Effectively contesting the battle for perceptions to gain the consent of indigenous populations is central to success in stabilization operations. This article examines the current approach to modeling Strategic Communication and Influence in stabilization wargaming employed within the UK Ministry of Defence, found at present in the Peace Support Operations Model suite. It describes the options for enhancing the representation of Strategic Communication and Influence at the strategic, operational and tactical levels, blending human—in-the-loop and computer-based approaches, concluding with an assessment of the future challenges and opportunities in this field.
Wenham MHInformation operations: main effort or supporting effort?Br Army Rev2009; 146: 46-52.
2.
Anon.Security and stabilisation: the military contribution. UK Joint Doctrine Publication, 2009, pp.3-40.
3.
Defence Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC).Security and Stabilisation: the military contribution . UK Join Doctrine Publication (JDP) vol. 3-40, 2009Anon.Countering insurgency, British Army Field Manual (AFM) Vol. 1, Pt. 10, 2009.
4.
Petraeus DHLearning counterinsurgency: observations from soldiering in Iraq. Mil Rev2006; January-February: 7-12.
5.
Anon.Concise Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
6.
Defence Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC).United Kingdom glossary of joint and multinational terms and definitions. UK Joint Doctrine Publication (JDP) vol. 0-01.1, 2006
7.
Paul C.Strategic communication is vague: say what you mean. Joint Force Q2010; 56: 10-13.
8.
US Army.Field manual (FM) 3-24, counterinsurgency . HQ Department of the Army, 2006.
9.
US Army/US Marine Corps.Counterinsurgency manual. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
10.
Murphy D. In Search of the art and science of strategic communication. Parameters2009; 39: 105-116.
11.
Hammes TXInformation warfare. In: David GJ and McKeldin TR (eds), Ideas as weapons: influence and perception in modern warfare. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2009 , pp.27-34.
12.
Tatham SAStrategic Communication: a primer. Defence Academy of the United Kingdom Advanced Research and Assessment Group Special Series Paper08/28, 2008.
13.
Cross Government Afghanistan Communication Team.Afghanistan. Whitehall Core Script , http://afghanistan.hmg.gov.uk/en ( 2010, accessed 25 June 2010).
14.
Corman SR, Trethewey A. and Goodall, B.A 21st century model for communication in the global war of ideas: from simplistic influence to pragmatic complexity. Report #0701. Arizona State University, AZ: Consortium for Strategic Communication, 2007.
15.
West JPInformation (in) operations: more than technology. In: David GJ and McKeldin TR (eds) Ideas as weapons: influence and perception in modern warfare. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2009, pp.123-132.
16.
Utting K.the information campaign and countering insurgency: lessons from Palestine 1945-1948. RUSI, http://www.rusi.org/analysis/commentary/ref:C4AB7E3B86C0B8/ (2009, accessed 10 September 2010).
17.
Forsberg C.The Taliban’s campaign for Kandahar . Afghanistan Report3: Institute for the Study of War, 2009.
18.
Corman SR and Schiefelbein JSCommunication and media strategy in the Jihadi war of ideas. Report #0601. Arizona State University, AZ: Consortium for Strategic Communication, 2006.
19.
Various.Strategic communications in countries emerging from violent conflict conference. In: Conference Report. Albany Associates, 24-25 June 2009.
20.
MacKay A. and Tatham S.Behavioural conflict. From general to strategic corporal: complexity, adaptation and influence. The Shrivenham Papers, No. 9, 2009 .
21.
Simpson E.Gaining the Influence Initiative: Why kinetic operations are central to influence in Southern Afghanistan. Br Army Rev2009; 147: 67-71.
22.
Tatham S.Tactical strategic communication: placing informational effect at the centre of command. Br Army Rev2009; 147, 58-66.
23.
Paul C.Whither strategic communication? A survey of current proposals and recommendations . RAND Occasional papers, http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP250/ ( 2009, accessed 10 September 2010).
24.
Tversky A. and Kahneman D.Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science1974; 185: 1124-1131.
25.
Cialdini RBInfluence: science and practice, 5th ed. Pearson Education, Inc., 2009, Boston, MA, USA.
26.
Bryant DJ, Lichacz FMJ, Hollands JG and Baranski JVModeling situation awareness in an organizational context: military command and control. In: Banbury S and Tremblay S (eds) A cognitive approach to situation awareness: theory and application. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004, pp.104-116.
27.
Gaffney H.Information operations in PSOM2 - structure and development. Draft unpublished Dstl report, August 2010.
28.
Gaffney H. and Vincent A.Modeling tactical information operations in a stabilisation environment . J Defense Model Simulat (this issue).
