An elevated theta/beta ratio in the EEG has long been observed among individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The theta/beta ratio was previously hypothesised to be an index of arousal, but a number of studies failed to find any association between the ratio and indices of arousal, instead proposing that the theta/beta ratio may actually be indicative of cognitive processing. This hypothesis was tested by Clarke et al using a sample of healthy adults, with results indicating that the theta/beta ratio correlated with a marker of cognitive processing (P300 latency in an auditory oddball task), while P300 amplitude correlated with an arousal marker (alpha power). The aim of this study was to test whether similar results could be found in a sample of 41 adults with the combined type of ADHD. EEGs were recorded during an eyes-closed resting condition and an auditory oddball task. Results demonstrated that the theta/beta ratio correlated significantly with P300 latency. Absolute alpha power did not correlate significantly with P300 amplitude or P300 latency. These results support the hypotheses that the theta/beta ratio is a marker of cognitive processing capacity in both the general population and in participants with ADHD, and that the alpha/arousal linkage is anomalous in ADHD.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
2.
PolanczykGde LimaMSHortaBLBiedermanJRohdeLA.The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:942-948.
3.
SimonVCzoborPBálintSMészárosABitterI.Prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194:204-211. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.048827
4.
BarryRJClarkeARJohnstoneSJ. A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. qualitative and quantitative electroencephalography. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:171-183. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00362-0
5.
SatterfieldJHDawsonME.Electrodermal correlates of hyperactivity in children. Psychophysiology. 1971;8:191-197. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1971.tb00450.x
6.
SatterfieldJHLesserLISaulRECantwellDP.EEG aspects in the diagnosis and treatment of minimal brain dysfunction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1973;205:274-282. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb43185.x
7.
LubarJF.Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1991;16:201-225. doi:10.1007/BF01000016
8.
BarryRJClarkeARMcCarthyRSelikowitzMRushbyJAPloskovaE.EEG differences in children as a function of resting-state arousal level. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:402-408. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00343-2
9.
BarryRJRushbyJAWallaceMJClarkeARJohnstoneSJZlojutroI.Caffeine effects on resting-state arousal. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2693-2700. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.008
10.
BarryRJClarkeARJohnstoneSJMcCarthyRSelikowitzM.Electroencephalogram theta/beta ratio and arousal in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence of independent processes. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:398-401. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.027
11.
AndreassiJL.Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physio-logical Response. London, England: Psychology Press; 2010.
12.
HobbsMJClarkeARBarryRJMcCarthyRSelikowitzM.EEG abnormalities in adolescent males with AD/HD. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:363-371. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.10.013
13.
Markovska-SimoskaSPop-JordanovaN.Quantitative EEG in children and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: comparison of absolute and relative power spectra and theta/beta ratio. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2017;48:20-32. doi:10.1177/1550059416643824
14.
RangaswamyMPorjeszBChorlianDB, et al. Beta power in the EEG of alcoholics. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:831-842. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01362-8
15.
ClarkeARBarryRJKaramacoskaDJohnstoneSJ.The EEG theta/beta ratio: a marker of arousal or cognitive processing capacity?Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2019;44:123-129. doi:10.1007/s10484-018-09428-6
16.
DodinVNandrinoJL.Cognitive processing of anorexic patients in recognition tasks: an event-related potentials study. Int J Eat Disord. 2003;33:299-307. doi:10.1002/eat.10145
17.
FournierLRScheffersMKColesMGAdamsonAAbadEV.When complexity helps: an electrophysiological analysis of multiple feature benefits in object perception. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000;104:119-142. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00014-7
18.
JaušovecNJaušovecK.Correlations between ERP parameters and intelligence: a reconsideration. Biol Psychol. 2000;55:137-154. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00076-4
19.
BarryRJKirkaikulSHodderD.EEG alpha activity and the ERP to target stimuli in an auditory oddball paradigm. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000;39:39-50. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00114-8
20.
CarpJComptonRJ.Alpha power is influenced by performance errors. Psychophysiology. 2009;46:336-343. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00773.x
21.
DavidsonRJJacksonDCLarsonCL. Human electroencephalography. In: CacioppoJTTassinaryLGBernstonGG, eds. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2000:27-52.
22.
De BlasioFMBarryRJ.Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013;89:9-17. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.04.018
23.
BarryRJClarkeARMcCarthyRSelikowitzMMacDonaldBDupuyFE.Caffeine effects on resting-state electrodermal levels in AD/HD suggest an anomalous arousal mechanism. Biol Psychol. 2012;89:606-608. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.01.004
24.
BauermeisterJJMatosMReinaG, et al. Comparison of the DSM-IV combined and inattentive types of ADHD in a school-based sample of Latino/Hispanic children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005;46:166-179. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00343.x
25.
ClarkeARBarryRJMcCarthyRSelikowitzM.EEG analysis in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comparative study of two subtypes. Psychiatry Res. 1998;81:19-29. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(98)00072-9
26.
ClarkeARBarryRJMcCarthyRSelikowitzM.Age and sex effects in the EEG: Differences in two subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:815-826. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00487-4
27.
ClarkeARBarryRJMcCarthyRSelikowitzM.Electro-encephalogram differences in two subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychophysiology. 2001;38:212-221. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3820212
28.
DerefinkoKJAdamsZWMilichRFillmoreMTLorchEPLynamDR.Response style differences in the inattentive and combined subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008;36:745-758. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9207-3
29.
LemiereJWoutersHSterkenCLagaeLSonuga-BarkeEDanckaertsM.Are children with ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes different in terms of aspects of everyday attention?Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;19:679-685. doi:10.1007/s00787-010-0105-9
30.
LaheyBBApplegateBMcBurnettK, et al. DMS-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1673-1685. doi:10.1176/ajp.151.11.1673
31.
ConnersKCErhardtDSparrowEP.Conners’ Adult AD/HD Rating Scales: Technical Manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc; 1999.
32.
IntriligatorJPolichJ.On the relationship between background EEG and the P300 event-related potential. Biol Psychol. 1994;37:207-218. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(94)90003-5
33.
IntriligatorJPolichJ.On the relationship between EEG and ERP variability. Int J Psychophysiol. 1995;20:59-74. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(95)00028-Q
34.
JasiukaitisPHakeremG.The effect of prestimulus alpha activity on the P300. Psychophysiology. 1988;25:157-165. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00979.x
35.
De BlasioFMBarryRJSteinerGZ.Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013;89:444-450. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.015
36.
PribramKHMcGuinnessD.Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. Psychol Rev. 1975;82:116-149. doi:10.1037/h0076780
37.
VaezMousaviSMBarryRJRushbyJClarkeAR.Evidence for differentiation of arousal and activation in normal adults. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2007;67:179-186.
38.
HalawaIFEl SayedBBAminORMeguidNAKaderAAA. Frontal theta/beta ratio changes during TOVA in Egyptian ADHD children. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2017;22:287-291. doi:10.17712/nsj.2017.4.20170067
39.
van Dongen-BoomsmaMLansbergenMMBekkerEM, et al. Relation between resting EEG to cognitive performance and clinical symptoms in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2010;469:102-106.
40.
ZhangDWRoodenrysSLiH, et al. Atypical interference control in children with AD/HD with elevated theta/beta ratio. Biol Psychol. 2017;128:82-88. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.0098
41.
ShiTLiXSongJ, et al. EEG characteristics and visual cognitive function of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Brain Dev. 2012;34:806-811. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2012.02.013
42.
FriedmanNPMiyakeA.The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004;133:101-135. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
43.
MenonVAdlemanNEWhiteCDGloverGHReissAL.Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001;12:131-143. doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200103)12:3<131::AID-HBM1010>3.0.CO;2-C
