Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A six-degree-of-freedom simulation of kinetic interceptors and modeling of a strapdown antenna platform have been worked out in Matlab Simulink to analyze the implication of nonlinear factors and the cross-coupling effect for the strapdown antenna platform. From the results of the simulation, the cross-coupling effect, which is between the inner gimbal and outer gimbal of the strapdown antenna platform, has less implication on the angular speed output. When the nonlinear factor was introduced, both the cross-coupling effect between the inner gimbal and outer gimbal and that between a missile body and antenna platform were increased. The results provide a theoretical foundation and simulation model for further research on the strapdown antenna platform.

Keywords

Kinetic vehicle strapdown antenna platform cross-coupling effect Simulink

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fowler

. Instrumentation for ballistic missile defense: lessons learned from the LEAP experiment. In: IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference, St. Paul, MN, 1998.

Rudin

. Strapdown stabilization for imaging seekers. In: Second annual interceptor technology conference, Albuquerque, NM, 1993, pp.1–10.

Debruin

Royalty

Wand

. Feed-forward stabilization test bed. Proc SPIE 1996; 2739: 204–214.

Kennedy

. Direct versus indirect line of sight (LOS) stabilization. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2003; 11: 3–15.

Zhou

Liu

. Study of stability for strapdown antenna platform. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2003; 29: 509–511 (in Chinese).

Waldmann

. Line-of-sight rate estimation and linearizing control of an imaging seeker in tactical missile guided by proportional navigation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2002; 10: 556–557.

Zhou

Liu

X.H

. Design of an angle tracking system with strapdown antenna platform. Syst Eng Electron 2003; 25: 1200–1202.

Rue

. Precision Stabilization Systems. IEEE Transactions. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1974, 10(1): 34–42.

Zipfel

. Modeling and simulation of aerospace vehicle dynamics. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2000.

10.

Stevens

Lewis

. Aircraft control and simulation. Wiley-Interscience, 2003.

11.

Phillips

Malyevac

. Pulse motor optimization via mission charts for an exoatmospheric interceptor. J Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut 1997; 21: 989–999.

12.

Hablan

. Multiaxis tracking and attitude control of flexible spacecraft with reaction jets. J Guidance Control Dyn 1994; 17: 831–839.

13.

Anthony

Wie

. Pulse-modulated control synthesis for a flexible spacecraft. J Guidance Control Dyn 1990; 13: 1014–1021.

14.

Wang

Yang

. Application of an optimization PWPF regulator in the kinetic interceptor. Astronaut J 2005; 26: 576–580.

15.

Bertsekas

. Dynamic programming and optimal control. Belmont: Athena Scientific, 1995.

16.

Zhou

. Integrated control for space vehicle with large angle attitude maneuvers. In: First IFAC workshop on space robotics, Montreal, 1998, pp.115–119.

17.

Mckerly

. A model for two degree of freedom coupled seeker with mass imbalance. IEEE Proc Control Syst Technol 1996; 9(1): 84–87.

The Simulation and analysis of a strapdown antenna platform in kinetic interception progress

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References