Digital disruption has changed organizations in an unprecedented way. The thriving field of digital leadership is expanding fast and few retrospective studies on this evolution have been made so far. This study presents a bibliometric and network analysis combining both Scopus and Web of Science databases to provide fresh insights into the evolution of the digital leadership research field. This study is based on a review of 79 publications from 57 journals, published between 2000 and 2020. The newness of the topic and the range of journals in which it is published confirms that digital leadership has gained interest from several different areas. Bibliometric analysis provides a description of the research field identifying the leading publishing journals, affiliation statistics, and most influential authors and expressive publications in the research field. Network analyses identify keyword evolution over time, co-citation relationships, and research clusters. Content analysis is used to identify key topics in the field with attention paid to interrelations among them. A brief description of each paper in the dataset and its methodological approach is provided. The results suggest that the topic will continue to attract more research, as it has not yet entered its maturity stage. This paper contributes to the literature by analyzing the relationship between digital leadership and e-leadership. This study also identifies the most leading digital leadership capabilities for a fast-changing world. Limitations and future avenues are also discussed.
AmitK.RissI.PopperM. (2016). The role of leadership in the migration decision-making process. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 14(4), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2015.1132805
AnoyeA. B.KouaméJ. S. (2018). Leadership challenges in virtual team environment. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 160-167.
4.
AvolioB. J.KahaiS. S. (2003). Adding the ‘e’ to e-leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00133-X
5.
AvolioB. J.KahaiS.DodgeG. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00062-X
6.
AvolioB. J.SosikJ. J.KahaiS. S.BakerB. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
7.
BalthazardP. A.WaldmanD. A.WarrenJ. E. (2009). Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 651-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.008
8.
BanerjeeP.ChauP. Y. K. (2004). An evaluative framework for analysing e-government convergence capability in developing countries. Electronic Government, 1(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.004135
9.
BartschS.WeberE.BüttgenM.HuberA. (2021). Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: How to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Service Management, 32(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0160
10.
BatističS.ČerneM.VogelB. (2017). Just how multi-level is leadership research? A document co-citation analysis 1980–2013 on leadership constructs and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.007
11.
BelitskiM.LiversageB. (2019). E-Leadership in small and medium-sized enterprises in the developing world. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1212
12.
BojeD. M.RhodesC. (2005). The virtual leader construct: The mass mediatization and simulation of transformational leadership. Leadership, 1(4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715005057232
13.
BoldenR.ReganN. O. (2016). Digital disruption and the future of leadership: An interview with rick haythornthwaite, chairman of centrica and MasterCard. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(4), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616638173
14.
BolukbasiT.ChangK. W.ZouJ.SaligramaV.KalaiA. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 4356-4364.
15.
BhattY.GhumanK.DhirA. (2020). Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 120988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120988
BraunS.BarkA. H.KirchnerA.StegmannS.Van DickR. (2019). Emails from the boss—curse or blessing? Relations between communication channels, leader evaluation, and employees’ attitudes. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(1), 50-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415597516
CampionL. L.CampionE. D. (2020). Leading matters: Take it from the professionals — a high-level overview of virtual leadership according to educational technology scholars (and a few others). Tech Trends, 64(1), 182-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00470-7
20.
CampsT. W. A. (2009). Two images of the future: Virtual leadership and leadership in organisation. Journal of Chain and Network Science, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2009.x169
CoboM. J.López-HerreraA. G.Herrera-ViedmaE.HerreraF. (2011a). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
23.
CoboM. J.López-HerreraA. G.Herrera-ViedmaE.HerreraF. (2011b). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
24.
ContrerasF.BaykalE.AbidG. (2020). E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: What we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 590271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.5902
25.
CorderyJ.SooC.KirmanB.RosenB.MathieuJ. (2009). Leading parallel global virtual teams: Lessons from Alcoa. Organizational Dynamics, 38(3), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.04.002
26.
CortellazzoL.BruniE.ZampieriR. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
27.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
28.
DaiS.DuanX.ZhangW. (2020). Knowledge map of environmental crisis management based on keywords network and co-word analysis, 2005-2018. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121168
29.
DaricsE. (2020). E-leadership or “ how to be boss in instant messaging ?” the role of nonverbal communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416685068
30.
DasGuptaP. (2011). Literature review: E-leadership. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(1), 1-36.
31.
DavarzaniH.FahimniaB.BellM.SarkisJ. (2016). Greening ports and maritime logistics: A review. Transportation Research Part D, 48, 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.007
32.
DeSanctisG.PooleM. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
33.
De PaoliD.RopoA. (2015). Open plan offices - the response to leadership challenges of virtual project work?Journal of Corporate Real State, 17(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-08-2014-0020
34.
DiraniK. M.AbadiM.AlizadehA.BarhateB.GarzaR. C.GunasekaraN., … MajzunZ. (2020). Leadership competencies and the essential role of human resource development in times of crisis: A response to COVID-19 pandemic. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 380-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078
35.
DoghriS. B. S.HorchaniS. C.MouelhiM. (2020). The e-leadership linking inter-organizational collaboration and ambidextrous innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500432
36.
DonthuN.KumarS.MukherjeeD.PandeyN.MarcW. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
37.
DozioN.MarcolinF.ScuratiG. W.UlrichL.NonisF.VezzettiE.MarsocciG.La RosaA.FerriseF. (2022). A design methodology for affective Virtual Reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 162, 102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102791
38.
ElidjenM. L. W. W.RukmanaR. A. N. (2019). Intervening role of innovation management on relationship between digital leadership and dynamic capability accelerated by collaboration. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(1), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10i1.2237
39.
El SawyO. A.AmsinckH.KraemmergaardP.VintherA. L. (2016). How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 141-166.
40.
ErtzM.Leblanc-ProulxS. (2018). Sustainability in the collaborative economy: A bibliometric analysis reveals emerging interest. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1073-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.095
41.
FahimniaB.SarkisJ.DavarzaniH. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162(April), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
42.
FarajS.RennoW.BhardwajA. (2021). Unto the breach: What the COVID-19 pandemic exposes about digitalization. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100337
43.
FenwickM.McCaheryJ. A.VermeulenE. P. M. (2021). Will the world ever be the same after COVID-19? Two lessons from the first global crisis of a digital age. European Business Organization Law Review, 22(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00194-9
44.
FernandezD. B.JawadiN. (2015). Virtual R&D project teams: From e-leadership to performance. The Journal of Applied Businesss Research, 31(5), 1693-1709. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v31i5.9384
45.
Figueroa-RodríguezK. A.Álvarez-ÁvilaM. d. C.CastilloF. H.RindermannR. S.Figueroa-SandovalB. (2019). Farmers' market actors, dynamics, and attributes: A bibliometric study. Sustainability, 11(3), 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030745
46.
GalvagnoM.GiacconeS. C. (2019). Mapping creative tourism research: Reviewing the field and outlining future directions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 43(8), 1256-1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019862030
47.
GerthA. B.PeppardJ. (2016). The dynamics of CIO derailment: How CIOs come undone and how to avoid it. Business Horizons, 59(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.09.001
48.
GibsonC. B.GibbsJ. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451-495. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
49.
Gierlich-JoasM.HessT.NeuburgerR. (2020). More self-organization, more control -or even both? Inverse transparency as a digital leadership concept. Business Research, 13(3), 921-947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00130-0
50.
GleaveT.Al-HawamdehS. (2002). Knowledge economy and the digital divide in Asia. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 1(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649202000121
51.
GümüşS.BellibaşMŞGümüşE.HallingerP. (2019). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: A bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.157873
52.
HaiT. N.VanQ. N.TuyetM. N. T. (2021). Digital transformation: Opportunities and challenges for leaders in the emerging countries in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(SI), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-SPER-03
53.
HaleemA.KhanM. I.KhanS.JamiA. R. (2020). Research status in Halal: A review and bibliometric analysis. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 2(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-06-2019-0014
54.
HambleyL. A.O’NeillT. A.KlineT. J. B. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004
HertelG.GeisterS.KonradtU. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
57.
HollandJ. B.MalveyD.FottlerM. D. (2009). Health care globalization: A need for virtual leadership. The Health Care Manager, 28(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0b013e3181a2cb63
IannottaM.MeretC.MarchettiG. (2020). Defining leadership in smart working contexts: A concept synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.556933
60.
İnelM. N. (2019). An empirical study on measurement of efficiency of digital transformation by using data envelopment analysis. Management Science Letters, 9(4), 549-556. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.1.008
61.
JäckliU.MeierC. (2020). Leadership in the digital age: Its dimensions and actual state in Swiss companies. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 19(4), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2020.110815
JawadiN.DaassiM.FavierM.KalikaM. (2013). Relationship building in virtual teams: A leadership behavioral complexity perspective. Human Systems Management, 32(3), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-130791
64.
JiangH.LuoY.KulemekaO. (2017). Strategic social media use in public relations: Professionals’ perceived social media impact, leadership behaviors, and work-life conflict. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11(1), 18-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1226842
65.
JohnsonS. L.SafadiH.FarajS. (2015). The emergence of online community leadership. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0562
66.
JoshiA.LazarovaM. B.LiaoH. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1287/Orsc.1080.0383
67.
KaneG. C.PhillipsA. N.CopulskyJ.AndrusG. (2019). How digital leadership is(n’t) different. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39.
68.
KayworthT. R.LeidnerD. E. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045697
69.
KerfootK. M. (2010). Listening to see: The key to virtual leadership. Nursing Economics, 28(2), 114.
70.
KempsterS.ParryK. W. (2011). Grounded theory and leadership research: A critical realist perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.010
71.
Keathley-HerringH.Van AkenE.Gonzalez-AleuF.DeschampsF.LetensG.OrlandiniP. C. (2016). Assessing the maturity of a research area: Bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics, 109(2), 927-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x
72.
KirchnerK.IpsenC.HansenJ. P. (2021). COVID-19 leadership challenges in knowledge work. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 493-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.1877579
73.
KirkmanB. L.MathieuJ. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279113
KriegelH. P.KrögerP.SanderJ.ZimekA. (2011). Density-based clustering. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(3), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.30
76.
LarsonL.DeChurchL. A. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
77.
LeducS.GuilbertL.ValleryG. (2015). Impact of ICTs on leadership practices: Representations and actions. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(4), 380-395. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2013-0090
LeeJ. D.Cassano-PinchéA.VicenteK. J. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of human factors (1970-2000): A quantitative description of scientific impact. Human Factors, 47(4), 753-766. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570970
80.
LiW.LiuK.BelitskiM.GhobadianA.ÓReganN. (2016). E-leadership through strategic alignment: An empirical study of small -an medium- sized enterprises in the digital age. Journal of Information Technology, 31(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.10
LiuC.Van WartM.KimS.WangX.MccarthyA.ReadyD. (2020). The effects of national cultures on two technologically advanced countries: The case of e-leadership in South Korea and the United States. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(3), 298-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12433
LiuC.ReadyD.RomanA.Van WartM.WangX. H.McCarthyA.KimS. (2018). E-leadership: An empirical study of organizational leaders’ virtual communication adoption. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(7), 826-843. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2017-0297
85.
LuL.ShenC.WilliamsD. (2014). Friending your way up the ladder: Connecting massive multiplayer online game behaviors with offline leadership. Computers in Human Behavior, 35(June), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.013
86.
MadukaN. S.EdwardsH.DavidG.OsborneA.BabatundeS. O. (2018). Analysis of competencies for effective virtual team leadership in building successful organisations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(2), 696-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0124
87.
MarsilioM.CappellaroG.CorradoC. (2011). The intellectual structure of research into PPPs. Public Management Review, 13(6), 763-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.539112
88.
MatzlerK.von den EichenS. F.AnschoberM.KohlerT. (2018). The crusade of digital disruption. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(6), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2017-0187
89.
MaznevskiM. L.ChudobaK. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200
MeghanaJ.VijayaR. (2019). E-leadership, psychological contract and real-time performance management: Remotely working professionals. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 16(3), 101-111.
92.
MihardjoL. W. W.SasmokoAlamsyahF.ElidjenE. (2019a). Digital leadership impacts on developing dynamic capability and strategic alliance based on market orientation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.24
93.
MihardjoL. W. W.SasmokoAlamsyahF.ElidjenE. (2019b). Digital leadership role in developing business model innovation and customer experience orientation in industry 4.0. Management Science Letters, 9, 1749-1762. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.6.015
94.
MihardjoL. W. W.SasmokoAlamsyahF.ElidjenE. (2019c). The influence of digital leadership on innovation management based on dynamic capability: Market orientation as a moderator. Management Science Letters, 9, 1059-1070. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.3.018
NagelL. (2020). The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digital transformation of work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9–10), 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0323
NahF. F.LauJ. L.JinghuaK. (2001). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150110392782
99.
NasutionR. A.ArnitaD.RusnandiL. S. L.QodariahE.RuditoP.SinagaM. F. N. (2020). Digital mastery in Indonesia: The organization and individual contrast. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-03-2019-0081
100.
OrlikowkiW. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
101.
PengB. (2021). Digital leadership: State governance in the era of digital technology. Cultures of Science, Advance online publication, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096608321989835
102.
PerizadeB.EkaD.WidiyantiM.AdamM.MuhtiaF. (2017). Virtual leadership: Concept, expectation and future. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(10), 227-239.
103.
PeterM. K.KraftC.LindequeJ. (2020). Strategic action fields of digital transformation: An exploration of the strategic action fields of Swiss SMEs and large enterprises. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(1), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-05-2019-0070
104.
Pomaza-PonomarenkoA. L.HrenL. M.DurmanO. L.BondarchukN. V.VorobetsV. (2020). Management mechanisms in the context of digitization of all spheres of society. Revista San Gregorio, 42(special edition), 1-9.
105.
PradhanB. B. (2019). Review paper on virtual leadership. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(6), 633-638.
106.
PrasharA.Sunder MV. (2020). A bibliometric and content analysis of sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118665
107.
PritchardA. (1969). Statistic bibliography or bibliometrics?Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
108.
PulleyM. L.SessaV. I. (2001). E-leadership: Tackling complex challenges. Industrial and Commercial Training, 33(6), 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850110405379
109.
PulleyM. L.SessaV.MalloyM. (2002). E-leadership: A two-pronged idea. T + D, 56(3), 34-47.
110.
PurvanovaR. K.BonoJ. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004
111.
PurvanovaR. K.KendaR. (2018). Paradoxical virtual leadership: Reconsidering virtuality through a paradox lens. Group & Organization Management, 43(5), 752-786. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118794102
112.
RichardsonJ. W.ClemonsJ.SterrettW. (2020a). How superintendents use technology to engage stakeholders. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 5(4), 954-988. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2020.4.1
113.
RomanA. V.Van WartM.WangX.LiuC.KimS.McCarthyA. (2019). Defining e-leadership as competence in ICT-mediated communications: An exploratory assessment. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 853-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12980
114.
Rubino-HallmanS.HannaN. K. (2007). New technologies for public sector transformation: A critical analysis of e-government initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of E-Government, 3(3), 3-39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J399v03n03_02
115.
SasmokoS.MihardjoL. W. W.AlamsjahF.ElidjenE. (2019). Dynamic capability: The effect of digital leadership on fostering innovation capability based on market orientation. Management Science Letters, 9(10), 1633-1644. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.024
116.
SaputraN.HutajuluG. E. (2020). Engaging the millennials at office: Tracking the antecedents of holistic work engagement. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 342-354. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.1.25
117.
SchmidtG. B. (2014). Virtual leadership: An important leadership context. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(2), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12129
118.
SchwarzmüllerT.BrosiP.DumanD.WelpeI. M. (2018). How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. Management Revue, 29(2), 114-138. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-114
119.
SherkK. E.NausedaF.JohnsonS.ListonD. (2009). An experience of virtual leadership development for human resource managers. Human Resources for Health, 7(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-1
120.
SorianoA. S.ÁlvaresC. L.ValdésR. M. T. (2018). Bibliometric analysis to identify an emerging area: Public relations intelligence — a challenge to strengthen technological observatories in the network society. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1591-1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2651-8
121.
SproullL.KieslerS. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
122.
TakeyS. M.CarvalhoM. M. (2016). Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: A conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 111(October), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.011
123.
ThomasD.BostromR. (2010). Building trust and cooperation through technology adaptation in virtual teams: Empirical field evidence. Edpacs, 42(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2010.537182
124.
ThompsonL. F.CoovertM. D. (2003). Teamwork online: The effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and postdiscussion accuracy. Group Dynamics, 7(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.2.135
125.
ToleikienėR.RybnikovaI.JuknevičienėV. (2020). Whether and how does the crisis-induced situation change e-leadership in the public sector? Evidence from Lithuanian public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16(SI), 149-166. doi:10.24193/tras.SI2020.9
TureskyE. F.SmithC. D.TureskyT. K. (2020). A call to action for virtual team leaders: Practitioner perspectives on trust, conflict and the need for organizational support. Organization Management Journal, 17(4), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-09-2019-0798
128.
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
129.
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1109.2058.
130.
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
131.
Van WartM.RomanA.PierceS. (2016). The rise and effect of virtual modalities and functions on organizational leadership: Tracing conceptual boundaries along the e-management and e-leadership continuum. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 12(SI), 102-122.
132.
Van WartM.RomanA.WangX.LiuC. (2017). Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: Identifying the elements of e-leadership. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316681446
133.
VenkateshV.BrownS. A.BalaH. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(3), 855-879. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.09
134.
VialG. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
135.
WadeM.ShanJ. (2020). COVID-19 has accelerated digital transformation, but may have made it harder not easier. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(3), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00034
136.
WakefieldR. L.LeidnerD. E.GarrisonG. (2008). A model of conflict, leadership, and performance in virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0149
137.
WalvoordA. A. G.ReddenE. R.ElliottL. R.CoovertM. D. (2008). Empowering followers in virtual teams: Guiding principles from theory and practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1884-1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.006
138.
WaltmanL.van EckN. J.NoyonsE. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
139.
WangB.SchlagweinD.Cecez-KecmanovicD.CahalaneM. C. (2020). Beyond the factory paradigm: Digital nomadism and the digital future(s) of knowledge work post-COVID-19. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(6), 1379-1401. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00641
140.
WeiJ.ZhaoK.ZhangR.WangM. (2021). Exploring development and evolutionary trends in carbon offset research: A bibliometric perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(15), 18850-18869. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12908-8
141.
WilliamsR. I.AnneL.ClarkW. R.RaffoD. M. (2021). Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: Additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Journal, 39(4), 521-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.007
142.
WolorC. W.SolikhahS.FidhyallahN. F.LestariD. P. (2020). Effectiveness of e-training, e-leadership, and work life balance on employee performance during COVID-19. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 443-450. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.443
143.
YilmazR.YilmazF. G. K.KeserH. (2020). Vertical versus shared e-leadership approach in online project-based learning: A comparison of self-regulated learning skills, motivation and group collaboration processes. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 628-654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09250-2
144.
ZaccaroS. J.BaderP. (2003). E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams: Minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280640.0005
145.
ZeikeS.BradburyK.LindertL.PfaH. (2019). Digital leadership skills and associations with psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142628
ZiekP.SmulowitzS. (2014). The impact of emergent virtual leadership competencies on team effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(2), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2012-0043
ZimmermannP.WitA.GillR. (2008). The relative importance of leadership behaviours in virtual and face-to-face communication settings. Leadership, 4(3), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008092388
150.
ZupicI.ČaterT. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
