Abstract
Objective. To assess the utility of simultaneous scalp EEG in patients with focal epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG evaluation after a detailed presurgical testing, including an inpatient scalp video EEG evaluation. Methods. Patients who underwent simultaneous scalp and intracranial EEG (SSIEEG) monitoring were classified into group 1 or 2 depending on whether the seizure onset zone was delineated or not. Seizures were analyzed using the following 3 EEG features at the onset of seizures latency, location, and pattern. Results. The criteria showed at least one of the following features when comparing SSIEEG: prolonged latency, absence of anatomical congruence, lack of concordance of EEG pattern in 11.11% (1/9) of the patients in group 1 and 75 % (3/4) of the patients in group 2. These 3 features were not present in any of the 5 patients who had Engel class I outcome compared with 1 of the 2 patients (50%) who had seizure recurrence after resective surgery. The mean latency of seizure onset in scalp EEG compared with intracranial EEG of patients in group 1 was 17.48 seconds (SD = 16.07) compared with 4.33 seconds (SD = 11.24) in group 2 (P = .03). None of the seizures recorded in patients in group 1 had a discordant EEG pattern in SSIEEG. Conclusion. Concordance in EEG features like latency, location, and EEG pattern, at the onset of seizures in SSIEEG is associated with a favorable outcome after epilepsy surgery in patients with intractable focal epilepsy. Significance. Simultaneous scalp EEG complements intracranial EEG evaluation even after a detailed inpatient scalp video EEG evaluation and could be part of standard intracranial EEG studies in patients with intractable focal epilepsy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
