Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Keywords

scientific method research methods harking manuscript reviews alternative hypotheses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bacharach

S. B.

(1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/258555

Busenbark

J. R.

Yoon

Gamache

D. L.

Withers

M. C.

(2022). Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). Journal of Management, 48(1), 17-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006458

Dunnette

M. D.

(1966). Fads, fashions, and folderol in psychology. American Psychologist, 21(4), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023535

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Wright

P. M.

(2017). Harking, sharking, and tharking: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487

James

L. R.

Mulaik

S. A.

Brett

J. M.

(1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Sage.

Kerr

N. L.

(1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4

Lishner

D. A.

(2021). HARKing: Conceptualizations, harms, and two fundamental remedies. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 41(4), 248-263. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000182

Mackenzie

K. D.

House

(1978). Paradigm development in the social sciences: A proposed research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 3(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1978.4296297

McKinley

(2010). Organizational theory development: Displacement of ends? Organization Studies, 31(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347055

10.

Platt

J. R.

(1964). Strong inference. Science, 146(3642), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.347

11.

Rubin

(2017). When does HARKing hurt? Identifying when different types of undisclosed post hoc hypothesizing harm scientific progress. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000128

12.

Rupp

D. E.

(2011). Ethical issues faced by editors and reviewers. Management and Organization Review, 7(3), 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00227.x

13.

Starbuck

W. H.

(2016). 60th Anniversary essay: How journals could improve research practices in social science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216629644

Are Review Teams Getting Too Involved in the Revision of Manuscripts?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References