Research on the computing method for the forming velocity of circumferential multiple explosive formed projectiles

Abstract

To evaluate the damage capability of circumferential multiple explosive formed projectiles (MEFPs), it is required to predict the EFP forming velocity accurately and quickly. According to the circumferential MEFP liner characteristics of uniform circumferential distribution and layered axial structure, a simplified physical model of circumferential MEFPs is put forward innovatively. The Lagrange and Euler coupling algorithm is selected to simulate the simulation model, which is verified as equivalent to the circumferential MEFPs. Based on the energy conservation principle and the simplified equivalent physical model, the calculating model of the circumferential MEFP forming velocity is derived. The correctness and accuracy of the calculation model are verified by using the numerical simulation software and the test device of the round-shaped charge model.

Keywords

Circumferential multiple explosive formed projectiles explosive formed projectile forming velocity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rao

Padmaja

Singh

, et al. A study of high velocity impact on a layered target of different angles by an explosively formed projectile (EFP). In: Proceedings of the 28th international symposium on ballistics, Atlanta, GA, 22–26 September 2014, pp.1210–1219. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Wang

WB.

The effect of annular multi-point initiation on the formation and penetration of an explosively formed penetrator. Int J Impact Eng 2010; 37: 414–424.

Chen

Hou

, et al. Simulation and experimental investigation of jetting penetrator charge at large stand- off distance. Defence Technol 2013; 9: 117–124.

Paris

Hirschberg

Assaf

, et al. Evaluation of ballistic performance of bi-layered ceramic armor using numerical simulations. In: Proceedings of the 28th international symposium on ballistics, Atlanta, GA, 22–26 September 2014, pp.476–480. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Liang

Jiang

JW.

A numerical analysis on the forming law circumferential MEFP. J Projectiles Rockets Missiles Guidance 2015; 35: 57–64.

Saroha

Singh

Mahala

S.K

, et al. Single point initiated multi-EFP warhead. In: Proceedings of the 25th international symposium on ballistics, Beijing, China, 17–21 May 2010, pp.1298–1303. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press.

Hussain

Hameed

Hetherington

JG.

Analytical performance study of explosively formed projectiles. J Appli Mech Tech Phys 2013; 54: 10–20.

Johnson

Stryk

RA.

Some considerations for 3D EFP computations. Int J Impact Eng 2005; 32: 1621–1634.

Cardoso

Teixeira-Dias

Modelling the formation of explosively formed projectiles (EFP). Int J Impact Eng 2016; 93: 116–127.

10.

Rolc

Buchar

Akstein

, et al. Computer simulation of explosively formed projectiles (EFP). In: Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium on ballistics, Tarragona, Spain, 16–20 April 2007, pp.185–192. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

11.

Hussain

Hameed

Hetherington

, et al. Hydrocode simulation with modified Johnson–Cook model and experimental analysis of explosively formed projectiles. J Energetic Mater 2013; 31: 143–155.

12.

Chen

, et al. Analysis and application research of EFP molding speed based on instantaneous detonation. Min Technol 2005; 5: 87–89.

13.

Zhou

Long

Yue

, et al. An engineering computing method for the velocity of explosively-formed-projectile (EFP) based on the law of energy conservation. Explosion Shock Waves 2005; 25: 378–381.

14.

Yenes

Castedo

Santos

, et al. Experimentation, simulation and analysis of improvised explosive devices-explosively formed projectile. Rev Int Métodos Numér Cálculo Diseño Ing 2016; 32: 48–57.

15.

Century Dynamics Inc. AUTODYN user manual. Condord, CA: Century Dynamics Inc, 2003, pp.14–15.

16.

Nan

Jiang

Wang

, et al. Penetration capability of shaped charge loaded with different high-energy explosives. In: Proceedings of the 28th international symposium on ballistics, Atlanta, GA, 22–26 September 2014, pp.1039–1044. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

17.

Tucker

PG.

Unsteady computational fluid dynamics in aeronautics. New York: Springer, 2014, pp.121–122.