The objective was to identify key cognitive processes that are impaired when drivers divert attention from driving.
Background:
Driver distraction is increasingly recognized as a significant source of injuries and fatalities on the roadway.
Method/Results:
A “SPIDER” model is developed that identifies key cognitive processes that are impaired when drivers divert attention from driving. SPIDER is an acronym standing for scanning, predicting, identifying, decision making, and executing a response.
Conclusion:
When drivers engage in secondary activities unrelated to the task of driving, SPIDER-related processes are impaired, situation awareness is degraded, and the ability to safely operate a motor vehicle may be compromised.
Application:
The pattern of interference helps to illuminate the sources of driver distraction and may help guide the integration of new technology into the automobile.
BiondiF.TurrillJ. M.ColemanJ. R.CooperJ. M.StrayerD. L. (2015). Cognitive distraction impairs driver’s anticipatory glances: An on-road study. In McGeheeD. V.LeeJ. D.RizzoM. (Eds.), Driving Assessment 2015: International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 23–29). Iowa City: Public Policy Center, University of Iowa.
2.
BraverT.GrayJ.BurgessG. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In ConwayA. R. A.JarroldC.KaneM. J.MiyakeA.TowseJ. N. (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
BrownT. L.LeeJ. D.McGeheeD. V. (2001). Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Human Factors, 43, 462–482.
4.
BundesenC. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547.
5.
CairdJ. K.WillnessC. R.SteelP.ScialfaC. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1282–1293.
6.
CooperJ. M.Medeiros-WardN.StrayerD. L. (2013). The impact of eye movements and cognitive workload on lateral position variability in driving. Human Factors, 55, 1001–1014.
7.
CooperJ. M.VladisavljevicI.Medeiros-WardN.MartinP. T.StrayerD. L. (2009). Near the tipping point of traffic stability: An investigation of driving while conversing on a cell phone in simulated highway traffic of varying densities. Human Factors, 51, 261–268.
8.
CooperP. J.ZhengY. (2002). Turning gap acceptance decision-making: The impact of driver distraction. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 321–335.
9.
DursoF.RawsonK.GirottoS. (2007). Comprehension and situation awareness. In DursoF. T.NickersonR.DumaisS. T.LewandowskyS.PerfectT. (Eds.), The handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 163–194). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
10.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
11.
EndsleyM. R. (2015). Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9, 4–32.
12.
EngleR. W.KaneM. J. (2015). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 145–199.
13.
EngströmJ.JohanssonE.ÖstlundJ. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research: Part F, 8, 97–120.
14.
FisherD. L.StrayerD. L. (2014). Modeling situation awareness and crash risk. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, 5, 33–39.
15.
HarblukJ. L.NoyY.TrbovichP. L.EizenmanM. (2007). An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 372–379.
16.
HeJ.BecicE.LeeY.McCarleyJ. S. (2011). Mind wandering behind the wheel: Performance and oculomotor correlates. Human Factors, 53, 13–21.
17.
HeenanA.HerdmanC. M.BrownM. S.RobertN. (2014). Effects of conversation on situation awareness and working memory in simulated driving. Human Factors, 56, 1077–1092.
18.
HerslundM. B.JorgensenN. O. (2003). Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35, 885–891.
19.
HorreyW. J.LeschM. F.GarabetA. (2009). Dissociation between driving performance and drivers’ subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions. Journal of Safety Research, 40, 7–12.
20.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48, 196–205.
21.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D.ConsalusK. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(2), 67–78.
22.
HorswillM. S.MckennaF. P. (1999). The effect of interference on dynamic risk-taking judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 189–199.
23.
JohannsdottirK. R.HerdmanC. M. (2010). The role of working memory in supporting drivers’ situation awareness for surrounding traffic. Human Factors, 52, 663–673.
24.
KassS. J.ColeK. S.StannyC. J. (2007). Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10, 321–329.
25.
KlauerS. G.GuoF.Simons-MortonB. G.OuimentM. C.LeeS. E.DingusT. A. (2014). Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 54–59.
26.
KniplingR. R. (2015). Naturalistic driving events: No harm, no foul, no validity. In McGeheeD. V.LeeJ. D.RizzoM. (Eds.), Driving Assessment 2015: International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 196–202). Iowa City: Public Policy Center, University of Iowa.
27.
LoganG. D.CrumpM. J. C. (2011). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes. In RossB. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 1–27). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
28.
MackA.RockI. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
McCarleyJ. S.VaisM.PringleH.KramerA. F.IrwinD. E.StrayerD. L. (2004). Conversation disrupts scanning and change detection in complex visual scenes. Human Factors, 46, 424–436.
30.
McEvoyS. P.StevensonM. R.McCarttA. T.WoodwardM.HaworthC.PalamaraP.CercarelliR. (2005). Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: A case-crossover study. British Medical Journal, 331, 428–433.
31.
Medeiros-WardN.CooperJ. M.StrayerD. L. (2014). Hierarchical control and driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 953–958.
32.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2010). Crash factors in intersection-related crashes: An on-scene perspective. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811366.pdf
33.
RatcliffR.StrayerD. L. (2014). Modeling simulated driving with a one-boundary diffusion model. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 21, 577–589.
34.
ReadingerW. O.ChatziastrosA.CunninghamD. W.BülthoffH. H.CuttingJ. E. (2002). Gaze-eccentricity effects on road position and steering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 247–258.
35.
RecarteM. A.NunesL. M. (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 31–43.
36.
RedelmeierD. A.TibshiraniR. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453–458.
37.
ReimerB. (2009). Impact of cognitive task complexity on drivers’ visual tunneling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2138, 13–19.
38.
ReimerB.MehlerB.WangY.CoughlinJ. F. (2012). A field study on the impact of variations in short-term memory demands on drivers’ visual attention and driving performance across three age groups. Human Factors, 54, 454–468.
39.
ReganM. A.HallettC.GordonC. P. (2011) Driver distraction and driver inattention: Definition, relationship and taxonomy. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43, 1771–1781.
40.
ReganM. A.StrayerD. L. (2014). Towards an understanding of driver inattention: Taxonomy and theory. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, 58, 5–13.
41.
RogersS. D.KadarE. E.CostallA. (2005). Gaze patterns in the visual control of straight-road driving and braking as a function of speed and expertise. Ecological Psychology, 17, 19–38.
42.
SanbonmatsuD. M.StrayerD. L.BiondiF.BehrendsA. A.MooreS. M. (in press). Cell phone use diminishes self-awareness of impaired driving. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
43.
SanbonmatsuD. M.StrayerD. LMedeiros-WardH.WatsonJ. M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLOS ONE, 8, e54402.
44.
SimonsD. J.ChabrisC. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.
45.
StrayerD. L. (in press). Attention and driving. In FawcettJ.RiskoE. F.KingstoneA. (Eds.), The handbook of attention (pp. 423–442). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
StrayerD. L.CooperJ. M.DrewsF. A. (2004). What do drivers fail to see when conversing on a cell phone? In the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48nd Annual Meeting (pp. 2213–2217). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
47.
StrayerD. L.CooperJ. M.TurrillJ. M.ColemanJ. R.HopmanR. J. (2015). The smartphone and the driver’s cognitive workload: A comparison of Apple, Google, and Microsoft’s intelligent personal assistants. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
48.
StrayerD. L.CooperJ. M.TurrillJ.ColemanJ.Medeiros-WardN.BiondiF. (2013). Measuring cognitive distraction in the automobile. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
49.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A. (2007a). Attention. In DursoF.NickersonR.DumaisS.LewandowskyS.PerfectT. (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 29–54). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
50.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A. (2007b). Cell-phone induced inattention blindness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128–131.
51.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A. (2007c). Multi-tasking in the automobile. In KramerA.WiegmannD.KirlikA. (Eds.), Applied attention: From theory to practice (pp. 121–133). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A.JohnstonW. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-52.
53.
StrayerD. L.JohnstonW. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
54.
StrayerD. L.TurrillJ.ColemanJ.OrtizE.CooperJ. M. (2014). Measuring cognitive distraction in the automobile: II. Assessing in-vehicle voice-based interactive technologies. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
55.
TaylorT.RomanL.McFeatersK.RomoserM.BorowskyA.MerrittD. J.PollatsekA.LeeJ. D.FisherD. L. (2015). Cell phone conversations impede latent hazard anticipation while driving, with partial compensation by self-regulation in more complex driving scenarios. Amherst: Arbella Insurance Human Performance Lab, University of Massachusetts.
56.
TsaiY.ViirreE.StrychaczC.ChaseB.JungT. (2007). Task performance and eye activity: Predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 5, B176–B185.
57.
VictorT. W.HarblukJ. L.EngströmJ. A. (2005). Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 8, 167–190.
58.
WilsonM.ChattingtonM.Marple-HorvatD. E. (2008). Eye movements drive steering: Reduced eye movement distribution impairs steering and driving performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 190–202.
