We report another technique of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for exciting the originating cells of the descending corticospinal tract. A cap shaped TMS coil has been described for simultaneously exciting muscles in all four extremities. This TMS coil is useful for monitoring the functional integrity of the descending motor paths during spinal cord surgery, because information regarding the integrity of both the left and right sides of the spinal cord motor paths can be obtained concurrently. Despite the improved design of the cap coil, careful placement is required for achieving bilateral spinal cord motor responses. Cortical mapping was used to identify the optimum scalp foci for the muscles studied. The cap coil must overlap these foci to simultaneously elicit compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in all four extremities. Increasing TMS stimulation intensity will increase the magnitude of the acquired CMAPs responses without significantly changing latency.
BarkerATFreestonILJalinousRMagnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: An introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery1987;70:100–109.
2.
BarkerATJalinousRFreestonIL. Clinical evaluations of conduction time measurements in central motor pathways using magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Lancet (June)1986;8493(1):1325–1326.
3.
BarkerATJalinousRFreestonIL. Non-invasive stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet1985;1:1106–1107.
4.
KrausKHGuginoLDLevyWJAglioLS. The use of a cap shaped coil for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. J Clin Neurophysiol1992;10(3):353–362.
5.
EdmondsHLJrPaloheimoMPBackmanMHTranscranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (tcMMEP) for functional monitoring of motor pathways during scoliosis surgery. Spine1989;14:683–686.
6.
MachidaMWeinsteinSLYamadaTDissociation of muscle action potentials and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials after ischemic damage of spinal cord. Spine1988;13:1119–1124.
7.
ChatrianGEBergerMSWirchAL. Discrepancy between intraoperative SSEPs and postoperative function. Case J Neurosurgery1988;69(3): 450–454 (Case Report).
8.
CrawfordESHessMisrahiem KRCoselliJSThe impact of distal aortic perfusion and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring on presentation of paraplegia after aortic aneurysm operations. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg1988;95(3):357–364.
9.
LesserRPRaudzensPLuderHPostoperative neurologial deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol1986;19:22–25.
10.
GlassmanSDZhangYPShieldsCBTranscranial magnetic motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery. Orthopedics1996;18:1017–1023.
11.
DeletisV. Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathway. Adv Neurol1993;63:201–214.
12.
DayBLDressierDde NoordhoutAElectric and magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: Surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol (Lond)1986;412:449–473.
13.
DayBLThompsonPDDickJPNakashimaKMarsdenCD. Different site of activation of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Neuro Sci Letter1987;75:101–106.
14.
de NoordhoutMaertens ARothwellJCDayBLPercutaneous electric and magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man: Physiological aspects and clinical applications [French], Rev Neurol1989;145: 1–15.
15.
AmassianVECraccoRQMaccabeePJBigland-RitchieBCraccoJB. Matching focal and non-focal magnetic coil stimulation to properties of human nervous system: Mapping motor unit fields in motor cortex contrasted with altering sequential digit movements by premotor-SMA stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1991;43(suppl): 3–28.
16.
CadwellJ. Optimizing magnetic stimulator design. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1991;43(suppl): 238–248.
17.
Brasil-NetoJPCohenLGPanizzaMOptimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: Effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. J Clin Neurophysiol1992;9:132–136.
18.
CohenLGBandinelliSFindleyTWMotor reorganization after upper limb amputation in man: A study with focal magnetic stimulation. Brain1991;114:615–627.
19.
CohenLGBandinelliSTopkaHRTopographic maps of human motor cortex in normal and pathological conditions: Mirror movements, amputations and spinal cord injuries. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1991;43(suppl): 36–50.
20.
CohenLGHallettM. Methodology for non-invasive mapping of human motor cortex with electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1988;69:403–411.
21.
CohenLGHallettM. Noninvasive mapping of human motor cortex. Neurology1988;38:904–909.
22.
CohenLGHallettMLelliS. Noninvasive mapping of human motor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. In: ChokrovertyS, (ed). Clinical Neurophysiology1989: 113–119.
23.
CohenLGRothBJNilssonJEffects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation: Technical considerations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1990;75:350–357.
24.
CohenLGRothBJWassermanEMMagnetic stimulation of the human cerebral cortex, an indicator of reorganization in motor pathways in certain pathological conditions. J Clin Neurophysiol1991;8:56–65.
25.
LevyWJAmassianVTraadMFocal magnetic stimulation reveals motor cortical system reorganized in humans after traumatic quadriplegia. Brain Res1990;510:130–134.
26.
LevyWJAmassianVESchmidUDMapping of motor cortex gyral sites non-invasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects and patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1991;43(suppl): 51–75.
27.
JalinousR. Technical and practical aspects of magnetic nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol1991;8(1):10–25.
28.
PiconiMAChokrovertyS. Percutaneous magnetic coil stimulation of the human cervical vertebral column: Site of stimulation. Neurology1990;40(suppl): 216.
29.
RothBJCohenLGHallettM. The electric field induced during magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1991;43(suppl): 268–278.
30.
RosierKMHessCWHickmanRSignificance of shape and size of the stimulating coil in magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neurosci Lett1989; (May 22) 100 (1–3): 347–352.
31.
AmassianVEQuirkGJStewartM. A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic and electric stimulation of monkey motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1990;77:390–401.
32.
KanekoKFuchigamiYMoritaHEffect of coil position and stimulus intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation on human brain. J Neurol Sci1997;147(2): (April 15): 155–159.
33.
BurkeDHicksRGandeviaSCStephenJWoodforthICrawfordM. Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial and electrical stimulation. J Physiol (Lond)1994; (Oct) 470: 383–393.
34.
EdgleySAEyreJALemonRNExcitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey. J Physiol (Lond)1990;425:301–320.
35.
BerardelliAInghilleriMCruccuGManfrediM. Corticospinal potentials after electrical and magnetic stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1991;43:147–154.
36.
EpsteinCMSchwartzbergDADandyKELocalizing the site of magnetic brain stimulation in humans. Neurology1990;40:666–670.
