In this paper we introduce an approach to predict emplacements of improvised explosive devices (IEDs). With a brief review of studies and technology in related areas, this paper identifies and analyzes various factors in a great number of IED/terrorist attacks, and then categorizes the factors/features based on locations and time. By combining the results of analysis with other significant factors, such as casualties, numbers injured, population density, and international impact, this paper proposes an approach to predict IED emplacements with Bayesian inference. The proposed approach has been implemented and the results of testing are consistent with a group of actual incidents.
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). AAP-6(2007): NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions: Listing Terms of Military Significance and Their Definitions for Use in NATO. Brussels: NATO Standardization Agency, 2007.
Vic SnyderC. The Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization: DOD’s Fight Against IEDs Today and Tomorrow. Report of U.S. House of Representatives – Committee on Armed Services – Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations, 2008, Retrieved 26 November 2010, from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA490963.
WilsonC. Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) in Iraq and Afghanistan: Effects and Countermeasures. CRS Report for Congress, 2006. Retrieved 20 September 2010, from: http://italy.usembassy.gov/pdf/other/RS22330.pdf.
7.
WilsonC. Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) in Iraq and Afghanistan: Effects and Countermeasures. CRS Report for Congress, 2007. Retrieved 20 September 2010, from: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RS22330.pdf.
8.
WilsonC. Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) in Iraq and Afghanistan: Effects and Countermeasures. CRS Report for Congress, 2008. Retrieved 20 September 2010, from: http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RS22330_20080208.pdf.
MoultonJ.Rethinking IED strategies from Iraq to Afghanistan. Military Review2009; (July-August): 26-33.
11.
DohertyRM. Science and technology to counter improvised explosive devices. Presentation on NDIA Conference on Combating Terrorist Use of Explosives (2010), Ft. Walton Beach, FL, USA, 28 April 2010. Retrieved 15 September 2010, from: http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2010GlobalExplosive/Doherty.pdf.
12.
WhitneyP. Technosocial modeling of IED threat scenarios and attack. In IEEE Spring Symposium Series Papers 2009 – Technosocial Predictive Analytics, 2009, pp. 142-147.
13.
Van Dyke ParunakHSauterJCrossmanJ. Multi-layer simulation for analyzing IED threats. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST’ 09), 11-12 May 2009.
14.
JohnsonCWNilsen-NygaardL.Extending the use of evacuation simulators to support counter terrorism: using models of human behaviour to coordinate emergency responses to improvised explosive devices. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Systems Safety, Vancouver, Canada, 2008.
15.
JohnsonCWNilsen-NygaardL.A ‘systemic approach’ for countering the threat to public safety from improvised explosive devices. In Proceedings of the International Systems Safety Conference (ISSC09), Manchester, UK, 18-20 October 2009.
16.
Nilsen-NygaardLJohnsonCW.Using mathematical models to guide the simulation of improvised explosive devices in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 3rd IET International Conference on Systems Safety, Manchester, UK, 2008.
17.
Paté-CornellEGuikemaS.Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: a systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. Military Operations Research2002; 7(4): 5-20.
18.
FrankenPM. Development of an ontology-based tool to support the test and evaluation process for rapid acquisition of IED detection. International Test and Evaluation Association Journal2009; 30: 300-308.
19.
RussomannoDJ. Common IED exploitation target set ontology. In Proceedings of the Conference on Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Target XV, Orlando, FL, USA, 5 April 2010.
20.
TwardyC. Rapid initiative assessment for counter IED investment. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Workshop on Bayes Applications (UAI-AW 2009), Montreal, Canada, 18 June 2009.
21.
AyvazUDereMTiahYM.Using the MANA agent-based simulation tool to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ground-based and airborne communications jammers in countering the IED threat to ground convoys. In Proceedings of the 2007 Spring Simulation Multiconference, Norfolk, VA, USA, 25-29 May 2007, Vol. 2.
22.
AngellARappaportC.Computational modeling analysis of radar scattering by clothing covered arrays of metallic body-worn explosive devices. Progress in Electromagnetics Research2007; 76: 285-298.
