Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

There has been much attention for many years on reducing U.S. fuel imports in order to improve energy independence. The transportation sector is one of the most important components with its share of 28% of total U.S. energy consumption. In this research, compressed natural gas (CNG) is examined as an alternative fuel for the U.S. transportation sector. To be able to answer this question it is essential to understand both the supply and demand sides of the problem. This research aims to exhibit the availability and adequacy of CNG as a full or partial fuel replacement for U.S. transportation sector needs, the factors that prevent CNG from being a widely used transportation fuel, the cost–benefit of using CNG as a vehicle fuel, and feasible changes to make CNG more cost effective. In conjunction with putting forth this information for consideration, the best short- and long-term scenarios for CNG use in the transportation sector, provided through the application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), is proposed.

Keywords

Compressed natural gas CNG transportation alternative fuel

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Energy Information Administration. Natural gas consumption by sector. 2010.

Murphy

. The Role of Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.

Alias

. Study of sequential multipoint injection nozzle effect of compressed natural gas engine. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University, Pahang, Malaysia, 2008.

American Chemistry Council. Shale gas and new petrochemicals investment: Benefits for the economy, jobs, and U.S. manufacturing. 2011.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. Annual energy outlook 2011. Washington D.C., 2011.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. net imports by country (2011). 2011.

U.S. Department of Energy. Alternative fuels and advanced vehicles data center. 2012.

Saaty

. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 2008; 1(1): 83–98.

Office of the Press Secretary. President to attend copenhagen climate talks, 2009.

10.

U.S. Congress. Energy Security Act of 2011. Text of S. 689, 2011.

11.

Saaty

. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 1990; 48(1): 9–26.

12.

Center for Transportation Analysis Energy and Transportation Science Division. Transportation Energy Data Book. 30th edition. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2011.

13.

U.S. Census Bureau. Energy supply and disposition by type of fuel (2012). 2012.

14.

Environmental Protection Agency. Unit conversions, emissions factors and other reference data. 2004.

15.

MIT. Units and conversions fact sheet. 2007.

16.

Office of the Press Secretary. President Obama announces historic 54.5 mpg fuel efficiency standard, 2012.

17.

Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division. CRS report for congress. Washington D.C., 2007.

18.

Environmental Protection Agency. 2017–2025 model year light-duty vehicle GHG emissions and CAFE standards: Supplemental notice of intent. 2011.

Compressed natural gas as a feasible replacement fuel for U.S. transportation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References