The present study addresses a lack of literature examining contextual factors when investigating gender norms and leader effectiveness. Supervisor–subordinate dyads were assessed for gender dissimilarity effects on ratings of leadership effectiveness. The effect of organizational culture as a moderating force on these effects was also investigated. Results bolster relational demography theory, such that supervisors who fit existing norms (i.e., male supervisors) were rated higher than supervisors that do not (i.e., female supervisors). However, lower ratings for female supervisors were mitigated by effective organizational cultures.
BakarH. A.McCannR. M. (2014). Matters of demographic similarity and dissimilarity in supervisor–subordinate relationships and workplace attitudes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.04.004
2.
BarretoM.RyanM. K.SchmittM. T. (Eds.). (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
BoyceA. S.NieminenL. R.GillespieM. A.RyanA. M.DenisonD. R. (2015). Which comes first, organizational culture or performance? A longitudinal study of causal priority with automobile dealerships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 339-359. doi:10.1002/job.1985
5.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
CabreraS. F.SauerS. J.Thomas-HuntM. C. (2009). The evolving manager stereotype: The effects of industry gender typing on performance expectations for leaders and their teams. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 419-428. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01519.x
7.
DayD. V. (2001). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 581-613. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8
8.
DenisonD. R. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational Dynamics, 13(2), 5-22.
9.
DenisonD. R.MishraA. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organizational Science, 6, 204-223. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.204
10.
DenisonD. R.NealeW. S. (1996). Denison Organizational Culture Survey. Ann Arbor. MI: Aviat.
11.
DinhJ. E.LordR. G.GardnerW. L.MeuserJ. D.LidenR. C.HuJ. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 36-62. Retrieved from http://dro.dur.ac.uk/11980/1/11980.pdf
12.
DuehrE. E.BonoJ. E. (2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?Personnel Psychology, 59, 815-846. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00055.x
13.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
14.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
15.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573
16.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J.MakhijaniM. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.125
17.
EdelmanP. J.van KnippenbergD. (2017). Training leader emotion regulation and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 747-757. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9471-8
18.
EpitropakiO.MartinR. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659-676. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659
19.
FeyC.DenisonD. R. (2003). Organizational culture and effectiveness: Can an American theory be applied in Russia?Organization Science, 14, 686-706. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.686.24868
20.
GoldbergC.RiordanC. M.ZhangL. (2008). Employees’ perceptions of their leaders: Is being similar always better?Group & Organization Management, 33, 330-355. doi:10.1177/1059601108318232
21.
HainesE. L.DeauxK.LofaroN. (2016). The times they are a-changing . . . or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 353-363. doi:10.1177/0361684316634081
22.
HartnellC. A.OuA. Y.KinickiA. (2011). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework’s theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 677-694. doi:10.1037/a0023086
23.
HartnellC. A.WalumbwaF. O. (2010). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. In AshkanasyN. M.WilderomC. P. M.PetersonM. F. (Eds.), The handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 225-248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
HeilmanM. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
25.
HeilmanM. E.BlockC. J.MartellR. F.SimonM. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935-942. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.935
26.
HoxJ. J. (1993). Factor analysis of multilevel data: Gauging the Muthén model. In OudJ. H. L.van Blokland-VogelesangR. A. W. (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal and multivariate analysis in the behavioral sciences (pp. 141-156). Nijmegen, Netherlands: ITS.
27.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.IliesR. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36-51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36
28.
JunkerN. M.van DickR. (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1154-1173. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.09.002
29.
KerrR.GarvinJ.HeatonN.BoyleE. (2006). Emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27, 265-279. doi:10.1108/01437730610666028
30.
KirkmanB. L.ChenG.FarhJ. L.ChenZ. X.LoweK. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744-764. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43669971
31.
KoI.KotrbaL.RoebuckA. (2015). Leaders as males? The role of industry gender composition. Sex Roles, 72, 294-307. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0462-4
32.
KochA. J.D’MelloS. D.SackettP. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 128-161. doi:10.1037/a0036734
33.
KoenigA. M.EaglyA. H.MitchellA. A.RistikariT. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616-642. doi:10.1037/a0023557
34.
LaHuisD. M.FergusonM. W. (2009). The accuracy of significance tests for slope variance components in multilevel random coefficient models. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 418-435. doi:10.1177/1094428107308984
35.
LauD. C.LamL. W.SalamonS. D. (2008). The impact of relational demographics on perceived managerial trustworthiness: Similarity or norms?Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 187-208. doi:10.3200/socp.148.2.187-209
36.
LawrenceB. S. (1984). Age grading: The implicit organizational timetable. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 5, 23-35. doi:10.1002/job.4030050104
37.
LawrenceB. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1-22. doi:10.1287/orsc.8.1.1
38.
LordR. G.FotiR. J.De VaderC. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6
39.
LynessK. S.HeilmanM. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777-785. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777
40.
Ortiz-WaltersR.SchneiderG. P.SheikhA.SimioneK. A. (2012). The glass ceiling in public accounting. In DreamCatchers Group, LLC (Ed.), Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Proceedings (pp. 19-22). Arden, NC: DreamCatchers Group, LLC.
41.
Paustian-UnderdahlS. C.WalkerL. S.WoehrD. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1129-1145. doi:10.1037/a0036751
42.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165-179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
ScheinV. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95-100. doi:10.1007/bf00288030
45.
ScheinV. E. (1975). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340-344. doi:10.1037/h0076637
46.
ScheinV. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social issues, 57, 675-688. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00235
47.
ThoroughgoodC. N.SawyerK. B.HunterS. T. (2013). Real men don’t make mistakes: Investigating the effects of leader gender, error type, and the occupational context on leader error perceptions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 31-48. doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9263-8
48.
TsuiA. S.O’ReillyC. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
49.
TsuiA. S.PorterL. W.EganT. D. (2002). When both similarities and dissimilarities matter: Extending the concept of relational demography. Human Relations, 55, 899-929. doi:10.1177/0018726702055008176
50.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18.htm
