JonesCBlumeW.Aberrant wave forms to pattern reversal stimulation: clinical significance and electrographic “solutions.”Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1985; 61:472–481.
2.
ChiappaK.Evoked Responses in Neurophysiology (Robert S. Schwab Memorial Evoked Potential Course Syllabus). Boston, Harvard Medical Ctr; 1980:28–29.
3.
RoseAEllisonGMyersLCriteria for the clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurology1976; 26:20–22.
4.
SchumacherGBeebeGKiblerRProblems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: report by the panel on evaluation of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci1965; 122:552–568.
5.
MendellMKolkinSKisselJEvidence of central nervous system demyelination in chronic inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Neurology1987; 37:1291–1294.
6.
MarraT.Multiple sclerosis with onset after age 60. J Am Geriatr Soc1984; 32:16–18.
StockardJHughesJSharbroughF.Visually evoked potentials to electronic pattern reversal: latency variations with gender, age and technical factors. Am J EEG Technol1979; 19:171–204.
9.
ChiappaK.Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine. New York, Raven Press; 1983:71–72.
ShihPAminoffMGoodinDMantleM.Effect of reference point on visual evoked potentials: clinical relevance. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1988; 71:319–322.
12.
SpitzMEmersonRPedleyT.Dissociation of frontal N100 from occipital P100 in pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1986; 65:161–168.
13.
HammonSYiannikasC.Contribution of pattern reversal foveal and half-field stimulation to analysis of VEP abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1986; 64:101–118.