How Do Leaders vs. Followers Construct Followership? A Field Study of implicit followership theories and Work-Related Affect Using Latent Profile Analysis

Abstract

In this study, we integrate follower categorization theory with affective events theory (AET) to investigate the extent to which within-person patterns of implicit followership theories (IFTs) and work-related affect predict job satisfaction for leaders versus followers. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify and to describe distinct profiles of IFTs and work-related affect for leaders versus followers. For the sample of 242 leaders, two profiles with distinct patterns of IFTs and work-related affect (Proactive and Alienated) were found. Leaders with Proactive views of followers showed above-average ratings of work-related affect, while leaders with Alienated views of followers showed lower ratings of work-related affect. In the sample of 240 followers, there were four profiles of followers with distinct patterns of IFTs and work-related affect (Conforming, Alienated, Proactive, and Negative). Despite showing a similar pattern of IFTs, followers with Alienated views of their own role showed below-average ratings of work-related affect, while followers with Negative views of their own role showed the highest ratings of work-related affect. These findings suggest that IFTs and work-related affect show unique within-person interaction for followers. Furthermore, for followers, profile membership of IFTs and work-related affect significantly predicted mean levels of job satisfaction. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

follower categorization followership implicit followership theories affective events theory job satisfaction latent profile analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adolphs, R., & Damasio, A. R. (2001). The interaction of affect and cognition: A neurobiological perspective.

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Brose

Voelkle

M. C.

Lövdén

Lindenberger

Schmiedek

(2015). Differences in the between–person and within–person structures of affect Are A matter of degree. European Journal of Personality, 29(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1961

Bergman, L. R., & Andersson, H. (2010). The person and the variable in developmental psychology. Journal of Psychology, 218, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000025

Buettner

C. K.

Bartle-Haring

Andrews

D. W.

Khurana

(2010). Perceptions of alcohol policy and drinking behavior: Results of a latent class analysis of college student drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 35(6), 628-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.01.011

Carsten

M. K.

Uhl-Bien

(2012). Follower beliefs in the Co-production of leadership: Examining upward communication and the moderating role of context. Journal of Psychology/Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220(4), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000115

Carsten

Uhl-Bien

West

Patera

McGregor

(2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 543-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.015

Celeux

Soromenho

(1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195-212.

Chaleff

(2008). Creating new ways of following. In Riggio

Chaleff

Lipman-Blument

(Eds.), The Art of followership: How great followers create great leaders and organizations (pp. 67-87). Jossey-Bass.

10.

Chaminade

Decety

(2002). Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport, 13(15), 1975-1978.

11.

Cogliser

C. C.

Schriesheim

C. A.

Scandura

T. A.

Gardner

W. L.

(2009). Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader–member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.010

12.

Cook

J. D.

Hepworth

S. J.

Wall

T. D.

Warr

P. B.

(1981). The experience of work: A compendium and review of 249 measures and their use. Academic Press Limited.

13.

Coyle

P. T.

Foti

(2015). If you’re not with me you’r,E…? examining prototypes and cooperation in leader–follower relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051814550830

14.

Crossman, B., & Crossman, J. (2011). Conceptualising followership-a review of the literature. Leadership, 7(4), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715011416891

15.

Dalal, R. S. (2013). Job attitudes: Cognition and affect. In N. W. Schmitt, S. Highhouse, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 341–366). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

16.

Dalal

R. S.

Lam

Weiss

H. M.

Welch

E. R.

Hulin

C. L.

(2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1051-1066. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44636148

17.

DeRue

D. S.

(2011). Adaptive leadership theory: Leading and following as a complex adaptive process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 125-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.007

18.

DeRue

D. S.

Ashford

S. J.

(2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627-647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok627

19.

Engle

E. M.

Lord

R. G.

(1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 988-1010. https://doi.org/10.5465/256956

20.

Epitropaki

Martin

Tram-Quon

Topakas

(2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005

21.

Erdogan

Bauer

T. N.

(2014). Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory: The relational approach to leadership. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations, (pp. 407-433). Oxford University Press.

22.

Foti

R. J.

Bray

B. C.

Thompson

N. J.

Allgood

S. F.

(2012). Contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leader perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(4), 702-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.007

23.

Foti

R. J.

Knee

R. E.

Jr. Backert

R. S. G.

(2008). Multi-level implications of framing leadership perceptions as a dynamic process. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.007

24.

Foti

R. J.

McCusker

M. E.

(2017). Person-oriented approaches to leadership: A roadmap forward. In Schyns

Hall

R. J.

Neves

(Eds.), Handbook of methods in leadership research (pp. 195-228). Edward Elgar Publishing.

25.

Goodman

L. A.

(1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148-170.

26.

Graen

G. B.

Hui

Taylor

(2004). A new approach to leadership: Upward, downward, and horizontal differentiation. In Graen

(Ed.), LMX Leadership Vol. 2 (pp. 33-66). Information Age Publishing.

27.

Graen

G. B.

Hui

Taylor

(2006). Experience-based learning about LMX leadership and fairness in project teams: A dyadic directional approach. Academy of management learning and education, 5(4), 448-460. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473205

28.

Hoption

Barling

Turner

(2013). “It's not you, it's me”: Transformational leadership and self-deprecating humor. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(1) , 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731311289947

29.

Judge

T. A.

Kammeyer-Mueller

J. D.

(2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511

30.

Judge

T. A.

Piccolo

R. F.

Kosalka

(2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 855-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004

31.

Junker

N. M.

Stegmann

Braun

Van Dick

(2016). The ideal and the counter-ideal follower–advancing implicit followership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1205-1222. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2015-0085

32.

Kahneman

(1999). Objective happiness. In Diener

Schwarz

Kahneman

(Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3-27). Russell Sage Foundation.

33.

Kahneman

Krueger

(2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526030

34.

Kahneman

Riis

(2005). Living, and thinking about it: Two perspectives on life. In Huppert

F. A.

Kaverne

Baylis

(Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 285-304). Oxford University Press.

35.

Kellerman

(2007). What every leader needs to know about followers. Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 84-91.

36.

Kelley

(1992). The power of followership. Doubleday.

37.

Kelley

R. E.

(2008). Rethinking followership. In Riggio

R. E.

Chaleff

Lipman-Blumen

(Eds.), The Art of followership. How great followers create great leaders and organizations. (pp. 5-15). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

38.

Klotz

A. C.

Bolino

M. C.

Song

Stornelli

(2017). Examining the nature, causes, and consequences of profiles of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 629-647. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2259

39.

Kruse

(2010). Positive Cascade: Prototypical LIFTs scores predict interpersonal success. Paper presented at the Annual Academy of Management Conference, Montréal, Canada.

40.

Kruse

(2011, January). Manipulating implicit theories by inducing affect. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2011(1), 1-6. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

41.

Kruse

E. T.

(2010). Positive Cascade: Prototypical LIFTs scores predict interpersonal success. In Sy, Thomas (Chair) & van Knippenberg, Daan (Chair), What do leaders think of followers? Exploring implicit followership theories. Montreal, Canada: Symposium conducted at the meeting of Academy of Management.

42.

Lanza

S. T.

Dziak

J. J.

Huang

Wagner

Collins

L. M.

(2013). PROC LCA & PROC LTA users’ guide (Version 1.3.0). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State. Retrieved from http://methodology.psu.edu

43.

Lawrence

B. S.

Zyphur

M. J.

(2011). Identifying organizational faultlines with latent class cluster analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110376838

44.

LePine

J. A.

Podsakoff

N. P.

LePine

M. A.

(2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor– hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764-775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921

45.

Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, and H. B. Mann (Eds), Contributions to Probability and Statistics (pp. 278-292). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

46.

Lord

R. G.

Brown

D. J.

(2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

47.

Lord

R. G.

Foti

R. J.

De Vader

C. L.

(1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6

48.

Lord

R. G.

Maher

K. L.

(1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions with performance. Unwin Hyman.

49.

Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2013). A person-centered approach to the study of commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 23(2), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.07.007

50.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2012). Mplus (Version 6.12). Los Angeles, CA.

51.

Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176

52.

Nylund

K. L.

Asparouhov

Muthén

B. O.

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396

53.

Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004

54.

Pillai

Uhl-Bien

(2007). The romance of leadership and the social construction of followership. In Shamir

Pillai

Bligh

M. C.

Uhl-Bien

(Eds.), Follower-centered perspectives on leadership (pp. 187-210). Information Age Publishing.

55.

Potter

Rosenbach

(2006). Followers as partners: The spirit of leadership. Contemporary issues in leadership, 8, 143-158.

56.

Rosch

(1977). Human categorization. In Warren

(Ed.), Advances in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1). Academic Press.

57.

Rosch

(1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch

Lloyd

B. B.

(Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Erlbaum.

58.

Rubin

D. B.

(1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581

59.

Saari

L. M.

Judge

T. A.

(2004). Employee attitudes and job satisfaction. Human resource management: Published in cooperation with the school of business administration. The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 43(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20032

60.

Sacco

Bucholz

K. K.

Spitznagel

E. L.

(2009). Alcohol use among older adults in the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions: A latent class analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70(6), 829-838. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2009.70.829

61.

Scherbaum

C. A.

Naidoo

L. J.

Ferreter

J. M.

(2007). Examining component measures of team leader–member exchange (LMX-SLX) using item response theory. In Graen

G. B.

Graen

J. A.

(Eds.), New multinational network sharing (pp. 129-156). Information Age Publishing.

62.

Schwartz

(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464.

63.

Schyns

Meindl

J. R.

(2005). An overview of implicit leadership theories and their application in organization practice. In Schyns

Meindl

J. R.

(Eds.), Implicit leadership theories (pp. 15-36). Information Age Publishing.

64.

Shaffer

J. L.

(1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman & Hall.

65.

Shamir

(2007). From passive recipients to active co-producers: Followers’ roles in the leadership process. In Shamir

Pillai

Bligh

M. C.

Uhl-Bien

(Eds.), Follower - centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of james R. Meindl (pp. ix-xxxix). Information Age Publishing.

66.

Shondrick, S. J., Dinh, J. E., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 959-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.004

67.

Shondrick

S. J.

Lord

R. G.

(2010). Implicit leadership and followership theories: Dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory, and leader–follower processes. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470661628.ch1

68.

Smith

R. C.

Coyle

P. T.

Baldner

Bray

B. C.

Geller

E. S.

(2013). A field investigation of perceived behavioral control and blood alcohol content: A pattern-oriented approach. Addictive Behaviors, 38(4), 2080-2083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.003

69.

Stogdill

R. M.

(1963). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire: Form XII. Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research, College of Commerce and Administration.

70.

(2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.001

71.

Thody

(2003). Followership in educational organizations: A pilot mapping of the territory. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(2), 141-156.

72.

Thoroughgood

C. N.

Padilla

Hunter

S. T.

Tate

B. W.

(2012). The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 897-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.007

73.

Tims

Bakker

A. B.

Derks

(2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141

74.

Uhl-Bien, M., & Pillai, R. (2007). The romance of leadership and the social construction of followership. Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl, 187-209.

75.

Uhl-Bien

Riggio

R. E.

Lowe

K. B.

Carsten

M. K.

(2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007

76.

Van Dyne

LePine

J. A.

(1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108-119.

77.

Weiss

H. M.

Brief

A. P.

(2001). Affect at work: A historical perspective. Emotions at work: Theory, research and applications in management, 133-171.

78.

Weiss

H. M.

Cropanzano

(1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1-74.

79.

Whiteley

Johnson

S. K.

(2012). Leaders’ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 822-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.006

80.

Yang

(2006). Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(4), 1090-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.004

81.

Yang

Shi

Zhang

Song

(2020). Implicit followership theories from the perspective of followers. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 581-596. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0225