To investigate the distraction of spatial attention to the task-irrelevant visual stimuli, contingent negative variation (CNV) was measured by using a forewarned reaction time task in 20 healthy subjects. The lasting emission of light, irrelevant to the CNV task, at each perimetric angle of 15°, 30° or 45° to the fixated point was presented to the subjects. The amplitude of early CNV was small only under the light-emission at the angle of 30°. Our results indicate that attention is distracted even by the lasting, task-irrelevant stimuli and that distraction is dependent on the focusing function of attention.
WalterWG. The contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of significance of association in the human brain. Science1964; 146: 434.
2.
McCallumWCWalterWG. The effects of attention and distraction on the contingent negative variation in normal and neurotic subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1968; 25: 319–329.
3.
TecceJJ. Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychol Bull1972; 77: 73–108.
4.
TecceJJSavignano-BowmanJMeinbresseD. Contingent negative variation and the distraction-arousal hypothesis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1976; 41: 277–286.
5.
TecceJJ. A CNV rebound effect. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1979; 46: 546–551.
6.
TecceJJCattanachLYrchikDAMeinbresseDDessonvilleCL. CNV rebound and aging. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1982; 54: 175–186.
7.
TravisFTecceJJ. Effects of distracting stimuli on CNV amplitude and reaction time. Int J Psychophysiol1998; 31: 45–50.
8.
RohrbaughJWSyndulkoKLindsleyDB. Brain wave components of the contingent negative variation in humans. Science1976; 191: 1055–1057.
9.
RohrbaughJWGaillardAWK. Sensory and motor aspects of the contingent negative variation. In: GaillardAWKRitterW, (eds). Tutorials in Event Related Potential Research: Endogenous Components. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ; 1983: 269–310.
10.
RockstrohBMüllerMWagnerMCohenRElbertT. “Probing” the nature of the CNV. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1993; 87; 235–241.
11.
TecceJJCattanachL. Contingent negative variation (CNV). In: NeidermeyerELopes da SilvaF, (eds). Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, 3rd ed.Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1993; 887–910.
12.
ToriiSFukudaHKanemotoHMiyauchiRHamauzuYKawasakiM. Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological effects of odor. In: Van TollerSDoddGH, (eds). Perfumery: The Psychology and Biology of Fragrance. London: Chapman & Hall; 1988; 107–120.
13.
HirumaTYabeHSatoYSutohTShinozakiNSutohT: Clinical and psychophysiological effects of hiba odour. Focus Altern Complem Therap2002; 7: 96.
14.
HirumaTYabeHSatoYSutohTKanekoS. Differential effects of the hiba odor on CNV and MMN. Biol Psychol2002; 61: 321–331.
15.
PosnerMI. Orienting of attention. Quart J Experiment Psychol1980; 32; 3–25.
16.
HinkRFFentonWHJrPfefferbaumATinklenbergJRKopellBS. The distribution of attention across auditory input channels: An assessment using the human evoked potential. Psychophysiol1978; 15: 466–473.
17.
JuleszB. Toward an axiomatic theory of preattentive vision. In:EdelmanGMGallWECowanWM, (eds). Dynamic Aspects of Brain Function. Wiley; New York: 1984; 585–612.
18.
RitterWRotkinLVaughanHGJr. The modality specificity of the slow negative wave. Psychophysiol1980; 17: 222–227.
19.
NakamuraMIidaHFukuiYTakahashiS. Melancholia and excessive CNV recovery after nonresponse condition. Folia Psychiat Neurol Japon1982; 36: 81–88.
20.
MonnierM. Functions of the Nervous System. Sensory Functions and Perception. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York: Elsevier; 1975; 3: 441–442.
21.
OsterbergGA. Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta OphthalSuppl1935; 6.
22.
RizzoPAAlbaniGFPierelliFPozzessereGMorocuttiC. Further observations on experimental pain influence on brain preparatory sets. Phronesis1982; 3: 15–19.
23.
DenothFZappoliRNavonaCRagazzoniA. Posterior alpha activity during vertex-CNV formation under different stimulating conditions. In: KarrerRCohenJTuetingP (eds). Brain and Information: Event-related Potentials. New York: Academy of Sciences; 1984: 177–187.
24.
GaillardAWK. The late CNV wave: Preparation versus expectancy. Psychophysiol1977; 14: 563–568.
25.
SimsonRVaughanHGJrRitterW. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual go/nogo tasks. Clin Neurophysiol. 1977; 43: 864–875.
26.
ÖhmanA. The orienting response, attention, and learning: An information-processing perspective. In: KimmelHD (eds). The Orienting Reflex in Humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1979; 443–471.
