Emotion Recognition Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders as a Target of Non-invasive Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background. Social cognition deficits are a core feature of psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and mood disorder, and deteriorate the functionality of patients. However, no definite strategy has been established to treat social cognition (eg, emotion recognition) impairments in these illnesses. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature regarding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of social cognition deficits in individuals with psychiatric disorders. Methods. A literature search was conducted on English articles identified by PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, according to the guidelines of the PRISMA statement. We defined the inclusion criteria as follows: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (2) targeting patients with psychiatric disorders (included in F20-F39 of the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [ICD-10]), (3) evaluating the effect of tDCS or rTMS, (4) reporting at least one standardized social cognition test. Results. Five papers (3 articles on tDCS and 2 articles on rTMS) met the inclusion criteria which deal with schizophrenia or depression. The significant effects of tDCS or rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the emotion recognition domain were reported in patients with schizophrenia or depression. In addition, rTMS on the right inferior parietal lobe was shown to ameliorate social perception impairments of schizophrenia. Conclusions. tDCS and rTMS may enhance some domains of social cognition in patients with psychiatric disorders. Further research is warranted to identify optimal parameters to maximize the cognitive benefits of these neuromodulation methods.

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)social cognition emotion recognition RCT

Introduction

Disturbances of cognitive function are a core feature of psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, and deteriorates the functionality of patients.^1-3 For example, several domains of neurocognitive function, such as learning memory, working memory, executive functioning, verbal fluency, and attention/information processing, are profoundly affected in schizophrenia.⁴ Similarly, social cognition,⁵ ie, mental operations underlying social behavior, is impaired in schizophrenia. This aspect of the cognitive function represents a multidimensional construct that comprises emotion recognition, social perception, theory of mind (ToM), and attributional bias.⁶ Some studies report that social cognition explains the variance of functional outcome more effectively than does neurocognition.^5-8 Developmental disorders, for example autism spectrum disorder (ASD),⁹ are also associated with social cognition deficits. The amelioration of deficits in social cognition may be considered secondary to the improvement of neurocognition.¹⁰ This is because neurocognitive dysfunction is a core symptom of psychotic disorders and is more strongly associated with social function than positive or negative symptoms.¹¹

Alternatively, the neural basis of social cognition and neurocognitive function may be partially independent.¹² It is argued that improvement of social cognition directly leads to the rehabilitation of social function, whereas improvement of neurocognitive function affects the social function through the improvement of social cognition.¹³ In sum, it is legitimate to consider that the therapeutic intervention for improving social cognition may be mediated, at least in part, by alleviation of neurocognitive impairment.

To overcome social cognition impairments in psychiatric illnesses, psychosocial (eg, social cognition and interaction training)¹⁴ and pharmacological (eg, aripiprazole and risperidone)^15,16 approaches have been attempted with limited effects. As an alternative approach, some types of neuromodulation, particularly non-invasive methods, have been drawing attention, including tDCS and rTMS. rTMS delivers repeated electromagnetic pulses to induce long-lasting modulation of neural activity, while tDCS applies a weak direct electrical current (eg, 1-2 mA) through two or more electrodes placed on the scalp to modulate cortical excitability. Both brain stimulation paradigms have been shown to be effective to treat depression¹⁷ and neurocognitive impairment of schizophrenia.^18,19 Based on these observations, it would be worthwhile to evaluate the benefit of neuromodulation on social cognition in psychiatric disorders.

Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on the treatment of social cognition deficits with tDCS or rTMS in individuals with psychiatric disorders.

Materials and methods

Inclusion criteria and search strategies

This systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines.²⁰ We defined the inclusion criteria as follows: (1) RCTs, (2) targeting patients with psychiatric disorders (included in F20-F39 of ICD-10), (3) evaluating the effect of tDCS or rTMS, (4) reporting at least one standardized social cognition test, and (5) written in English. From inception to May 2, 2020, YY and TI independently conducted literature searches using the PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases. The specific search terms used for these electronic databases are included in Supplemental Material 1. TS approved the final list of included studies.

Data extraction

The information for each study was independently extracted by YY and TI with discrepancies in coding resolved by TS.

Risk of bias in individual studies

According to the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool, two independent reviewers (YY and TI) assessed (1) if patients were correctly randomized, (2) if the random allocation was properly concealed, and (3) if subjects and/or investigators and/or raters were blinded. We also assessed whether the authors collected and reported all pre-specified outcomes. A senior reviewer (TS) approved the final decision of the assessment of the risk of bias.

Results

The initial search provided a total of 374 records. After removing duplicates, 275 articles were screened, of which 25 English full texts were available. Five articles were found eligible for the systematic review. Articles describing studies that involved no sham group (n = 4), no psychiatric diagnosis (n = 9), and no social cognition outcome measures (n = 7) were excluded. The PRISMA study selection flowchart is shown in Figure 1. The summary of the risk of bias is presented in Supplemental Tables 1 and 2.

Figure 1.

Study selection flowchart, following the guidelines of the PRISMA statement.

Systematic review

The 5 studies in the current review encompassed 3 tDCS articles (see Table 1) and 2 rTMS articles (see Table 2). There were considerable differences between the studies in terms of subjects’ diagnosis, stimulation site, and outcome measures used. Among the 5 studies included in the review, 4 studies^21-24 targeted schizophrenia subjects, while one study targeted depression.²⁵ All tDCS studies^21,22,25 applied anodal stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), while one rTMS study²⁴ sets the stimulation position to the left DLPFC and one rTMS study²³ to the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) or right inferior parietal lobe (IPL).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Included tDCS Studies.

Study	Diagnosis	Sample size (active/sham)	Montage (anode/cathode)	Intensity (mA)	Duration (min)	No. of sessions	Evaluation	Outcomes	Results
Rassovsky et al²¹	Schizophrenia	37/37	F3/Fp2	2	20	2	Online	MSCEIT, TASIT, EIT, EAT	No significant effect
Brennan et al²⁵	Depression	17/17	F3/contralateral supraorbital area	1.5	30	1	Online	ERT	Significant effects in emotion recognition
Rassovsky et al²²	Schizophrenia	12/12	Fp1/Fp2	2	20	1	Online	MSCEIT, TASIT, PONS, FEIT	Significant effects in emotion recognition

Abbreviations: MSCEIT, Mayer–Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test; TASIT, the awareness of social inference test; EIT, emotion identification test; EAT, empathic accuracy task; ERT, emotion recognition task; PONS, profile of nonverbal sensitivity; FEIT, facial emotion identification test.

Each study^21,22,25 used the same parameters among active and sham groups. “Significant effects in emotion recognition” meant that stimulation enhanced the ability to identify facial emotion based on photographs or videos.^22,25

Table 2.

Characteristics of the Included rTMS Studies.^a

Study	Diagnosis	Sample size (active/sham)	Location (stimulation)	Frequency (Hz)	Intensity (%MT)	No. of stimuli (pulses)	Duration (days)	Evaluation	Outcomes	Results
Walther et al²³	Schizophrenia	20/20	Left IFG (iTBS)	30	80	600	1	Online	TULIA	No significant effect
Walther et al²³	Schizophrenia	20/20	Right IPL (cTBS)	30	100	801	1	Online	TULIA	Significant effects in social perception
Wölwer et al²⁴	Schizophrenia	18/14	Left DLPFC	10	110	1,000	10	Within 12 h after stimulation	Pictures of facial affect	Significant effects in emotion recognition

Abbreviations: rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; iTBS, intermittent theta burst stimulation; TULIA, test of upper limb apraxia; IPL, inferior parietal lobe; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Sham stimulation was performed with a sham coil system without a magnetic field in Walther et al²³ and Wölwer et al²⁴ studies. Otherwise, these studies^23,24 used the same parameters among active and sham groups. “Significant effects in social perception” meant that stimulation enhanced the ability to assess the accuracy of performance of hand gestures.²³ “Significant effects in emotion recognition” meant that stimulation enhanced the ability to identify facial emotion based on photographs or videos.²⁴

Two tDCS studies^21,22 employed a current intensity of 2 mA, while one²⁵ used 1.5 mA. In addition, one study applied tDCS for 30 min, while the remaining ones applied stimulation for 20 min (n = 2). All tDCS studies except one²¹ used single-session designs, and all employed online-stimulation protocol (ie, outcome measures were assessed during active/placebo tDCS).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures identified through the specific search strategy in this study were discussed in relation to four domains of social cognition, ie, emotion recognition, social perception, ToM, and attributional bias (see Table 3).

Table 3.

Social Cognitive Outcomes Eligible for the Systematic Review.

Study	Neuromodulation technique	Emotion recognition	Social perception	ToM	Attributional bias
Rassovsky et al²¹	tDCS	MSCEIT, EIT, EAT	—	TASIT	—
Brennan et al²⁵	tDCS	ERT	—	—	—
Rassovsky et al²²	tDCS	MSCEIT, FEIT	PONS	TASIT	—
Walther et al²³	rTMS	—	TULIA	—	—
Wölwer et al²⁴	rTMS	Pictures of facial affect	—	—	—

Abbreviations: ToM, theory of mind; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation; MSCEIT, Mayer–Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test; EIT, emotion identification test; EAT, empathic accuracy task; TASIT, the awareness of social inference test; ERT, emotion recognition task; FEIT, facial emotion identification test; PONS, profile of nonverbal sensitivity; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; TULIA, test of upper limb apraxia.

Emotion recognition

The Mayer–Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT)²⁶ has 141 items and 8 ability subtests, which assess 4 components of emotional processing, ie, the ability to perceive, use, understand, and regulate emotions. On the other hand, the emotion identification test (EIT) and facial EIT (FEIT) are tests in which participants need to identify facial emotion based on photographs from the software.²⁷ In the pictures of facial affect,²⁸ participants need to answer the name of emotion shown on each face from a multiple-choice list of the six emotions (anger, disgust, happiness, sadness, surprise, and fear) based on 30 digital photographs of faces.

The empathic accuracy task (EAT)²⁹ assesses whether participants judge positive or negative empathy by using 12 video clips (6 positive and 6 negative events). The emotion recognition task (ERT)³⁰ used computer-generated video clips (using real actors) to assess the ability of participants to recognize specific emotions through facial expressions (anger, disgust, happiness, sadness, surprise, and fear).

Social perception

The profile of nonverbal sensitivity (PONS)³¹ is used to assess social perception, linked to social interaction,²³ using scenes with facial expressions, voice intonations, and/or bodily gestures. The test of upper limb apraxia (TULIA)³² was used to assess the accuracy of performance of 48 hand gestures (meaningless, intransitive, or transitive), half of which are performed on demonstration of the experimenter (imitation), whereas the other half are performed following verbal instructions (pantomime).

ToM

The awareness of social inference test (TASIT)³³ is 16 videotaped ToM tasks to understand the actors’ communicative intentions, by answering whether actors wanted to make participants believe the literal or non-literal meaning of their messages.

Effects of neuromodulation for social cognitive deficits

Effects of tDCS

Three studies included in the systematic review used tDCS. The characteristics of the included RCTs are shown in Table 1. Two studies included patients with schizophrenia, while one included depression. There were 3 patterns of tDCS montage in which the anode and the cathode were placed: (1) F3/Fp2, (2) F3/contralateral supraorbital area, and (3) Fp1/Fp2 of the international 10-20 electroencephalography system. Two studies used a 2 mA current intensity, while one used a 1.5 mA protocol. The duration of the intervention lasted from 20 to 30 min, and 2 studies adopted single-session-online protocols. ToM (n = 2) and emotion recognition (n = 3) were the most frequently evaluated social cognition outcomes, while social perception was evaluated in one study, which used PONS. Among 3 tDCS studies, two of which found significant effects only in emotion recognition, one of which targeted depression²⁵ and the other targeted schizophrenia,²² as shown in Table 1.

Effects of rTMS

Two studies (one high-frequency rTMS study and one theta burst stimulation study) were included in the systematic review. Both studies targeted patients with schizophrenia.^23,24

A single-session continuous theta burst stimulation over right IPL showed statistically significant effects on social perception, as assessed by the TULIA.²³ Multi-session high-frequency rTMS over left DLPFC showed statistically significant effects on emotional recognition, as assessed by the pictures of facial affects.²⁴

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to investigate the impact of tDCS and rTMS on social cognitive dysfunctions in psychiatric disorders. Specifically, 3 RCTs showed a significant effect of tDCS and rTMS targeting the left DLPFC on the emotion recognition domain (eg, identification of facial emotion based on photographs or videos) in patients with schizophrenia^22,24 or depression.²⁵ In addition, rTMS on the right IPL ameliorated social perception (eg, ability to assess the accuracy of performance of hand gestures) impairments of schizophrenia.²³ These findings are clinically meaningful in that social cognition deficits greatly affect the functional outcomes in individuals with psychiatric disorders, especially schizophrenia and mood disorder.^6-8,34 In this discussion below, we focus on emotional recognition and ToM, because the domains of social cognition are widely diverse.

The majority of studies (n = 4) used stimulation on the frontal areas, ie, the left DLPFC, which resulted in limited effects. The neural network of social cognition consists of the orbitofrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, and amygdala, whose functional connectivity is decreased in most of the psychiatric disorders.³⁵ Among them, the amygdala plays a key role in emotion recognition,³⁶ while the prefrontal cortices are strongly associated with the ToM.³⁷ On the other hand, the superior temporal sulcus is related to both domains of social cognition.³⁸ These lines of evidence may provide a clue to the identification of novel stimulation sites, for example T3 or T4 of the international 10-20 electroencephalography system, to maximize cognition-enhancing effects of neuromodulation.

Some mechanisms have been hypothesized to underlie the ability of tDCS.³⁹ For example, tDCS-anodal stimulation is considered to enhance the excitatory synaptic transmission by enhancing the effect of glutamate neurotransmission^40-42 and suppressing the effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid transmission in the cortex.⁴³ On the other hand, it may regulate the activity of the dopamine nervous system,⁴⁴ enhance serotonin neurotransmission,⁴⁵ and suppress acetylcholine neurotransmission.⁴⁶ As a result, there is a possibility that tDCS alters the balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs, which may also modify the activity level of multiple network systems.⁴⁷

These hypotheses about the mechanism of action of tDCS may explain the benefit for emotion recognition in schizophrenia and mood disorder. For example, the functional connectivity of the frontoparietal network and interhemispheric connectivity is reported to be decreased in these disorders, which compromises social cognition.^3,48,49 In this review, two patterns of anodal stimulation site placed F3 and Fp1 of the international 10-20 electroencephalography system have been reported to improve emotion recognition.^22,25 Therefore, anodal stimulation on the prefrontal cortex may enhance social cognition^50-52 by modifying functional connectivity in the frontoparietal network.

The neural basis of impairment of social cognitive function in ASD may be different from that of schizophrenia or mood disorder. This may be related to the lack of improvement in social cognition in ASD subjects stimulated on CP6 of the international 10-20 electroencephalography system.⁵³ Therefore, further scrutiny of stimulation sites is warranted to effectively alleviate social cognition disturbances of developmental disorders.

Similar mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain the cognitive change induced by rTMS. The basic principle of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is that most neuronal axons that receive magnetic stimulation would become electrically excited, trigger action potential, and change synaptic plasticity. Moreover, low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS inhibits cortical excitability resulting in a lasting decrease in synaptic efficacy. On the other hand, high-frequency (5-20 Hz) rTMS produces an increase in cortical excitability resulting in a persistent enhancement in synaptic strength, which can facilitate cognitive function.^54,55 This mechanism of action of high-frequency rTMS was supported in the present review of studies on psychosis.^24,56 These neural events are associated with synaptic changes, most likely through long-term potentiation.^57-59 Further study is warranted to examine neural substrates mediating the ability of rTMS/TMS to enhance social cognition in psychiatric disorders.

In conclusion, neuromodulation for social cognition deficits is a developing field, especially in terms of the effect of intervention and mechanism of action, which deserves further research.

Limitations

There is heterogeneity in the experimental design and stimulation protocols for the current review. For example, several variables, such as diagnosis, stimulation site, intensity, duration, and outcome measures may potentially affect the results. Moreover, multiple-session-offline stimulation protocols may be required to attain social cognitive improvement⁶⁰ although almost all studies examined in this review used single-session-online stimulation protocols. Results from this systematic review of studies so far conducted may not provide conclusive evidence for the effectiveness of tDCS or rTMS on social cognition in psychiatric disorders. Further research is warranted to identify optimal parameters to maximize the cognitive benefits of tDCS and rTMS.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-eeg-10.1177_1550059421991688 - Supplemental material for Emotion Recognition Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders as a Target of Non-invasive Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-eeg-10.1177_1550059421991688 for Emotion Recognition Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders as a Target of Non-invasive Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review by Yuji Yamada, Takuma Inagawa, Naotsugu Hirabayashi and Tomiki Sumiyoshi in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Drs Kazuyuki Nakagome, Shinsuke Kito, Aya Shirama, and Takamasa Noda, as well as Mrs Kazuki Sueyoshi and Ayumu Wada, and Ms. Yumi Hasegawa at the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry for supporting our research activity.

Author Contributions

YY, TI, and TS planned the study. YY designed it and drafted the first manuscript. YY and TI independently searched and assessed the literature. TS approved the final list of included studies. TI, NH, and TS critically reviewed the draft and revised it. All authors made substantial contributions and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant No. 20K16635, Intramural Research Grant (30-1) for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP to YY, JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 20H03610, Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Comprehensive Research on Persons with Disabilities, AMED (0307081 and 0307099), and Intramural Research Grants (30-1, 30-8, 2-3) for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP and JH 2020-B-08 to TS.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

ORCID iD

Yuji Yamada

References

Green

. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153(3):321-330.

Burdick

Goldberg

Harrow

. Neurocognitive dysfunction and psychosocial outcome in patients with bipolar I disorder at 15-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;122(6):499-506.

Yamada

Matsumoto

Iijima

Sumiyoshi

. Specificity and continuity of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: relation to biomarkers. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(2):191-200.

Fioravanti

Bianchi

Cinti

. Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: an updated metanalysis of the scientific evidence. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:64.

Couture

Penn

Roberts

. The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: a review. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32:S44-S63.

Penn

Sanna

Roberts

. Social cognition in schizophrenia: an overview. Schizophr Bull. 2008;34(3):408-411.

Fett

Viechtbauer

Dominguez

Penn

van Os

Krabbendam

. The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(3):573-588.

Green

Olivier

Crawley

Penn

Silverstein

. Social cognition in schizophrenia: recommendations from the measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia new approaches conference. Schizophr Bull. 2005;31(4):882-887.

Reichow

Volkmar

. Social skills interventions for individuals with autism: evaluation for evidence-based practices within a best evidence synthesis framework. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40(2):149-166.

10.

Green

Hellemann

Horan

, et al. From perception to functional outcome in schizophrenia: modeling the role of ability and motivation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 69(12):1216-1224.

11.

Green

Kern

Braff

Mintz

. Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the ‘right stuff’? Schizophr Bull. 2000; 26(1):119-136.

12.

Pinkham

Penn

Perkins

Lieberman

. Implications for the neural basis of social cognition for the study of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(5):815-824.

13.

Brekke

Kay

Lee

Green

. Biosocial pathways to functional outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005;80(2-3):213-225.

14.

Kurtz

Richardson

. Social cognitive training for schizophrenia: a meta-analytic investigation of controlled research. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(5):1092-1104.

15.

Hill

Bishop

Palumbo

Sweeney

. Effect of second-generation antipsychotics on cognition: current issues and future challenges. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;10(1):43-57.

16.

Kucharska-Pietura

Mortimer

. Can antipsychotics improve social cognition in patients with schizophrenia? CNS Drugs. 2013;27(5):335-343.

17.

Mutz

Vipulananthan

Carter

Hurlemann

CHY

Young

. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;364:11079.

18.

Yang

Khalifa

Völlm

. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2018;48:737-750.

19.

Kostova

Cecere

Thut

Uhlhaas

. Targeting cognition in schizophrenia through transcranial direct current stimulation: A systematic review and perspective. Schizophr Res 2020 Jun;220:300-310.

20.

Liberati

Altman

Tetzlaff

, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1-e34.

21.

Rassovsky

Dunn

Wynn

, et al. Single transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia: randomized, cross-over study of neurocognition, social cognition, ERPs, and side effects. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197023.

22.

Rassovsky

Dunn

Wynn

, et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on social cognition in schizophrenia: a preliminary study. Schizophr Res. 2015;165(2-3):171-174.

23.

Walther

Kunz

Müller

, et al. Single session transcranial magnetic stimulation ameliorates hand gesture deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46(2):286-293.

24.

Wölwer

Lowe

Brinkmeyer

, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves facial affect recognition in schizophrenia. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(4):559-563.

25.

Brennan

McLoughlin

O’Connell

, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances emotion recognition in depressed patients and controls. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017;39(4):384-395.

26.

Caruso

Mayer

Salovey

. Relation of an ability measure of emotional intelligence to personality. J Pers Assess. 2002;79(2):306-320.

27.

Ekman

. Subtle Expression Training Tool (SETT) & Micro Expression Training Tool (METT). Paul Ekman; 2004, www.paulekman.com.

28.

Ekman

Friesen

. Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1976.

29.

Lee

Zaki

Harvey

Ochsner

Green

. Schizophrenia patients are impaired in empathic accuracy. Psychol Med. 2011;41(11):2297-2304.

30.

Montagne

Kessels

De Haan

Perrett

. The emotion recognition task: a paradigm to measure the perception of facial emotional expressions at different intensities. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;104(2):589-598.

31.

Ambady

Hallahan

Rosenthal

. On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1995; 69:519-529.

32.

Vanbellingen

Kersten

Van Hemelrijk

, et al. Comprehensive assessment of gesture production: a new test of upper limb apraxia (TULIA). Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(1):59-66.

33.

McDonald

Flanagan

Rollins

. The Awareness of Social Inference Test. Thames Valley Test Company Limited; 2002.

34.

Yamada

Inagawa

Sueyoshi

, et al. Social cognition deficits as a target of early intervention for psychoses: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:333.

35.

Frith

. Social cognition in humans. Curr Biol. 2007;17(16):R724-R732.

36.

Adolphs

Tranel

. Amygdala damage impairs emotion recognition from scenes only when they contain facial expressions. Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41:1281-1289.

37.

Baron-Cohen

Ring

Moriarty

Schmitz

Costa

Ell

. Recognition of mental state terms. Br J Psychiatry. 1994; 165(5):640-649.

38.

Brunet-Gouet

Decety

. Social brain dysfunctions in schizophrenia: a review of neuroimaging studies. Psychiatry Res. 2006; 148(2-3):75-92.

39.

Yamada

Sumiyoshi

. Neurobiological mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation for psychiatric disorders; Neurophysiological, chemical, and anatomical considerations. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:631838.

40.

Nitsche

Fricke

Henschke

, et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol. 2003;553:293-301.

41.

Nitsche

Jaussi

Liebetanz

Lang

Tergau

Paulus

. Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29(8):1573-1578.

42.

Nitsche

Grundey

Liebetanz

Lang

Tergau

Paulus

. Catecholaminergic consolidation of motor cortical neuroplasticity in humans. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(11):1240-1245.

43.

Stagg

Best

Stephenson

, et al. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29(16):5202-5206.

44.

Nitsche

Lampe

Antal

, et al. Dopaminergic modulation of long-lasting direct current-induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23(6):1651-1657.

45.

Nitsche

Kuo

Karrasch

Wächter

Liebetanz

Paulus

. Serotonin affects transcranial direct current-induced neuroplasticity in humans. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(5):503-508.

46.

Kuo

Grosch

Fregni

Paulus

Nitsche

. Focusing effect of acetylcholine on neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci. 2007;27(52):14442-14447.

47.

Okun

Lampl

. Instantaneous correlation of excitation and inhibition during ongoing and sensory-evoked activities. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(5):535-537.

48.

Baker

Holmes

Masters

, et al. Disruption of cortical association networks in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:109-118.

49.

Hoptman

Zuo

X-N

D’Angelo

, et al. Decreased interhemispheric coordination in schizophrenia: a resting state fMRI study. Schizophr Res. 2012;141:1-7.

50.

Keeser

Meindl

Bor

, et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci. 2011;31:15284-15293.

51.

Peña-Gómez

Sala-Lonch

Junqué

, et al. Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Stimulat. 2012;5:252-263.

52.

Stagg

Nitsche

. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Rev J Bringing Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry 2011;17:37-53.

53.

Esse Wilson

Trumbo

Wilson

Tesche

. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) for social cognition and social skills in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018;125(12):1857-1866.

54.

Pascual-Leone

Grafman

Hallett

. Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science. 1994;263(5151):1287-1289.

55.

Sandrini

Umiltà

Rusconi

. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: a new synthesis of methodological issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(3):516-536.

56.

Zhong

Gan

, et al. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for methamphetamine use disorders: a randomised clinical trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;175:84-91.

57.

Huerta

Volpe

. Transcranial magnetic stimulation, synaptic plasticity and network oscillations. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:7.

58.

Dayan

Censor

Buch

Sandrini

Cohen

. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(7):838-844.

59.

Huang

Edwards

Rounis

Bhatia

Rothwell

. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45(2):201-206.

60.

Narita

Stickley

DeVylder

, et al. Effect of multi-session prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2020;216:367-373.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB