To explore what helps and hinders long-term online community cohesion, a once strong but now withered 7-year-old guild in the online game EverQuest 2 was studied using mixed methods. It was found that the guild faced stresses on five distinct yet interrelated levels: personal, subgroup, guild, game, and company level. Strong intragroup ties can aid group cohesion but can also cause fragmenting along weaker ties if a strong subgroup leaves the guild. Continual leadership is vital, in part due to the game mechanics that give guild leaders most of the structural power over the guild. Communities may leave their space of origin but maintain ties across several other mediated spaces simultaneously. Game companies and guild leaders can control or influence some, but not all, of the stresses guilds face.
AndersonB. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.
3.
AxelssonA.-S.ReganT. (2006). Playing online. In VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 291–306). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BijkerW. E.LawJ. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
5.
BraunH.-J. (1992). Symposium on “failed innovations.”Social Studies of Science, 22, 213–230.
6.
BurtR. S. (2010). Network neighbors: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
CareyJ. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
ChenM. (2009). Social dimensions of expertise in world of warcraft players. Transformative Works and Cultures, 2. doi:10.3983/twc.2009.0072
9.
ChenM. (2012). Leet noobs: The life and death of an expert player group in World of Warcraft. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, England: Sage.
DouglasS. J. (1987). Inventing American broadcasting, 1899-1922. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
DucheneautN.MooreR. J.NickellE. (2007). Virtual “third places”: A case study of sociability in massively multiplayer games. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 129–166. doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9041-8
14.
DucheneautN.YeeN.NickellE. (2006). Alone together? Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. CHI 2006 Proceedings (pp. 407–416). Montreal, Canada. Retrieved fromhttp://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1124772.1124834
15.
DucheneautN.YeeN.NickellE.MooreR. J. (2007). The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in World of Warcraft. CHI 2007 Proceedings (pp. 839–848). Retrieved fromhttp://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240750
16.
DunbarR. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
DunbarR. (2005). The human story. London, UK: Faber & Faber.
18.
DurkheimE. (1951). Suicide. New York, NY: Free Press.
19.
EdwardsP. N. (2003). Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In MisaT. J.BreyP.FeenbergA. (Eds.), Technology and modernity (pp. 185–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
24.
GeigerR. S.RibesD. (2011). Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.455
KayeL. K.BryceJ. (2012). Putting the “fun factor” into gaming: The influence of social contexts on experiences of playing videogames. International Journal of Internet Science, 7, 23–37. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ijis.net/ijis7_1/ijis7_1_kaye_and_bryce_pre.html
29.
LessigL. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York, NY: Basic Books.
30.
MarteyR. M.ConsalvoM. (2011). Performing the looking-glass self: Avatar appearance and group identity in second life. Popular Communication, 9, 165–180.
31.
McGonigalJ. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: Penguin.
MessingerP. R.GeX.StrouliaE.LyonsK.SmirnovK.BoneM.AlbertaU. (2008). On the relationship between my avatar and myself. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1, 1–17.
34.
MisaT. (1994). Retrieving sociotechnical change from technological determinism. In SmithM. R.MarxL. (Eds.), Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 115–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
35.
MongeP. R.ContractorN. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36.
NagenborgM.HoffstadtC. (2009). A life no longer worth playing: Some remarks on in-game suicide. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 1, 83–96. doi:10.1386/jgvw.1.2.83/1
37.
NardiB.HarrisJ. (2006). Strangers and friends: Collaborative play in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 149–158). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1180875.1180898
38.
OldenburgR. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. New York, NY: Da Capo Press.
39.
OlsenW. (2004). Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In HolbornM.HaralambosM. (Eds.), Developments in sociology. Ormskirk, United Kingdom: Causeway Press.
40.
PearceC. (2009). Communities of play. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
41.
PisanY. (2007). My guild, my people: Role of guilds in massively multiplayer online games. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment (IE ’07). Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University.
42.
RejaU.ManfredaK. L.HlebecV.VehovarV. (2003). Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. Advances in Methodology and Statistics (Metodološki zvezki), 19, 159–177.
43.
RenY.KrautR.KieslerS. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28, 377–408. doi:10.1177/0170840607076007
44.
RheingoldH. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45.
SchumanH.PresserS. (1979). The open and closed question. American Sociological Review, 44, 692–712.
46.
SkoricM. M.TangS. W. H.LiaoY.PoorN. (2010). Technology as place. In AllenS. (Ed.), Rethinking communication: Keywords in communication research (pp. 151–164). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
47.
SoukupC. (2006). Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: Building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web. New Media & Society, 8, 421–440. doi:10.1177/1461444806061953
48.
StandageT. (1998). The Victorian internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century’s on-line pioneers. New York, NY: Walker.
49.
SteenF. F.GreenfieldP. M.DaviesM. S.TynesB. (2006). What went wrong with The Sims Online: Cultural learning and barriers to identification in a massively multiplayer online role-playing game. In VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 307–323). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
SteinkuehlerC.WilliamsD. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as “third places.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 885–909. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00300.x
51.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (Eds.). (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
54.
WilliamsD.DucheneautN.XiongL.ZhangY.YeeN.NickellE. (2006). From treehouse to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 1, 338–361.
55.
WorchelS.ShackelfordS. L. (1991). Groups under stress: The influence of group structure and environment on process and performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 640–647. doi:10.1177/0146167291176006
