HallidayAMMcDonaldWIMushinJ. Visual evoked response in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J1973; 4: 661–664.
2.
LumsdenCE. The neuropathology of multiple sclerosis. In: VinkenPJBruynG W (eds). Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol 9. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1970: 217–309.
NikoskelainenEFalckB. Dovisual evoked potentials give relevant information to the neuroophthalmological examination in optic nerve lesions?Acta Neurol Scand1982; 66: 42–57.
AsselmanPChadwickDWMarsdenCD. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain1975; 98: 261–282.
7.
CantBRHumeALShawNA. Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1978; 45: 496–504.
8.
DienerHCKochWDichgansJ. The significance of luminance on visual evoked potentials in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr1982; 231: 149–154.
9.
HennericiMWistER. A modification of the visual evoked response method involving small luminance decrements for the diagnosis of demyelinating diseases. In: CourjonJMauguiereFRevolM. (eds). Clinical Application of Evoked Potentials in Neurology. New York: Raven Press; 1982: 433–441.
10.
WaybrightEASelhorstJBSaulRF. The effect of neutral density filters on visual evoked potentials. Ann Neurol1982; 12: 112.
11.
McDonaldWIHallidayAM. Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis. Br Med Bull1977; 33: 4–9.
12.
ShawNACantBR. Age-dependent changes in the latency of the pattern visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1980; 48: 237–241.
13.
HennericiMWenzelDFreundHJ. The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain1977; 100: 119–136.
14.
MatthewsWBSmallDGSmallMPountneyE. Pattern reversal evoked visual potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1977; 40: 1009–1014.
15.
ShahrokhiFChiappaKHYoungRR. Pattern shift visual evoked responses: two hundred patients with optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol1978; 35: 65–71.
16.
ChiappaKH. Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology1980; 30: 110–123.
17.
DienerHCScheiblerH. Follow-up studies of visual potentials in multiple sclerosis evoked by checkerboard and foveal stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1980; 49: 490–496.
18.
PurvesSJLowMDGallowayJReevesB. A comparison of visual, brainstem auditory, and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci1981; 8: 15–19.
19.
BartelDRMarkandONKolarOJ. The diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis: evoked responses and spinal fluid electrophoresis. Neurology1983; 33: 611–617.
20.
JavidanMMcleanDRWarrenKG. Cerebral evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci1986; 13: 240–244.
21.
SandersEACMReulenJPHVan der VeldeEAHogenhuisLAH. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: contribution of non-clinical tests. J Neurol Sci1986; 72: 273–285.
22.
ChiappaKHRopperAH. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. N Engl J Med1982; 306: 1140–1150.
23.
GiesserBSKurtzbergDVaughanHG. Trimodal evoked potentials compared with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol1987; 44: 281–284.
24.
CouplandSGKirkhamTH. Orientation — specific visual evoked potential deficits in multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci1982; 9: 331–337.
25.
CelesiaGGDalyRF. Visual electroencephalographic computer analysis (VECA): a new electrophysiologic test for the diagnosis of optic nerve lesions. Neurology1977; 27: 637–641.
26.
MatthewsWBSmallDG. Serial recording of visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci1979; 40: 11–21.
27.
MatthewsWBSmallM. Prolonged follow-up of abnormal visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: evidence for delayed recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1983; 46: 639–642.
28.
SamorajskiT. Central neurotransmitter substances and aging: a review. J Amer Geriat Soc1977; 25: 337–348.