Team Composition,Distributed Leadership,and Performance: It’s Good to Share

Abstract

The contemporary work environment encourages new models of leadership that support influential behavior across teams. Leadership shared in this way improves team effectiveness and performance and is of interest to both scholars and practitioners. We examine shared leadership influences in the presence of other characteristics that distinguish teams, namely, team size and sex diversity. Using hierarchical multiple regression tests on information gathered from 241 teams during a strategy simulation exercise, we find evidence of a positive relationship between shared leadership and performance over and above the influence of team size and sex diversity. Additionally, we dimensionalize performance to examine impacts of team characteristics on different desirable outcomes and find that team size has a positive relationship with financial performance but a negative relationship with strategic performance. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

gender issues leadership leadership behavior leadership education and pedagogy networking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amason

A. C.

Shrader

R. C.

Tompson

G. H.

(2006). Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 125-148.

Arnone

Stumpf

S. A.

(2010). Shared leadership: From rivals to co-CEOs. Strategy & Leadership, 38(2), 15-21.

Ashkanasy

N. M.

Härtel

C. E.

Daus

C. S.

(2002). Diversity and emotion: The new frontiers in organizational behavior research. Journal of Management, 28, 307-338.

Audia

P. G.

Greve

H. R.

(2006). Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science, 52, 83-94.

Baixauli-Soler

J. S.

Belda-Ruiz

Sanchez-Marin

(2015). Executive stock options, gender diversity in the top management team, and firm risk taking. Journal of Business Research, 68, 451-463.

Balkundi

Kilduff

(2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941-961.

Bell

S. T.

Villado

A. J.

Lukasik

Belau

Briggs

(2011). Getting specific: A meta-analysis of the team demographic diversity and performance relationships. Journal of Management, 37, 709-743.

Bergman

J. Z.

Rentsch

J. R.

Small

E. E.

Davenport

S. W.

Bergman

S. M.

(2012). The shared leadership process in decision-making team. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 17-42.

Bigelow

J. D.

(1999). The web as an organizational behavior learning medium. Journal of Management Education, 23, 635-650.

10.

Bititci

Garengo

Dörfler

Nudurupati

(2012). Performance measurement: Challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 305-327.

11.

Blau

P. M.

(1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7). New York, NY: Free Press.

12.

Boies

Lvina

Martens

M. L.

(2010). Shared leadership and team performance in a business strategy simulation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 195-202.

13.

Bunderson

J. S.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

(2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 552-560.

14.

Campbell

W. K.

Sedikides

Reeder

G. D.

Elliot

A. J.

(2000). Among friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 229-239.

15.

Carpenter

M. A.

(2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275-284.

16.

Carson

J. B.

Tesluk

P. E.

Marrone

J. A.

(2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217-1234.

17.

Carter

D. A.

D’Souza

Simkins

B. J.

Simpson

W. G.

(2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 18, 396-414.

18.

Certo

S. T.

Lester

R. H.

Dalton

C. M.

Dalton

D. R.

(2006). Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 813-839.

19.

Chen

Lou

(2004). Students’ perceptions of peer evaluation: An expectancy perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 275-282.

20.

Clark

(2001). Virtual schools: Trends and issues: A study of virtual schools in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Western Regional Educational Laboratories.

21.

Cooper

Patel

P. C.

Thatcher

S. M.

(2013). It depends: Environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance. Organization Science, 25, 633-652.

22.

Cumming

Leung

T. Y.

Rui

(2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1572-1593.

23.

Dalton

D. R.

Daily

C. M.

Johnson

J. L.

Ellstrand

A. E.

(1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674-686.

24.

Day

D. V.

Gronn

Salas

(2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857-880.

25.

de Vries

M. F. K.

Korotov

. (2007). Creating transformational executive education programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 375-387.

26.

DeNisi

A. S.

Hitt

M. A.

Jackson

S. E.

(2003). The knowledge-based approach to sustainable competitive advantage. In Jackson

S. E.

Hitt

M. A.

DeNisi

A. S.

(Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management (pp. 3-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

27.

Dezsö

C. L.

Ross

D. G.

(2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1072-1089.

28.

Dickson

M. W.

Resick

C. J.

Hanges

P. J.

(2006). Systematic variation in organizationally-shared cognitive prototypes of effective leadership based on organizational form. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 487-505.

29.

D’Innocenzo

Mathieu

J. E.

Kukenberger

M. R.

(2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42, 1964-1991.

30.

Eastman

J. K.

Swift

C. O.

(2001). New horizons in distance education: The online learner-centered marketing class. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 25-34.

31.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

Schoonhoven

C. B.

(1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504-529.

32.

Ensley

M. D.

Hmieleski

K. M.

Pearce

C. L.

(2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217-231.

33.

Ensley

M. D.

Pearce

C. L.

(2001). Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 145-160.

34.

Erhardt

N. L.

Werbel

J. D.

Shrader

C. B.

(2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11, 102-111.

35.

Evans

M. G.

(1991). The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited. American Psychologist, 46, 6-15.

36.

Fletcher

(2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473-487.

37.

Francoeur

Labelle

Sinclair-Desgagné

(2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83-95.

38.

Gioia

D. A.

Brass

D. J.

(1985). Teaching the TV generation: The case for observational learning. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 10(2), 11-18.

39.

Grille

Schulte

E. M.

Kauffeld

(2015). Promoting shared leadership: A multilevel analysis investigating the role of prototypical team leader behavior, psychological empowerment, and fair rewards. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 324-339.

40.

Gujarati

D. N.

(2003). Basic econometrics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

41.

Gupta

Gregoriou

Healy

(2015). Forecasting bankruptcy for SMEs using hazard function: To what extent does size matter? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 45, 845-869.

42.

Gupta

V. K.

Huang

Niranjan

(2010). A longitudinal examination of the relationship between team leadership and performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 335-350.

43.

Highhouse

Gillespie

J. Z.

(2009). Do samples really matter that much? In Lance

C. E.

Vandenberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 247-265). New York, NY: Routledge.

44.

Hoch

J. E.

Dulebohn

J. H.

(2013). Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 114-125.

45.

Hogg

M. A.

(2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.

46.

Hon

Rensvold

(2006). An interactional perspective on perceived empowerment: The role of personal needs and task context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 959-982.

47.

Hood

A. C.

Bachrach

D. G.

Lewis

(2014). Transactive memory systems, conflict, size and performance in teams. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 11, 11-24.

48.

Hoogendoorn

Oosterbeek

van Praag

(2013). The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 59, 1514-1528.

49.

Horwitz

S. K.

(2005). The compositional impact of team diversity on performance: Theoretical considerations. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 219-245.

50.

Horwitz

S. K.

Horwitz

I. B.

(2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987-1015.

51.

Jackson

S. E.

Joshi

Erhardt

N. L.

(2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.

52.

Jehn

Rispens

Jonsen

Greer

(2013). Conflict contagion: A temporal perspective on the development of conflict within teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24, 352-373.

53.

Jin

Madison

Kraiczy

N. D.

Kellermanns

F. W.

Crook

T. R.

(2016). Entrepreneurial team composition characteristics and new venture performance: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/etap.12232

54.

Johnson

S. G.

Schnatterly

Hill

A. D.

(2012). Board composition beyond independence social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39, 232-262.

55.

Joshi

Knight

A. P.

(2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 59-84.

56.

Karriker

J. H.

(2005). Cyclical group development and interaction-based leadership emergence in autonomous teams: An integrated model. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 54-64.

57.

Karriker

J. H.

Aaron

J. R.

(2014). More than just fun and games: BSG and Glo-Bus as strategic education instruments. Journal of Management Education, 38, 768-775.

58.

Katz

Kahn

R. L.

(1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed,). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

59.

Knight

Durham

C. C.

Locke

E. A.

(2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 326-338.

60.

Kochan

Bezrukova

Ely

Jackson

Joshi

Jehn

. . .Thomas

(2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42, 3-21.

61.

Konrad

A. M.

Ritchie

J. E.

Jr. Lieb

Corrigall

(2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593-641.

62.

Kouzes

J. M.

Posner

B. Z.

(2009). To lead, create a shared vision. Harvard Business Review, 87, 20-21.

63.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Bell

B. S.

(2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman

W. C.

Ilgen

D. R.

Klimoski

R. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333-375). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

64.

Krishnan

H. A.

Park

(2005). A few good women—on top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1712-1720.

65.

Lechner

Dowling

(2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15, 1-26.

66.

Logan

Ganster

(2007). The effects of empowerment on attitudes and performance: The role of social support and empowerment beliefs. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1523-1550.

67.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

(2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.

68.

Mathieu

J. E.

Heffner

T. S.

Goodwin

G. F.

Salas

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

(2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.

69.

Mehra

Smith

B. R.

Dixon

A. L.

Robertson

(2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232-245.

70.

Nicolaides

V. C.

LaPort

K. A.

Chen

T. R.

Tomassetti

A. J.

Weis

E. J.

Zaccaro

S. J.

Cortina

J. M.

(2014). The shared leadership of teams: A meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 923-942.

71.

Ohland

M. W.

Loughry

M. L.

Woehr

D. J.

Bullard

L. G.

Felder

R. M.

Finelli

C. J.

. . .Schmucker

D. G.

(2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self-and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 609-630.

72.

Pastor

J. C.

Meindl

J. R.

Mayo

M. C.

(2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 410-420.

73.

Pearce

C. L.

(2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 47-57.

74.

Pearce

C. L.

Conger

J. A.

(2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

75.

Pearce

C. L.

Herbik

P. A.

(2004). Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: The effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived team support, and team size. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 293-310.

76.

Pearce

C. L.

Manz

C. C.

(2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self-and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 130-140.

77.

Pearce

C. L.

Sims

H. P.

(2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172-197.

78.

Pearce

C. L.

Yoo

Alavi

(2004). Leadership, social work and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership in the nonprofit sector. In Riggio

Smith-Orr

(Eds.), Nonprofit leadership (pp. 180-203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

79.

Pitcher

Smith

A. D.

(2001). Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organization Science, 12, 1-18.

80.

Post

Byron

(2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1546-1571.

81.

Proserpio

Gioia

D. A.

(2007). Teaching the virtual generation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 69-80.

82.

Rassuli

Manzer

J. P.

(2005). “Teach us to learn”: Multivariate analysis of perception of success in team learning. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 21-27.

83.

Ray

J. L.

Smith

A. D.

(2012). Using photographs to research organizations: Evidence, considerations, and application in a field study. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 288-315.

84.

Redpath

(2012). Confronting the bias against on-line learning in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 125-140.

85.

Rentsch

J. R.

Klimoski

R. J.

(2001). Why do “great minds” think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 107-120.

86.

Richard

P. J.

Devinney

T. M.

Yip

G. S.

Johnson

(2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35, 718-804.

87.

Rooke

Torbert

W. R.

(2005). Seven transformations of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83, 66-76.

88.

Rousseau

M. B.

Mathias

B. D.

Madden

L. T.

Crook

T. R.

(2016). Innovation, firm performance, and appropriation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(3), 1-29.

89.

Rowold

(2011). Relationship between leadership behaviors and performance: The moderating role of a work team’s level of age, gender, and cultural heterogeneity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32, 628-647.

90.

Seibert

S. E.

Wang

Courtright

S. H

. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 981-1003.

91.

Simons

Pelled

L. H.

Smith

K. A.

(1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662-673.

92.

Simsek

Veiga

J. F.

Lubatkin

M. H.

Dino

R. N.

(2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 69-84.

93.

Sivasubramaniam

Murry

W. D.

Avolio

B. J.

Jung

D. I.

(2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27, 66-96.

94.

Strijbos

J. W.

Sluijsmans

(2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 265-269.

95.

Taggar

Brown

T. C.

(2006). Interpersonal affect and peer rating bias in teams. Small Group Research, 37, 87-111.

96.

Thompson

A. A.

Stappenbeck

G. J.

Reidenbach

M. A.

Thrasher

I. F.

Harms

C. C.

(2013). Glo-Bus: Developing winning competitive strategies. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

97.

van den Berg

Admiraal

Pilot

. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19-36.

98.

van Dijk

Meyer

van Engen

Loyd

. (2016). Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1). Retrieved from https://aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/Annals/ANNALS-2014-0046.R3.pdf

99.

van Knippenberg

Mell

J. N

. (2016). Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 135-145.

100.

Vera

Crossan

(2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29, 222-240.

101.

Wang

Waldman

D. A.

Zhang

(2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 181-198.

102.

Weiss

Hoegl

(2015). Effects of relative team size on teams with innovative tasks: An understaffing theory perspective. Organizational Psychology Review, 6, 324-351.

103.

Woehr

D. J.

(1994). Understanding frame-of-reference training: The impact of training on the recall of performance information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 525-534.

104.

Yammarino

F. J.

Salas

Serban

Shirreffs

Shuffler

M. L.

(2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 382-402.