Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The use of ontologies to represent data and knowledge combined with service-based software provides new opportunities for the integration of command and control systems, simulations, and dynamic data. The U.S. Department of Defense's Global Information Grid (GIG) is envisioned to integrate complex communications networks, data from disparate sources, and services-oriented applications. The GIG will provide analysis, decision support, and information visualization to both human and automated users. This paper describes concepts and architecture for an experiment which demonstrates the use of knowledge-based technologies to support tactical maneuver. Open source and in-house software were linked together to conduct a simple simulation of a realistic mission (move from A to B along a “safe” route). Events which may affect the route are injected, reported, and stored in the knowledge base to simulate battlespace dynamics. Through the use of an automated reasoner, events which affect the route are identified and passed to the decision maker to stimulate possible replanning. Follow-on efforts will convert the maneuver related software into web services, moving closer to the GIG concept. Discussed is the value of a formal ontology within the domain of military maneuver, architectural approach, and lessons learned.

Keywords

ground vehicle mobility ontology assured mobility global information grid data modeling service oriented architecture vehicle route planning simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] Department of Defense (DoD). Vision for a Net-Centric, Service-Oriented DoD Enterprise. June 2007. Available from http://www.defenselink.mil/cio-nii/docs/GIGArchVision.pdf

[2] Joint Forces Command. Capstone Requirements Document: Global Information Grid (GIG). JROCM 134–01. 30 August 2001.

[3] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Doctrine for Joint Operations, JP 3–0. 10 September 2001. Available from http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp3_0.pdf

[4] Gruber, T.

A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.

Knowledge Acquisition 1993; 5 (2): 199–220.

[5] National Research Council . Network Science, The National Academies Press, 2006

[6] Richmond PW, Blais CL, Nagle JA, Goerger NC, Gates BQ, Burk RK, Willis JB, Keeter R. “Standards for the Mobility Common Operational Picture (M-COP): Elements of Ground Vehicle Maneuver,” U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory; 2007. Report No.: ERDC/GSL TR-07–4.

[7] Blais CL , Goerger NC , Richmond PW , Gates BQ , Pace M.

“Data Mapping and Ontology Design for Common Maneuver Networks,”

Paper 05S-SIW-140, Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, San Diego, CA, 2005.

[8] Blais CL , Goerger NC , Richmond PR , Gates BQ , Willis JB.

“Global Information Grid Services and Generation of the Mobility Common Operational Picture,”

Paper 05F-SIW-107, Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Orlando, FL, 2005.

[9] Goerger NC , Blais BL , Gates BQ , Nagle JA , Keeter, RR.

“Toward Establishing the Mobility Common Operational Picture: Needs Analysis and Ontology Development in Support of Interoperability,”

Paper 06S-SIW-044, Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Huntsville, AL, 2006.

10.

[10] Nagle JA , Blais BL , Burk RK , Gates BQ , Goerger NC , Richmond PW.

“The Mobility Common Operational Picture Data Model: A Foundation for Conceptual Interoperability in the Domain of Ground Vehicle Mobility and Maneuver”

Paper 06F-SIW-005, Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Orlando, FL, 2006.

11.

[11] Burk RK , Goerger NC , Gates BQ , Blais BL , Nagle JA , Goerger S. “Knowledge Representation for Military Mobility Decision-Making by Humans and Intelligent Software”. In Extending the Horizons: Advances in Computing, Optimization, and Decision Technologies. Springer. New York, 2007.

12.

[12] Gallo G , Pallottino S.

“Shortest paths algorithms.”

Annals of Operations Research 1988; 13: 3–79.

13.

[13] Dijkstra EW.

“A note on two problems in connexion with graphs.”

Numerische Mathematik 1959; 1: 269–271.

14.

[14] Sedgewick R , Vitter, JS.

“Shortest paths in Euclidean Graphs.”

Algorithmica 1986; 1 (1): 31–48.

15.

[15] Richmond PW, Scoggins RK, Gates BQ, Yamauchi H. “Common Ground Vehicle Route Planning for Army Simulations” Paper 07S-SIW-062, Spring 2007 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Norfolk, VA, 2007.

16.

[16] Blais CL , Goerger NC , Richmond P , Gates B , Pace, M.

“Data Mapping and Ontology Design for Common Maneuver Networks”

Paper 05S-SIW-140, Spring 2005 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, San Diego, CA, 2005.

17.

[17] Baylot EA Jr, Gates BQ, Green JG, Richmond PW, Goerger, NC, Mason GL, Cummins CL, Bunch LS. “Standard for Ground Vehicle Mobility.” Vicksburg (MS): U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory; 2005. Report No.: ERDC/GSL TR-05–6.

18.

[18] Buss AH , Sanchez P. “Simple Movement and Detection in Discrete Event Simulation.” In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 992–1000. Orlando, FL, 4–7 December 2005 M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, F. B. Armstrong, and J. A. Joines, eds. Available from http://www.informs-cs.org/wsc05papers/118.pdf

19.

[19] Beeker E.

“Potential error in the reuse of Nilsson's A Algorithm for path-finding in military simulations.”

Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulations 2004; 1 (2): 91–97.

20.

[20] Sirin E , Parsia B , Grau BC , Kalyanpur A , Katz Y.

“Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner.”

Journal of Web Semantics 2007; 5 (2): 51–52.

21.

[21] Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, Boley H, Tabet S, Grosof B, Dean M. “SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML”, 19 November 2003. Available from http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/

22.

[22] Alberts DS, Hayes RE. Understanding Command and Control. Department of Defense Command and Control Research Program. 2006. Available from http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_UC2.pdf.

23.

[23] Kleiner M, Carey S, Roberts J, Altenau M, Yu H, Gates BQ, Nelson E. “Geospatial Battle Management Language: Bridging GIS, C2 and Simulations.” Paper #2107 ESRI Users' Conference. 2007. Available from http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc07/papers/abstracts/a2107.html

24.

[24] IEEE Standard Upper Ontology Working Group. “Suggested Merged Upper Ontology.” Available from http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUMO/index.html

Using an Ontology for Entity Situational Awareness in a Simple Scenario

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References