Influencing the civilian population comprises a key task for all of the factions in a stabilization environment. This makes it a key driver for military decision makers, who wish to understand how they can win the hearts and minds of the local people. This paper briefly describes the requirement for representing influence at the tactical level, and presents a possible mechanism for modeling the effects of Information Operations. Throughout this work the term Information Operations is used to refer to non-kinetic influence activities excepting cyber operations, which will require separate treatment if they are to be represented in the Stabilization Operations Analysis Tool.
The Asia Foundation.Afghanistan in 2009 - a survey of the Afghan people, 2009.
2.
Bryant DJ, Lichacz FMJ, Hollands JG and Baranski JVModeling situation awareness in an organizational context: military command and control. In: Banbury S and Tremblay S (eds) A cognitive approach to situation awareness: theory and application. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.
3.
Sherif M. and Sherif CWSocial psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
4.
Corman SR, Trethewey A., JR Goodall, HLA 21st century model for communication in the global war of ideas. Report 0701. Arizona State University, AZ: Consortium for Strategic Communication, 2007.
5.
McCroskey SJC , Prichard SVO and Arnold WEAttitude intensity and the neutral point on semantic differential. Public Opin Q1967.
6.
Waters M.The initial verification, validation and calibration of the stand-alone STORM model. Annex B in: Mistry B and Waters M (eds) Social networks & culture in HQ modelling. Calibration and integration of STORM with extant C2 model DARNOS. DSTL/CR23849/1.0 (Unclassified), 2007.
