We proposed and found that employees’ judgments of responsibility and accountability are distinct but positively related constructs. Using attribution theory for responsibility judgments and lay dispositionalism for accountability judgments, we hypothesized that employees hold others more responsible (i.e., causal) and accountable (i.e., punishable) than they hold themselves for the same workplace mistakes. Independent mean differences within a sample of 286 working adults revealed that people held others more responsible but not more accountable than they held themselves. Post hoc analyses revealed a counterintuitive finding. Counter to what theory would predict, as workplace mistake seriousness increased the variation between self-judgement and other-judgment decreased. Implications and future directions for accountability research are discussed.
BalcatisD.DunningD. (2008). A mile in moccasins: How situational experience reduces dispositionism in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 102-114.
2.
BazinskaR.WojciszkeB. (1996). Drawing inferences on moral and competence-related traits from the same behavioural information. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 293-299.
3.
BergsteinerH.AveryG. C. (2003). Responsibility and accountability: Towards an integrative process model. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 2, 31-40.
4.
BergsteinerH.AveryG. C. (2010). A theoretical responsibility and accountability framework for CSR and global responsibility. Journal of Global Responsibility, 1, 8-33.
5.
BreesJ.MackeyJ.MartinkoM.HarveyP. (2014). Damage control after breaches of ethical conduct: An attributional approach to accounting for unethical behavior. In ValentineS. (Ed.), Organizational ethics and stakeholder well-being in the business environment (pp. 95-113). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
6.
CarlsmithK. M.DarleyJ. M.RobinsonP. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284-299.
7.
ChenY.Blanchard-FieldsF. (1997). Age differences in stages of attributional processing. Psychology and Aging, 12, 694-703.
8.
CummingsL.AntonR. (1990). The logical and appreciative dimensions of accountability. In SrivastvaS.CooperriderD. & Associates (Eds.), Appreciative management and leadership (pp. 257-286). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
DubnickM. J. (2003). Accountability and ethics: Reconsidering the relationships. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 6, 405-441.
10.
DunningD. (2005). Self-insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
11.
DunningD.GriffinD. W.MilojkovicJ. H.RossL. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 568-592.
12.
FrinkD. D.HallA. T.PerrymanA. A.RanftA. L.HochwarterW. A.FerrisG. R.RoyleM. T. (2008). Meso-level theory of accountability in organizations. In MartocchioJ. J. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 27, pp. 177-245). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
13.
FrinkD. D.KlimoskiR. J. (1998). Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management. In FerrisG. R. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 1-51). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
14.
FukamiC. V.HopkinsD. M. (1993). The role of situational factors in disciplinary judgments. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 665-676.
15.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
16.
JonesE. E.DavisK. E. (1965). A theory of correspondent inferences: From acts to dispositions. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
17.
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
18.
KelleyH. J. (1973). The process of causal attributions. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
19.
KrugerJ.GilovichT. (2004). Actions and intentions in self-assessment: The road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 328-339.
20.
LernerJ.TetlockP. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
21.
MartinkoM. J. (2002). Thinking like a winner: A guide to high performance leadership. Tallahassee, FL: Gulf Coast.
22.
MartinkoM. J.DouglasS. C.HarveyP. (2006a). Attribution theory in industrial and organizational psychology: A review. In HodgkinsonG. P.FordJ. K. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 127-187). Chichester, England: Wiley.
MartinkoM. J.GardnerW. L. (1987). The leader-member attribution process. Academy of Management Review, 12, 235-249.
25.
MartinkoM. J.HarveyP.DouglasS. C. (2007). The role, function, and contributions of attribution theory to leadership: A review. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 561-585.
26.
MezulisA. H.AbramsonL. Y.HydeJ. S.HankinB. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711-747.
27.
MitchellT. R.KalbL. S. (1982). Effects of job experience on supervisor attributions for a subordinate’s poor performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 181-188.
28.
NisbettR. E.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
RossL.NisbettR. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
30.
SchlenkerB. R. (1985). Identity and self-identification. In SchlenkerB. R. (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 15-99). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
SchlenkerB. R. (1987). Threats to identity: Self-identification and social stress. In SnyderC. R.FordC. (Eds.), Clinical and social psychological perspectives on negative life events (pp. 273-321). New York, NY: Academic Press.
32.
SchlenkerB. R.BrittT. W.PenningtonJ.MurphyR.DohertyK. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632-652.
33.
SchlenkerB. R.WeigoldM. F. (1989). Self-identification and accountability. In GiacoloneR. A.RosenfeldP. (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 21-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
SnyderC. (1985). The excuse: An amazing grace? In SchlenkerB. R. (Eds.), The self and social life (pp. 235-260). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
35.
TetlockP. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 297-332.
36.
WeinerB. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
37.
WeinerB. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation of a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
WeinerB. (2004). Social motivation and moral emotion: An attributional perspective. In MartinkoM. J. (Ed.), Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: Theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 5-24). Greenwich, CT: InformationAge.
39.
WhiteR. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
