Understanding the causes, types and locations of military casualties likely to be incurred during non-major combat operations is essential to effectively plan for medical resources required to support those operations, yet the threats posed are varied and complex. The dynamic environment that sustains non-major combat operations creates a challenge to diagnose the factors leading to casualties in these operations. We employ a network analytic approach to discover and explore the underlying casualty incident patterns in this complex, real-world operating environment. The aim of this study is to better understand the medical effect of health and irregular general threats. Discovery of these casualty incident patterns proves insightful to military medical planners and commanders.
Department of Defense : Joint publication 1–02: Dictionary of military and associated terms, November 2010. Washington, DC, http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf, (accessed 12 June 2014).
HungBKolitzSOzdaglarA. Optimization-based influencing of village social networks in a counterinsurgency. In: SalmeroJ (ed.) Social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction, 2011, pp.10–17.
7.
ReedBSegalD. Social network analysis and counterinsurgency operations: The capture of Saddam Hussein. Sociol Focus2006; 39(4): 251–264.
8.
DupuyT.Attrition: Forecasting battle casualties and equipment losses in modern warfare. Fairfax, VA: Hero Books, 1990.
9.
KuhnG. Ground forces battle casualty rate patterns: Suggested planning considerations. Logistics Management Institute. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 1991.
10.
BloodCGaukerE. The relationship between battle intensity and disease rates among marine corps infantry units. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 1992.
11.
BloodCGaukerEJollyR. Comparison of medical presentation and admission rates during various combat operations. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 1993.
12.
O’DonnellEBloodC. A bivariate autoregresive integrated moving average analysis of combat troop casualty rates. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 1994.
13.
BloodCZourisJRotblattD. Using the ground forces casualty forecasting system (FORECAS) to project casualty sustainment. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 1997.
14.
ZourisJBloodC. Medical resource planning for combat operations: utilizing percentile estimates an an alternative to the means. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 2000.
15.
BloodCZhangJWalkerG. Implications for modeling casualty sustainment during peacekeeping operations. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 2001.
16.
ZourisJBloodC. Development of modules for the refinement of marine corps casualty estimates. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 2002.
17.
ZourisJWalkerG. Scenario-based projections of wounded-in-action patient condition code distributions. Naval Health Research Center. Fort Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 2005.
18.
FultonLDevoreRBaggK. Medical and casualty estimation model. Center for Army Medical Department Strategic Studies, 2009.
19.
NewmanMEJ. Networks: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.
20.
ClausetANewmanMMooreC. Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys Rev E2004; 70: 066111.
21.
PonsPLatapyM. Computing communities in large networks using random walks. J Graph Algorithms Appl2006; 10(2): 191–218.
22.
BlondelVDGuillaumeJLLambiotteR. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp2008, P10008 (12pp).
23.
BrandesUDellingDGaertlerM. On modularity clustering. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Engng2008; 20(2): 172–188.
24.
RandWM. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J Am Stat Assoc1971; 66(336): 846–850.
25.
DanonLDiaz-GuileraADuchJ. Comparing community structure identification. J Stat Mech2005; P09008.
