Setting the Scene: Partners’ Leadership Behavior and Employees’ Perceptions of Work Performance in Professional Service Firms

Abstract

The effect of leadership behavior on work performance is highly context sensitive. We address this notion by investigating leadership behavior in one important but understudied organizational context—namely, professional service firms (PSFs). We examine how partners’ leadership behavior in a PSF relates to employee self-leadership, creative climate, and work performance (N = 442). The results show that partners’ consideration leadership behavior is positively related to employees’ perceived work performance. Moreover, partners’ consideration and intellectual stimulation leadership behavior are especially important drivers of self-leadership and creative climate in a PSF, which in turn are positively related to employees’ work performance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

leadership employee self-leadership creative climate work performance professional service firms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amabile

T. M.

Conti

Coon

Lazenby

Herron

(1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.

Amundsen

Martinsen

Ø. L.

(2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 304-323. doi:10.1177/1548051814565819

Andressen

Konradt

Neck

C. P.

(2012). The relation between self-leadership and transformational leadership: Competing models and the moderating role of virtuality. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19, 68-82. doi:10.1177/1548051811425047

Bandura

(1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bass

B. M.

(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.

Bass

B. M.

Avolio

(1995). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Bass

B. M.

Stogdill

R. M.

(1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Free Press.

Bresnahan

M. J.

Donohue

W. A.

Shearman

S. M.

Guan

(2009). Research note: Two measures of conflict orientation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26, 365-379.

10.

Brislin

(1986). The wording and translation of research instruments In Lonner

W. J.

Berry

J. W.

(Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

Bryman

Stephens

Campo

C. A.

(1996). The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 353-370.

12.

Burns

J. M.

(1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

13.

Denison

D. R.

(1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619-654.

14.

Derue

D. S.

Nahrgang

J. D.

Wellman

Humphrey

S. E.

(2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7-52. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x

15.

Donnelly

(2009). The knowledge economy and the restructuring of employment: The case of consultants. Work, Employment & Society, 23, 323-341. doi:10.1177/0950017009102861

16.

Ekvall

(1991). The organizational culture of idea-management: A creative climate for the management of ideas. In Henry

Walker

(Eds.), Managing innovation (pp. 73-79). London, England: Sage.

17.

Ekvall

(1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123.

18.

Ekvall

(1997). Organizational conditions and levels of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6, 195-205. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00070

19.

Ekvall

Arvonen

(1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7(1), 17-26. doi:10.1016/0956-5221(91)90024-U

20.

Ekvall

Arvonen

Waldenström-Lindblad

(1983). Creative organizational climate: Construction and validation of a measuring instrument (Vol. 2). Stockholm, Sweden: FA-Rådet.

21.

Fleishman

E. A.

(1973). Twenty years of consideration and structure. In Fleishman

E. A.

Hunt

J. G.

(Eds.), Current developments in the study of leadership (pp. 1-40). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

22.

Florida

(2002). The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.

23.

Furtner

M. R.

Baldegger

Rauthmann

J. F.

(2013). Leading yourself and leading others: Linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 436-449.

24.

Houghton

J. D.

Dawley

DiLiello

T. C.

(2012). The Abbreviated Self-Leadership Questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7, 216-232.

25.

Houghton

J. D.

Yoho

S. K.

(2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (Baker College), 11(4), 65-83.

26.

Isaksen

S. G.

Ekvall

(2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73-88.

27.

Johns

(2006). The essential impact of context in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386-408.

28.

Judge

T. A.

Piccolo

R. F.

Ilies

(2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36-51.

29.

Keller

R. T.

(2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 202-210.

30.

Kerr

Jermier

J. M.

(1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403.

31.

Kuvaas

Buch

Dysvik

Haerem

(2012). Economic and social leader–member exchange relationships and follower performance. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 756-765. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.013

32.

Lambert

L. S.

Teppe

B. J.

Carr

J. C.

Holt

D. T.

Barelka

A. J.

(2012). Forgotten but not gone: An examination of fit between leader consideration and initiating structure needed and received. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 913-930. doi:10.1037/a0028970

33.

Levy

P. E.

Williams

J. R.

(2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881-905. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005

34.

Lovelace

K. J.

Manz

C. C.

Alves

J. C.

(2007). Work stress and leadership development: The role of self-leadership, shared leadership, physical fitness and flow in managing demands and increasing job control. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 374-387.

35.

Lowe

K. B.

Kroeck

K. G.

Sivasubramaniam

(1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.

36.

Malhotra

Smets

Morris

(2016). Career pathing and innovation in professional service firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30, 369-383. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0108

37.

Manz

C. C.

Sims

H. P.

(1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5, 361-367.

38.

Manz

C. C.

Sims

H. P.

(2001). The new superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

39.

Mumford

M. D.

Gustafson

S. B.

(1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43.

40.

Mumford

M. D.

Scott

G. M.

Gaddis

Strange

J. M.

(2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-750.

41.

Muthén

B. O.

Muthén

L. K.

Asparouhov

(2016). Regression and mediation analysis using mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

42.

Neck

C. P.

Houghton

J. D.

(2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 270-295.

43.

Neck

C. P.

Manz

C. C.

(1996). Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee cognition, behavior, and affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 445-467. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199609)17:5<445::aid-job770>3.0.co;2-n

44.

Neck

C. P.

Manz

C. C.

(2013). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

45.

Nordenflycht

A. V.

(2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35, 155-174.

46.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

47.

Ogbonna

Harris

L. C.

(2000). Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: Empirical evidence from UK companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 766-788. doi:10.1080/09585190050075114

48.

Oke

Munshi

Walumbwa

F. O.

(2009). The influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities. Organizational Dynamics, 38, 64-72. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.10.005

49.

Oldham

G. R.

Cummings

(1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.

50.

Piccolo

R. F.

Bono

J. E.

Heinitz

Rowold

Duehr

Judge

T. A.

(2012). The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most? Leadership Quarterly, 23, 567-581. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.008

51.

Porter

L. W.

McLaughlin

G. B.

(2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? Leadership Quarterly, 17, 559-576.

52.

Richardson

H. A.

Simmering

M. J.

Sturman

M. C.

(2009). A tale of three perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 762-800. doi:10.1177/1094428109332834

53.

Roberts

H. E.

Foti

R. J.

(1998). Evaluating the interaction between self-leadership and work structure in predicting job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 257-267.

54.

Sarros

J. C.

Cooper

B. K.

Santora

J. C.

(2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 145-158. doi:10.1177/1548051808324100

55.

SelectUSA. (2017). Professional services spotlight: The professional services industry in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.selectusa.gov/professional-services-industry-united-states

56.

Shalley

C. E.

Gilson

L. L.

(2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33-53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004

57.

Starbuck

W. H.

(1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 713-740.

58.

Stewart

G. L.

Courtright

S. H.

Manz

C. C

. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37, 185-222. doi:10.1177/0149206310383911

59.

Stogdill

R. M.

(1963). Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire–Form XII. Columbus: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.

60.

Sundgren

Dimenäs

Gustafsson

J.-E.

Selart

(2005). Drivers of organizational creativity: A path model of creative climate in pharmaceutical R&D. R&D Management, 35, 359-374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00395.x

61.

Sundgren

Selart

Ingelgård

Bengtson

(2005). Dialogue-based evaluation as a creative climate indicator: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 84-98. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00328.x

62.

Tjosvold

(2008). The conflict-positive organization: it depends upon us. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 19-28. doi:10.1002/job.473

63.

van Knippenberg

Sitkin

S. B

. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic–transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1-60. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.759433

64.

Vroom

V. H.

Jago

A. G.

(2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17-24.

65.

Williams

L. J.

Hartman

Cavazotte

(2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 477-514. doi:10.1177/1094428110366036

66.

Williams

L. J.

McGonagle

(2016). Four research designs and a comprehensive analysis strategy for investigating common method variance with self-report measures using latent variables. Journal of Business & Psychology, 31, 339-359. doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9422-9

67.

Xenikou

Simosi

(2006). Organizational culture and transformational leadership as predictors of business unit performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 566-579. doi:10.1108/02683940610684409

68.

Yukl

Gordon

Taber

T. D.

(2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 15-32.