Skraaning and Jamieson raise some interesting issues related to the response of humans to automation failures and offer a taxonomy of failure types that broadens its definition. In this commentary a further attempt to broaden the scope of automation failures is made that places failures within a sociotechnical system of multiple humans and multiple machine components including automation. A suggestion of how one might understand the system’s response to automation failures is offered and the inclusion of autonomy is raised as another complication.
CaseyS. (1998). Set Phasers on Stun and other true tales of design, technology, and human error. Aegean Publishing Co.
3.
CookeN. J.CohenM. C.FazioW. C.InderbergL. H.JohnsonC. J.LemattaG. J.PeelM.TeoA. (2022). From teams to teamness: Future directions in the science of team cognition. At the Forefront of Human Factors/Ergonomics, Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231162449.
4.
CookeN. J.GormanJ. C. (2009). Interaction-Interaction-Based Measures of Cognitive Systemsased measures of cognitive systems. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 3(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534309x433302
5.
CookeN. J.GormanJ. C.MyersC. W.DuranJ. L. (2013). Interactive Interactive team cognitioneam cognition. Cognitive Science, 37(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12009
6.
DemirM.McNeeseN. J.GormanJ.CookeN. J.MyersC.GrimmD. (2021). Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(6), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3115058
7.
GormanJ. C.DemirM.CookeN. J.GrimmD. A. (2019). Evaluating sociotechnical dynamics in a simulated remotely-piloted aircraft system: A layered dynamics approach. Ergonomics, 0(ja), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1557750
8.
O’NeillT.McNeeseN.BarronA.SchelbleB. (2022). Human–autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors, 64(5), 904–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865
9.
ReasonJ. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-30669-0.
10.
SkraaningG.JamiesonG. A. (2023). The The Failure to Grasp Automation Failureailure to grasp automation failure. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434231189375.
11.
VagiaM.TransethA. A.FjerdingenS. A. (2016). A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed?Applied Ergonomics, 53(Part A), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013.
12.
WickensC. D.LiH.SantamariaA.SebokA.SarterN. B. (2010). Stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(4), 389–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193121005400425, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
YinX.ClarkJ.JohnsonC. J.GrimmD. A.ZhouS.WongM.CauffmanS.DemirM.CookeN. J.GormanJ. C. (2022). Development of a distributed teaming scenario for future space operations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 66(1). 788–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661405, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
