The literature on women’s under-representation in academia asserts that faculty women face a ‘chilly climate’, but there are few theoretically based studies examining this proposition. Relational demography, organizational justice, and social network theories all identify possible antecedents of ‘chilly climate’. Using survey data of faculty at a private Midwestern US university, we test whether the perception of exclusion (chilly climate) is influenced by demographic dissimilarity, and perceptions of fairness and gender equity. We find that faculty women perceive more exclusion from academic departments with a low representation of women, consistent with relational demography. Perceptions of procedural fairness and gender equity are powerful factors that foster inclusion and warm the climate for both men and women. The ‘chilly climate’ for women faculty is a complex phenomenon with multiple causes. Policies that fail to address these multiple causes are unlikely to be effective.
AAUP (2005) Inequities still exist for women and non-tenure-track faculty: The annual report on the economic status of the profession, 2004-05. Academe91(2): 21-30.
2.
Aisenberg N. and Harrington M. ( 1988) Women of Academe. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
3.
Ambrose M. and Cropanzano R. ( 2003) A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology88(2): 266-275.
4.
Astin HS and Sax LJ ( 1996) Undergraduate women in Science: Personal and environmental influences on the development of scientific talent. In: Davis C, Ginorio A, Hollenshead C, Lazarus B and Rayman P (eds) The Equity Equation: Women in Science, Mathematics and Engineering. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 96-121.
5.
Bailyn L. ( 1993) Breaking the Mold. New York : Free Press.
6.
Bernard J. ( 1964) Academic Women. New York: Meridian Books.
7.
Blader S. and Tyler T. ( 2003) A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a ‘fair’ process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin29(6): 747-758.
8.
Blakemore J., Switzer JY, DiLorio J. and Fairchild D. ( 1997) Exploring the campus climate for women faculty . In: Benokraitis N (ed.) Subtle Sexism: Current Practice and Prospects for Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 54-71.
9.
Blalock H. ( 1967) Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Wiley.
10.
Blalock H. ( 1982) Race and Ethnic Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Byrne D. ( 1971) The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
12.
Budig M. ( 2002) Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator? Social Problems49(2): 258-277.
13.
Callister R. ( 2006) The impact of gender and department climate on job satisfaction and intentions for faculty in science and engineering fields . Journal of Technology Transfer31(3): 367-75.
14.
Caplan PJ ( 1993) Lifting a Ton of Feathers: A Woman’s Guide to Surviving in the Academic World. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
15.
Chamberlain M (ed.) (1988) Women in Academe: Progress and Prospects. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
Chatman J. and O’Reilly C. ( 2004) Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal47(2): 193-208.
17.
Cropanzano R., Rupp D., Mohler C. and Schminke M. ( 2001) Three roads to organizational justice. In: Ferris G (ed.) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Oxford: JAI Press, 1-114.
18.
Doty DH and Glick WH ( 1998) Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods1(4): 374-406.
19.
Fox M. ( 1991) Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity . In: Zuckerman H, Cole JR and Bruer JT (eds) The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: W.W. Norton, 188-204.
20.
Garvey W. ( 1979) Communication: The Essence of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
21.
Gatta M. and Roos P. ( 2005) Rethinking occupational integration. Sociological Forum20(3): 369-402.
22.
Gersick C., Bartunek J. and Dutton J. ( 2000) Learning from academia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1026-1044.
23.
Goldberg C. ( 1999) MIT acknowledges bias against female professors . New York Times, 23 March, p. A16.
24.
Greenberg J. ( 1990) Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow . Journal of Management16(2): 399-432.
25.
Gutek B. ( 1985) Sex and the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Hopkins N., Bailyn L., Gibson L. and Hammonds E. ( 2002) The Status of Women Faculty at MIT: An Overview of Reports from the Schools of Architecture and Planning; Engineering; Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences; and the Sloan School of Management. Available at: www.MIT.edu/faculty/reports/overview.html.
27.
Hultin M. ( 2003) Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Career consequences of occupational sex segregation. Work and Occupations30(1): 30-61.
28.
Ibarra H. ( 1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly37(3): 422-447.
29.
Ibarra H. ( 1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review18(1): 56-87.
30.
Ibarra H. and Smith-Lovin L. ( 1997) New directions in social network research on gender and organizational careers. In: Cooper C and Jackson S (eds) Creating Tomorrow’s Organizations. New York: Wiley, 359-383.
31.
James K., Lovato C. and Cropanzano R. ( 1994) Correlational and known-group comparison validation of a workplace prejudice/discrimination inventory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology24(17): 1573-1592.
32.
Kanter R. ( 1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Kirchmeyer C. ( 1995) Demographic similarity to the work group: A longitudinal study of managers at the early career stage. Journal of Organizational Behavior16(1): 67-83.
34.
Koberg C. and Chusmir L. ( 1991) Sex role conflict in sex-atypical jobs: A study of female-male differences. Journal of Organizational Behavior12(5): 461-466.
35.
Konrad A., Winter S. and Gutek B. ( 1992) Diversity in work group sex composition: Implications for majority and minority members. In: Tolbert P, Bacharach S, Lawler E and Torres D (eds) Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 115-140.
36.
Lamertz K. ( 2002) The social construction of fairness: Social influence and sense making in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(1): 19-37.
37.
Lucas A. ( 2000) Leading Academic Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
McKnight PE, McKnight KM, Sidani S. and Figueredo AJ ( 2007) Missing Data: A Gentle Introduction. New York: Guildford Press.
39.
McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L. and Cook J. ( 2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks . Annual Review of Sociology27: 415-444.
40.
Meade A., Watson A. and Kroustalis C. ( 2007) Assessing common methods bias in organizational research . Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.
41.
Mehra A., Kilduff M. and Brass D. ( 1998) At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal41(4): 441-452.
42.
Miner-Rubino K. and Cortina LM ( 2007) Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology92(5): 1254-1269.
43.
Monroe K., Ozyurt S., Wrigley T. and Alexander A. ( 2008) Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics6(2): 215-233.
44.
Mor Barak M., Cherin D. and Berkman S. ( 1998) Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science34(1): 82-104.
45.
National Academy of Sciences (2006) Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
46.
National Science Foundation (2003) Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics.
47.
Riger S., Stokes J., Raja S. and Sullivan M. ( 1997) Measuring perceptions of the work environment for female faculty. The Review of Higher Education21(1): 63-78.
48.
Riordan C. and Shore L. ( 1997) Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology82(3): 342-358.
49.
Sandler B. ( 1986) The Chilly Climate Revisited: Chilly for Women Faculty, Administrators and Graduate Students. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
50.
Schneider B. and Reichers AE ( 1983) On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology36(1): 19-39.
51.
Settles I., Cortina L., Malley J. and Stewart A. ( 2006) The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly30(1): 47-58.
52.
Settles I., Cortina L., Stewart A. and Malley J. ( 2007) Voice matters: Buffering the impact of a negative climate for women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly31(3): 270-281.
53.
Simeone A. ( 1987) Academic Women. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
54.
South SJ, Bonjean C., Markham W., and Corder, J. ( 1982) Social structure and group interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review24: 367-380.
55.
Tolbert P., Simons T., Andrews A. and Rhee J. ( 1995) The effects of gender composition in academic departments on faculty turnover. Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(3): 562-579.
56.
Touchton J., McTighe Musil C. and Campbell K. ( 2008) A Measure of Equity: Women’s Progress in Higher Education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
57.
Tsui A., Egan T. and O’Reilly C. ( 1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly37(4): 549-579.
58.
Tsui A., Porter L. and Egan T. ( 2002) When both similarities and dissimilarities matter: Extending the concept of relational demography. Human Relations55(8): 899-929.
59.
Tyler TR and Lind EA ( 1992) A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna M (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 25, 115-292.
60.
Umphress EE, Labianca J., Brass DJ, Kass E. and Scholten, L. ( 2003) The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees’ perceptions of organizational justice. Organization Science14(6): 738-753.
61.
Van Prooijen JW, Van Den Bos K. and Wilke HAM ( 2004) Group belongingness and procedural justice: Social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(1): 66-79.
62.
Vecchio R. and Bullis RC ( 2001) Moderators of the influence of supervisor-subordinate similarity on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology86(5): 884-896.
63.
West C. and Zimmerman D. ( 1987) Doing gender. Gender & Society1(2): 125-151.
64.
West M. and Curtis J. ( 2006) AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
65.
Wharton A., Rotolo T. and Bird S. ( 2000) Social context at work: A multilevel analysis of job satisfaction . Sociological Forum15(1): 65-90.
66.
Widnall S. ( 1988) American Association for the Advancement of Science Presidential Lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science241(4874): 1740-1745.
67.
Williams C. ( 1992) The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in female professions. Social Problems39(3): 253-267.
68.
Williams C. ( 1995) Still a Man’s World. Berkeley : University of California Press.
69.
Wylie A. ( 1995) The contexts of activism on ‘climate’ issues . In: The Chilly Collective (eds) Breaking Anonymity: The Chilly Climate for Women Faculty. Waterloo, CA: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 29-60.
70.
Xu Y. ( 2008) Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education49(7): 607-624.
