Assessment of Trust in Automation in the “Real World”: Requirements for New Trust in Automation Measurement Techniques for Use by Practitioners

Abstract

Trust in automation is a foundational principle in Human Factors Engineering. An understanding of trust can help predict and alter much of human-machine interaction (HMI). However, despite the utility of assessing trust in automation in applied settings, there are inherent and unique challenges in trust assessment for those who seek to do so outside of the confines of the sterile lab environment. Because of these challenges, new approaches for trust in automation assessment need to be developed to best suit the unique demands of trust assessment in the real world. This paper lays out six requirements for these future measures: they should (1) be short, unobtrusive, and interaction-based, (2) be context-specific and adaptable, (3) be dynamic, (4) account for autonomy versus automation dependency, (5) account for task dependency, and (6) account for levels of risk. For the benefits of trust assessment to be realized in the “real world,” future research needs to leverage the existing body of literature on trust in automation while looking toward the needs of the practitioner.

Keywords

trust trust in automation trust assessment practitioner

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abarbanel

(2012). Analysis of observed chaotic data. Springer Science & Business Media.

Abbass

H. A.

(2019). Social integration of artificial intelligence: Functions, automation allocation logic and human-autonomy trust. Cognitive Computation, 11(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9619-0

Abrams

Kurtz

(2016). Joshua Brown, who died in self-driving accident, tested limits of his Tesla. The New York Times.

Ajenaghughrure

I. B.

, Da Costa Sousa

Lamas

(2020). Measuring trust with psychophysiological signals: A systematic mapping study of approaches used. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030063

Allam

Jones

D. S.

(2020). On the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the smart city network: Universal data sharing standards coupled with artificial intelligence (AI) to benefit urban health monitoring and management. Healthcare, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2020.106408

Alsaid

Lee

J. D.

Price

(2019). Moving into the loop: An investigation of drivers’ steering behavior in highly automated vehicles. Human Factors, 62(4), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819850283

Arkin

R. C.

Ulam

Wagner

A. R.

(2012). Moral decision making in autonomous systems: Enforcement, moral emotions, dignity, trust, and deception. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(3), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2173265

Arnold

K. A.

Barling

Kevin Kelloway

(2001). Transformational leadership or the iron cage: Which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(7), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006162

Awad

Dsouza

Kim

Schulz

Henrich

Shariff

Bonnefon

J. F.

Rahwan

(2018). The Moral Machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6

10.

Bahner

J. E. E.

Hüper

A. D. A. D.

Manzey

D. H.

(2008). Misuse of automated decision aids: Complacency, automation bias and the impact of training experience. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 66(9), 688–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.06.001

11.

Banks

(2020). Optimus primed: Media cultivation of robot mental models and social judgments. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00062

12.

Banks

V. A.

Eriksson

O’Donoghue

Stanton

N. A.

(2018). Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study. Applied Ergonomics, 68, 138–145. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.010

13.

Basu

Singhal

(2016). Trust dynamics in human autonomous vehicle interaction: A review of trust models. In 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium series.

14.

Beggiato

Krems

J. F.

(2013). The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006

15.

Billings

D. R.

Schaefer

K. E.

Chen

J. Y. C.

Hancock

P. A.

(2012). Human-robot interaction: Developing trust in robots. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 109–110). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364

16.

Biondi

Alvarez

Jeong

K.-A. A.

(2019). Human–Vehicle cooperation in automated driving: A multidisciplinary review and appraisal. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561792

17.

Bonnefon

J. F.

Shariff

Rahwan

(2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573–1576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654

18.

Borch

(2016). High-frequency trading, algorithmic finance and the Flash Crash: reflections on eventalization. Economy and Society, 45(3–4), 350–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1263034

19.

Bostrom

(2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

20.

Brzowski

Nathan-Roberts

(2019). Trust measurement in human–automation interaction: A systematic review. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 1595–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631462

21.

Buchholz

Kulms

Kopp

(2017). It’s (not) your fault! Blame and trust repair in human-agent cooperation. Kognitive Systeme Workshop. https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/44538

22.

Casner

S. M.

Hutchins

E. L.

(2019). What do we tell the drivers? Toward minimum driver training standards for partially automated cars. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 13(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419830901

23.

Chancey

E. T.

Bliss

J. P.

Yamani

Handley

H. A. H.

(2017). Trust and the compliance-reliance paradigm: The effects of risk, error bias, and reliability on trust and dependence. Human Factors, 59(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816682648

24.

Chancey

E. T.

Politowicz

M. S.

(2020). Designing and training for appropriate trust in increasingly autonomous advanced air mobility operations: A mental model approach version 1.

25.

Chauhan

Galwankar

Arquilla

Garg

Di Somma

El-Menyar

Krishnan

Gerber

Holland

Stawicki

(2020). Novel coronavirus (COVID-19): Leveraging telemedicine to optimize care while minimizing exposures and viral transmission. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock, 13(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS

26.

Chen

J. Y. C.

Lakhmani

S. G.

Stowers

Selkowitz

A. R.

Wright

J. L.

Barnes

(2018). Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(3), 259–282. http://doi.org/10.1080/1463922x.2017.1315750

27.

Chen

Nikolaidis

Soh

Hsu

Srinivasa

(2018). Planning with trust for human-robot collaboration. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 307–315). https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171264

28.

Chien

S.-Y.

Lewis

Sycara

Kumru

Liu

J.-S. S.

(2019). Influence of culture, transparency, trust, and degree of automation on automation use. IEEE Transactions on Human Machine Systems, 50(3), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2931755

29.

Chiou

E. K.

Lee

J. D.

(2021). Trusting automation: Designing for responsivity and resilience. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211009995

30.

Chita-Tegmark

Law

Rabb

Scheutz

(2021). Can you trust your trust measure? ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444677

31.

Choi

J. K.

Y. G.

(2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549

32.

Cohen

Parasuraman

Freeman

(1998). Trust in decision aids: A model and its training implications. Proceedings of the 1998 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 1–37.

33.

Cummings

M. L.

(2019). Adaptation of human licensing examinations to the certification of autonomous systems. In Safe, autonomous and intelligent vehicles (pp. 145–162).

34.

Davies

(2018). The Wired Guide To Self-Driving Cars. Wired, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820140406

35.

Demir

Cooke

N. J.

Amazeen

P. G.

(2018). A conceptual model of team dynamical behaviors and performance in human-autonomy teaming. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.07.029

36.

Demir

Likens

A. D.

Cooke

N. J.

Amazeen

P. G.

McNeese

N. J.

(2019). Team coordination and effectiveness in human-autonomy teaming. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 49(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2877482

37.

Demir

McNeese

N. J.

Gorman

Cooke

N. J.

Myers

Grimm

(2021). Exploration of team trust and interaction dynamics in human-autonomy teaming. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(6), 696–705. http://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2021.3115058

38.

de Visser

E. J.

Beatty

P. J.

Estepp

J. R.

Kohn

Abubshait

Fedota

J. R.

McDonald

C. G.

(2018a). Learning from the slips of others: Neural correlates of trust in automated agents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(309), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00309

39.

de Visser

E. J.

Pak

Shaw

T. H.

(2018b). From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: the importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction. Ergonomics, 61(10), 1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1457725

40.

de Visser

E. J.

Parasuraman

(2011). Adaptive aiding of human-robot teaming: Effects of imperfect automation on performance, trust, and workload. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 5(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343411410160

41.

de Visser

E. J.

Peeters

M. M. M.

Jung

M. F.

Kohn

Shaw

T. H.

Pak

Neerincx

M. A.

(2020). Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x

42.

Dzindolet

M. T.

Peterson

S. A.

Pomranky

R. A.

Pierce

L. G.

Beck

H. P.

(2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58(6), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00038-7

43.

Dzindolet

M. T.

Pierce

L. G.

Beck

H. P.

Dawe

L. A.

(2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, 44(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024494856

44.

Ebnali

Lamb

Fathi

Hulme

(2021). Virtual reality tour for first-time users of highly automated cars: Comparing the effects of virtual environments with different levels of interaction fidelity. Applied Ergonomics, 90, 103226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103226.

45.

Endsley

M. R.

(1988). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.001%0A

46.

Endsley

M. R.

(1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092898-13

47.

Eriksson

Banks

V. A.

Stanton

N. A.

(2017). Transition to Manual: comparing simulator with on- road control transitions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 102, 227–234. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.011

48.

Estepp

J. R.

de Visser

E. J.

Klosterman

S. L.

Galster

S. M.

(2018). Predicting trust calibration and workload using machine-learning classification of neurophysiological measurement during the monitoring of automation. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems.

49.

Fang

Guo

Wang

Elhoseny

Yuan

(2019). Collaborative task assignment of interconnected, affective robots towards autonomous healthcare assistant. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92(October), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.09.069

50.

Feldhütter

Gold

Hüger

Bengler

(2016). Trust in automation as a matter of media influence and experi-ence of automated vehicles. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601460

51.

Ferrin

D. L.

Cooper

C. D.

Dirks

K. T.

Kim

P. H.

(2018). Heads will roll! Routes to effective trust repair in the aftermath of a CEO transgression. Journal of Trust Research, 8(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1419877

52.

Fiore

S. M.

Wiltshire

T. J.

(2016). Technology as teammate: Examining the role of external cognition in support of team cognitive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(OCT), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01531

53.

Freedy

DeVisser

Weltman

Coeyman

(2007, May). Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration. In 2007 International symposium on collaborative technologies and systems. (pp. 106–114). IEEE.

54.

French

Duenser

Heathcote

(2018). Trust in automation: A literature review.

55.

Galdon

Wang

S. J.

(2020). From apology to compensation: A multi-level taxonomy of trust reparation for highly automated virtual assistants. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 1018). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_7

56.

Geels-Blair

Rice

Schwark

(2013). Using system-wide trust theory to reveal the contagion effects of automation false alarms and misses on compliance and reliance in a simulated aviation task. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 23(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2013.799355

57.

Ghazizadeh

Lee

J. D.

Boyle

L. N.

(2012). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology and Work, 14(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3

58.

Gilbert

(2021, June 28). An Amazon driver said she nearly lost her house and had her car repossessed with her kids’ Christmas presents inside after an algorithm suddenly fired her. Business Insider.

59.

Gillmore

Tenhundfeld

N. L.

(2020). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Evaluating Tesla’s human factors in the wild west of self-driving cars. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21229.54245

60.

Gold

Körber

Hohenberger

Lechner

Bengler

(2015). Trust in Automation – Before and After the Experience of Take-over Scenarios in a Highly Automated Vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3025–3032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.847

61.

Gorman

J. C.

Cooke

N. J.

Amazeen

P. G.

Fouse

(2012). Measuring patterns in team interaction sequences using a discrete recurrence approach. Human Factors, 54(4), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811426140

62.

Gorman

J. C.

Cooke

N. J.

Pederson

H. K.

Connor

O. O.

DeJoode

J. A.

(2005). Coordinated awareness of situation by teams (CAST): Measuring team situation awareness of a communication glitch. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(3), 274–277. http://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900313

63.

Gorman

J. C.

Demir

Cooke

N. J.

Grimm

D. A.

(2019). Evaluating sociotechnical dynamics in a simulated remotely-piloted aircraft system: A layered dynamics approach. Ergonomics, 62(5), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1557750

64.

Gottman

J. M.

(2011). The science of trust: Emotional attunement for couples. WW Norton & Company.

65.

Gottman

J. M.

Murray

J. D.

Swanson

C. C.

Tyson

Swanson

K. R.

(2005). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. MIT Press.

66.

Grimm

Demir

Gorman

J. C.

Cooke

N. J.

(2018). The complex dynamics of team situation awareness in human-autonomy teaming. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) (pp. 103–109). https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423990

67.

Gulati

(1995). Does familiarity breed trust ? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management, 38(1), 85–112. http://www.jstor.org/stable/256729

68.

Gutzwiller

R. S.

Clegg

B. A.

Smith

C. A. P.

Lewis

J. E.

Patterson

J. D.

(2013). Predicted failure alerting in a supervisory control task does not always enhance performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol.57No.1, pp. 364–368). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

69.

Hancock

P. A.

(2017). Imposing limits on autonomous systems. Ergonomics, 60(2), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1190035

70.

Hancock

P. A.

Billings

D. R.

Schaefer

K. E.

Chen

J. Y. C.

de Visser

E. J.

Parasuraman

(2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254

71.

Hancock

P. A.

Kajaks

Caird

J. K.

Chignell

M. H.

Mizobuchi

Burns

P. C.

Feng

Fernie

G. R.

Lavallière

Noy

I. Y.

Redelmeier

D. A.

Vrkljan

B. H.

(2020). Challenges to human drivers in increasingly automated vehicles. Human Factors, 62(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819900402

72.

Haring

K. S.

Watanabe

Velonaki

Tossell

C. C.

Finomore

(2018). FFAB-the form function attribution bias in human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(4), 843–851. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2851569

73.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52(C), 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

74.

Helldin

Falkman

Riveiro

Davidsson

(2013). Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI ’13, March, (pp. 210–217). https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516554

75.

Wheatley

Scialfa

C. T.

(2005). Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 690–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.007

76.

Hoff

K. A.

Bashir

(2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570

77.

Holzinger

Biemann

Pattichis

C. S.

Kell

D. B.

(2017). What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain? Ml (pp. 1–28). https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2012.660499

78.

Huberman

B. A.

Glance

N. S.

(1996). Fluctuating Efforts and Sustainable Cooperation. In Simulating organizations: Computational models of institutions and groups. MIT Press.

79.

Hurst

H. E.

(1951). Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 116(1), 770–799. http://doi.org/10.1061/taceat.0006518

80.

Israelsen

B. W.

Ahmed

N. R.

(2019). “Dave ... I can assure you ... that it’s going to be all right ...” A definition, case for, and survey of algorithmic assurances in human-autonomy trust relationships. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(6), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267338

81.

Johnson

J. D.

(2004). Type of automation failure: The effects on trust and reliance in automation. Georgia Institute of Technology.

82.

Johnson

Vignatti

Duran

(2020). Understanding human-machine teaming through interdependence analysis. In Contemporary Research (pp. 209–233). CRC Press

83.

Kaber

D. B.

(2018a). A conceptual framework of autonomous and automated agents. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(4), 406–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2017.1363314

84.

Kaber

D. B.

(2018b). Issues in human-automation interaction modeling: presumptive aspects of frameworks of types and levels of automation. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 12(1), 7–24. http://doi.org/10.1177/1555343417737203

85.

Kaltenbach

Dolgov

(2017). On the dual nature of transparency and reliability: Rethinking factors that shape trust in automation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 61(1), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601558

86.

Keele

(2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220gst.17

87.

Kendall

(2019). Apollo 11 anniversary: Could an iPhone fly me to the moon? The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/apollo-11-moon-landing-mobile-phones-smartphone-iphone-a8988351.html

88.

Khastgir

Birrell

Dhadyalla

Jennings

(2018). Calibrating trust through knowledge: Introducing the concept of informed safety for automation in vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 96, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.001

89.

Kizilcec

R. F.

(2016). How much information? Effects of transparency on trust in an algorithmic interface. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 2390–2395). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858402

90.

Kohn

S. C.

de Visser

E. J.

Wiese

Lee

Y.-C.

Shaw

T. H.

(2021). Measurement of trust in automation: A narrative review & reference guide. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977

91.

Kohn

S. C.

Quinn

Pak

de Visser

E. J.

Shaw

T. H.

(2018). Trust repair strategies with self-driving vehicles: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2(September), 1108–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621254

92.

Körber

Baseler

Bengler

(2018). Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006

93.

Körber

Bengler

(2014). Potential individual differences regarding automation effects in automated driving. In Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction - Interacción ’14, September (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1145/2662253.2662275

94.

Korosec

(2020). Tesla vehicles recognize and respond to traffic lights, stop signs with latest software update. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/27/tesla-vehicles-recognize-and-respond-to-traffic-lights-stop-signs-with-latest-software-update/

95.

Koskinen

Lyyra

Mallat

Tuunainen

V. K.

(2019). Trust and risky technologies: Aligning and coping with Tesla Autopilot. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 5777–5786).

96.

Koustanaï

Cavallo

Delhomme

Mas

(2012). Simulator training with a forward collision warning system. Human Factors, 54(5), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812441796

97.

Kraus

Scholz

Stiegemeier

Baumann

(2019). The more you know: Trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency. Human Factors, 62(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819853686

98.

Kulms

Kopp

(2019). More human-likeness, more trust? The effect of anthropomorphism on self-reported and behavioral trust in continued and interdependent human–agent cooperation. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 31–42). https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340793

99.

Langley

Meadows

Sridharan

Choi

(2017). Explainable agency for intelligent autonomous systems. In 29th AAAI Conference on Innovative Applications (IAAI-17) (pp. 4762–4763). https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.P110.201731

100.

Law

Scheutz

(2021). Trust: Recent concepts and evaluations in human-robot interaction. In Trust in human-robot interaction (pp. 27–57). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00002-2

101.

Lee

Abe

Sato

Itoh

(2021). Developing human-machine trust: Impacts of prior instruction and automation failure on driver trust in partially automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81(May), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.06.013

102.

Lee

J. D.

Kolodge

(2020). Exploring trust in self-driving vehicles through text analysis. Human Factors, 62(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819872672

103.

Lee

J. D.

Liu

S. Y.

Domeyer

DinparastDjadid

(2021). Assessing Drivers’ trust of automated vehicle driving styles with a two-part mixed model of intervention tendency and magnitude. Human Factors, 63(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819880363

104.

Lee

J. D.

Moray

(1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967392

105.

Lee

J. D.

See

K. A.

(2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392

106.

Lee

J. D.

Wickens

C. D.

Liu

Boyle

L. N.

(2017). Designing for people (3rd ed.).

107.

Levine

Simpson

(2018). Request for investigation of deceptive and unfair practices in advertising and marketing of the “autopilot” feature offered in tesla motor vehicles.

108.

Lewicki

R. J.

McAllister

D. J.

Bies

R. J.

(1998). Trust and distrust : New relationships and realities. Academy of Management, 23(3), 438–458. http://doi.org/10.2307/259288

109.

Holthausen

B. E.

Stuck

R. E.

Walker

B. N.

(2019). No risk no trust. In Proceedings of the Annual Automotive UI Conference, September (pp. 177–185). https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344525

110.

Lin

Zhang

(2018). An interview study exploring Tesla drivers’ behavioural adaptation. Applied Ergonomics, 72(October), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.006

111.

Louw

Kuo

Romano

Radhakrishnan

Lenné

M. G.

Merat

(2019). Engaging in NDRTs affects drivers’ responses and glance patterns after silent automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62(August), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.020

112.

Louw

Madigan

Carsten

O. M. J.

Merat

(2017). Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential. Injury Prevention, 23(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042155

113.

Sarter

(2019). Eye tracking: A process-oriented method for inferring trust in automation as a function of priming and system reliability. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 49(6), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2930980

114.

Lubkowski

S. D.

Lewis

B. A.

Gawron

V. J.

Gaydos

T. L.

Campbell

K. C.

Kirkpatrick

S. A.

Reagan

I. J.

Cicchino

J. B.

(2021). Driver trust in and training for advanced driver assistance systems in Real-World driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81(July), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.07.003

115.

Lyons

J. B.

Guznov

S. Y.

(2019). Individual differences in human–machine trust: A multi-study look at the perfect automation schema. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(4), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2018.1491071

116.

Lyons

J. B.

Havig

P. R.

(2014). Transparency in a human-machine context: Approaches for fostering shared awareness/intent. In International Conference on Virtual Augmented and Mixed Reality (pp. 181–190). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07458-0_18

117.

Lyons

J. B.

Stokes

C. K.

(2012). Human-human reliance in the context of automation. Human Factors, 54(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811427034

118.

Madhavan

Wiegmann

D. A.

(2007a). Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Human Factors, 49(5), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007x230154

119.

Madhavan

Wiegmann

D. A.

(2007b). Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: An integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8(4), 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500337708

120.

Madhavan

Wiegmann

D. A.

Lacson

F. C.

(2006). Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872006777724408

121.

Madison

Arestides

Harold

Gurchiek

Chang

Ries

A. J.

Tenhundfeld

N. L.

Phillips

de Visser

Tossell

(2021). The design and integration of a comprehensive measurement system to assess trust in automated driving. In Proceedings of the Annual Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS) Conference.

122.

Manzey

Reichenbach

Onnasch

(2012). Human performance consequences of automated decision aids: The impact of degree of automation and system experience. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343411433844

123.

Matsuyama

Zimmerman

Eaton

Weger

Mesmer

Tenhundfeld

N. L.

Van Bossuyt

Semmens

(2021). Determinants that influence the acceptance and adoption of mission critical autonomous systems. In Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1156

124.

Matthews

Lin

Panganiban

A. R.

Long

M. D.

(2019). Individual differences in trust in autonomous robots: Implications for transparency. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2947592

125.

Matthews

Reinerman-Jones

L. E.

(2017). Workload assessment: How to diagnose workload issues and enhance performance (1st ed.). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

126.

McBride

S. E.

Rogers

W. A.

Fisk

A. D.

(2010, September). Do younger and older adults differentially depend on an automated system?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 54No. 2, pp. 175–179. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

127.

McGuirl

J. J. M.

Sarter

N. B. N.

(2006). Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information. Human Factors, 48(4), 656–665. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872006779166334

128.

Mehta

Rice

(2016). System wide trust: A possible contagion effect. Collegiate Aviation Review, 34(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.18.100465

129.

Merat

Seppelt

Louw

Engström

Lee

J. D.

Johansson

Green

C. A.

Katazaki

Monk

Itoh

McGehee

Sunda

Unoura

Victor

Schieben

Keinath

(2019). The “Out-of-the-Loop” concept in automated driving: proposed definition, measures and implications. Cognition, Technology and Work, 21(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0525-8

130.

Merritt

S. M.

Lee

Unnerstall

J. L.

Huber

(2015a). Are well-calibrated users effective users? Associations between calibration of trust and performance on an automation-aided task. Human Factors, 57(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814561675

131.

Merritt

S. M.

Unnerstall

J. L.

Lee

Huber

(2015b). Measuring individual differences in the perfect automation schema. Human Factors, 57(5), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815581247

132.

Merritt

S. M.

Ilgen

D. R.

(2008). Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history- based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288574

133.

Miller

C. A.

(2021). Trust, transparency, explanation, and planning: Why we need a lifecycle perspective on human-automation interaction. In Trust in human-robot interaction (pp. 233–257).

134.

Mitkidis

McGraw

J. J.

Roepstorff

Wallot

(2015). Building trust: Heart rate synchrony and arousal during joint action increased by public goods game. Physiology and Behavior, 149, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.033

135.

Monfort

S. S.

Graybeal

J. J.

Harwood

A. E.

McKnight

P. E.

Shaw

T. H.

(2018). A single-item assessment for remaining mental resources: Development and validation of the Gas Tank Questionnaire (GTQ). Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(5), 530–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2017.1397228

136.

Mosier

K. L.

Skitka

L. J.

Heers

Burdick

Mosier

K. L.

Skitka

L. J.

Heers

Burdick

Field

Heers

Field

(2016). Automation bias: Decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits automation bias: Decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0801

137.

Muir

B. M.

(1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27(5–6), 527–539. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80013-5

138.

Musk

[@elonmusk]. (2021). Seeing some issues with 10.3, so rolling back to 10.2 temporarily. Please note, this is to be expected with beta

139.

National Transportation Safety Board . (2017). Highway accident report: Collision between a car operating with automated vehicle control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck near Williston, Florida, May 7, 2016. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR1702.pdf%0Ahttps://trid.trb.org/view/1485316

140.

Nayyar

Wagner

A. R.

(2018). When should a robot apologize? Understanding how timing affects human-robot trust repair. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 265–274).

141.

Nyholm

Smids

(2016). The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: An applied trolley problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(5), 1275–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9745-2

142.

Okamura

Yamada

(2018). Adaptive trust calibration for supervised autonomous vehicles. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.

143.

Okamura

Yamada

(2020). Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration. Plos One, 15(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229132

144.

Oleson

K. E.

Billings

D. R.

Kocsis

Chen

J. Y. C.

Hancock

P. A.

(2011). Antecedents of trust in human-robot collaborations. In 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, CogSIMA (pp. 175–178). https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2011.5753439

145.

Omura

Aron

Canli

(2005). Variance maps as a novel tool for localizing regions of interest in imaging studies of individual differences. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(2), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.2.252

146.

O’Neill

McNeese

Barron

Schelble

(2020). Human–autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865

147.

Onnasch

Wickens

C. D.

Manzey

D. H.

(2014). Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. Human Factors, 56(3), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813501549

148.

Pak

McLaughlin

A. C.

Bass

(2014). A multi-level analysis of the effects of age and gender stereotypes on trust in anthropomorphic technology by younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 57(9), 1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.928750

149.

Parasuraman

de Visser

E. J.

Lin

M. K.

Greenwood

P. M.

(2012). Dopamine beta hydroxylase genotype identifies individuals less susceptible to bias in computer-assisted decision making. Plos One, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039675

150.

Parasuraman

Manzey

D. H.

(2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors, 52(3), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055

151.

Parasuraman

Riley

(1997). Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886

152.

Parasuraman

Rizzo

(2007). Neuroergonomics: The brain at work (Issue 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004

153.

Parasuraman

Sheridan

T. B.

Wickens

C. D.

(2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2(2), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534308X284417

154.

Parasuraman

Sheridan

T. B. T. B.

Wickens

C. D. C. D.

(2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354

155.

Peters

(2020). Apple launches public beta of macOS Big Sur , its biggest desktop OS update in years. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/6/21356413/apple-macos-big-sur-public-beta-now-available

156.

Phillips

Ososky

Grove

Jentsch

(2011). From tools to teammates: Toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1491–1495). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551310

157.

Rempel

J. K.

Holmes

J. G.

Zanna

M. P.

(1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95

158.

Ring

P. S.

Van De Ven

A. H.

(1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130702

159.

Robinette

Howard

A. M.

Wagner

A. R.

(2015). Timing is key for robot trust repair. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 61–71). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5

160.

Robinette

Allen

Howard

A. M.

Wagner

A. R.

(2016). Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, March (pp. 101–108). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451740

161.

Rosenstein

M. T.

Collins

J. J.

De Luca

C. J.

(1993). A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 65(1–2), 117–134. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-p

162.

Rossi

Dautenhahn

Koay

K. L.

Walter

M. L.

Walters

M. L.

(2017). How the timing and magnitude of robot errors influence peoples’ trust of robots in an emergency scenario. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 526–535). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9

163.

Rovira

Mclaughlin

A. C.

Pak

High

(2019). Looking for age differences in self-driving vehicles: Examining the effects of automation reliability, driving risk, and physical impairment on trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(800), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00800

164.

Rovira

Pak

McLaughlin

(2017). Effects of individual differences in working memory on performance and trust with various degrees of automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 18(6), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2016.1252806

165.

Rupp

M. A.

Michaelis

J. R.

McConnell

D. S.

Smither

J. A.

(2018). The role of individual differences on perceptions of wearable fitness device trust, usability, and motivational impact. Applied Ergonomics, 70(February), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.005

166.

Ruscio

Ciceri

M. R.

Biassoni

(2015). How does a collision warning system shape driver’s brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 77, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.018

167.

Sadrfaridpour

Saeidi

Wang

Burke

(2016). Modeling and control of trust in human and robot collaborative manufacturing. In Robust intelligence and trust in autonomous systems (pp. 115–141).

168.

Sanders

Kaplan

Koch

Schwartz

Hancock

P. A.

(2019). The relationship between trust and use choice in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 61(4), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818816838

169.

Sanders

Oleson

K. E.

Billings

D. R.

Chen

J. Y. C.

Hancock

P. A.

(2011). A model of human-robot trust: Theoretical model development. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting (pp. 1432–1436).

170.

Satterfield

Baldwin

De Visser

Shaw

(2017). The influence of risky conditions in trust in autonomous systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 324–328). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601562

171.

Schaefer

K. E.

(2013). The perception and measurement of human-robot trust. University of Central Florida. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(73)90100-1

172.

Schaefer

K. E.

Chen

J. Y. C.

Szalma

J. L.

Hancock

P. A.

(2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human Factors, 58(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634228

173.

Schaefer

K. E.

Sanders

T. L.

Yordon

R. E.

Billings

D. R.

Hancock

P. A.

(2012). Classification of robot form: Factors predicting perceived trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1548–1552). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561308

174.

Sebok

Wickens

C. D.

(2017). Implementing lumberjacks and black swans into model-based tools to support human-automation interaction. Human Factors, 59(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816665201

175.

Shaw

Large

D. R.

Burnett

(2020). Towards future driver training: analysing human behaviour in level 3 automated cars. In Proceedings of the Ergonomics and Human Factors Annual Meeting, April.

176.

Sheridan

T. B.

(1995). Human centered automation: Oxymoron or common sense? Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1(10), 823–828. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.1995.537867

177.

Sheridan

T. B.

Parasuraman

(2000). Human versus automation in responding to failures: An expected-value analysis. Human Factors, 42(3), 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872000779698123

178.

Sjöberg

(2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00001

179.

Stuck

R. E.

Tomlinson

B. J.

Walker

B. N.

(2021). The importance of incorporating risk into human-automation trust. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1080/1463922x.2021.1975170

180.

Sycara

Sukthankar

(2006). Literature review of teamwork models. Robotics, 31, 31. https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub4/sycara_katia_2006_1/sycara_katia_2006_1.pdf

181.

Tan

H. H.

Tan

C. S. F.

(2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241–260.

182.

Tenhundfeld

N. L. .

de Visser

E. J.

Haring

K. S. .

Ries

A. J.

Finomore

V. S.

Tossell

C. C.

(2019). Calibrating trust in automation through familiarity with the autoparking feature of a Tesla Model X. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 13(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419869083

183.

Tenhundfeld

N. L.

de Visser

E. J.

Ries

A. J.

Finomore

V. S.

Tossell

C. C.

(2020). Trust and distrust of automated parking in a Tesla Model X. Human Factors, 62(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819865412

184.

Teoh

E. R.

(2019). What’s in a name? Drivers’ perceptions of the use of five SAE level 2 driving automation systems (Issue June).

185.

Tesla . (2017). Model X owner’s manual. https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/model_x_owners_manual_north_america_en.pdf

186.

Tolston

M. T.

Funke

G. J.

Alarcon

G. M.

Miller

Bowers

M. A.

Gruenwald

Capiola

(2018). Have a heart: Predictability of trust in an autonomous agent teammate through team-level measures of heart rate synchrony and arousal. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 714–715). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621162

187.

Tomzcak

Pelter

Gutierrez

Stretch

Hilf

Donadio

Tenhundfeld

N. L.

de Visser

E. J.

Tossell

C. C.

(2019). Let Tesla Park your Tesla: Driver trust in a semi-automated car. In Proceedings of the Annual Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS) Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735647

188.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

189.

Wagner

A. R.

Borenstein

Howard

A. M.

(2018a). Overtrust in the robotic age. Communications of the ACM, 61(9), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241365

190.

Wagner

A. R.

Robinette

Howard

(2018b). Modeling the human-robot trust phenomenon: A conceptual framework based on risk. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3152890

191.

Wang

Jamieson

G. A.

Hollands

J. G.

(2009). Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system. Human Factors, 51(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809338842

192.

Wang

Hussein

Rojas

R. F.

Shafi

Abbass

H. A.

(2018). EEG-based neural correlates of trust in human-autonomy interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (pp. 350–357). https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2018.8628649

193.

Webber

C. L.

Zbilut

J. P.

(1994). Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. Journal of Applied Physiology, 76(2), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1994.76.2.965

194.

Wickens

C. D.

Santamaria

Sebok

Sarter

N. B.

(2010). Stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193121005400425

195.

Wiczorek

Meyer

(2019). Effects of trust, self-confidence, and feedback on the use of decision automation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(519), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00519

196.

Wiederhold

B. K.

(2020). Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Avoiding “zoom fatigue”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(7), 437–439. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkw

197.

Wiggers

(2020). Alexa can now send driving directions to your phone on your way out the door. VentureBeat. https://venturebeat.com/2020/03/04/alexa-can-send-driving-directions-to-your-phone-on-your-way-out-the-door/

198.

Wilmer

J. B.

(2008). How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis. Spatial Vision, 21(6), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856808786451408.How

199.

Yang

X. J.

Unhelkar

V. V.

Shah

J. A.

(2017). Evaluating effects of user experience and system transparency on trust in automation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’17, Part F1271 (pp. 408–416). https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020230

200.

Zhang

Tao

Zhang

Lin

Zhang

(2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018