG-gamers. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 6(2), 90–106.
46.
HuizingaJ. (1980). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
47.
JohnsonA. G. (2000). The Blackwell Dictionary of sociology: A user's guide to sociological language (2nd ed). Wiley-Blackwell.
48.
JuulJ. (2007). Without a goal: On open and expressive games. In AtkinsB.KrzywinskaT. (Eds.), Videogame, player, text (pp. 191–203). Manchester University Press.
49.
KatzensteinM. (1998). Faithful and fearless: Moving feminist protest inside the church and military. Princeton University Press.
50.
KayeL. K.GrestyC. E.Stubbs-EnnisN. (2017). Exploring stereotypical perceptions of female players in digital gaming contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(12), 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0294
51.
KellyD.Nic Giolla EaspaigB.CastilloP. (2023). ‘You game like a girl’: Perceptions of gender and competence in gaming. Games and Culture, 18(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221077730
52.
KellyD.PomerantzS.CurrieD. H. (2006). No boundaries? Girls’ interactive, online learning about femininities. Youth and Society, 38(3), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X05283482
53.
KendallL. (1998). Are you male or female? Gender performances on muds. In O’BrienJ.HowardJ. (Eds.), In everyday inequalities: Critical inquiries (pp. 157–187). Blackwell Publishers.
KrzywinskaT. (2007). Being a determined agent in (the) world of warcraft: Text/play/ identity. In AtkinsB.KrzywinskaT. (Eds.), Videogame, player, text (pp. 101–119). Manchester University Press.
56.
LatourB. (2007). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
MäyräF. (2008). An introduction to game studies. Sage.
61.
McRaeS. (1996). Coming apart at the seams: Sex, text, and the virtual body. In ChernyL. (Ed.), Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace (pp. 242–262). Seal Press.
NakamuraL. (2012). ‘It’s a nigger in here! kill the nigger!’’: User-generated media campaigns against racism, sexism, and homophobia in digital games. In ValdiviaA. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media studies (pp. 2–15). Blackwell Publishing.
68.
NisbetR. A. (1953). The quest for community. Oxford University Press.
69.
OrmeS. (2022). Just watching”: A qualitative analysis of non-players’ motivations for video game spectatorship. New Media & Society, 24(10), 2252–2269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821989350
70.
ParsonsT. (1990). Prolegomena to a theory of social institutions. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095758
71.
PrzybylskiA. K.DeciE. L.RigbyC. S.RyanR. M. (2014). Competence-impeding electronic games and players’ aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034820
72.
ReidE. (1994). Cultural Formations in Text-Based Virtual Realities. Master’s Thesis, Australia: University of Melbourne. Retrieved from: http://www.aluluei.com/cult-form.htm. Accessed 19 December 2022.
73.
RichA. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian experience. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660. https://doi.org/10.1086/493756
74.
RogersM.GarrettC. D. (2002). Who's afraid of women's studies? Feminisms in everyday life. Altamira Press.
75.
RoscignoV. J. (2000). Family/school inequality and African American/hispanic achievement!. Social Problems, 47(2), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097201
76.
SherryJ. L. (2007). Violent video games and aggression: Why can’t we find effects? In PreissR. W.GayleB. M.BurrellN.AllenM.BryantJ. (Eds.), In mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 245–262). Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
77.
SicartM. (2020). Playing software: The role of the ludic in the software society. Information, Communication & Society, 23(14), 2081–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764078
TaylorT. L. (2008). Becoming a player: Networks, structure, and imagined futures. In KafaiY.HeeterC.DeenerJ.SunJ. (Eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender, games, and computing (pp. 51–65). The MIT Press.
WilliamsR. (2000). American Society. In BorgottaE. F.MontgomeryR. J. V. (Eds.), In encyclopedia of sociology (2nd ed., pp. 140–148). Macmillan.
85.
WongM. (2020). Hidden youth? A new perspective on the sociality of young people ‘withdrawn’in the bedroom in a digital age. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1227–1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912530
86.
YangY. (2020). What’s hegemonic about hegemonic masculinity? Legitimation and beyond. Sociological Theory, 38(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120960792
