Organizational researchers widely acknowledge that positive relational behavior is associated with leadership effectiveness. In this exploratory study, we seek to extend previous research examining contextual factors that influence leadership style based on the characteristics of person–vocation fit. Using information derived from a 360° assessment that included one’s top managers, peers, and subordinates (N = 934), we find that leaders working in settings that attract Holland’s Social (S) types demonstrate more positive relational behavior than those who work in Realistic (R) type work settings. Our research also indicates that the relationship between leadership style and perceived effectiveness varies based on the work interests shared by individuals who are attracted to different vocational settings. One style of leadership does not fit all work contexts, and the person–vocation fit framework can help explain what comprises effective leadership style in different contexts.
AlaristaJ.ArrowsmithJ. (2004). Managing employee commitment in the not-for-profit sector. Personal Review, 33, 536-548.
2.
AnthoneyS. F.ArmstrongP. I. (2010). Individuals and environments: Linking ability and skill ratings with interests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 36-51.
3.
AntonakisJ.AvolioB. J.SivasubramaniamN. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261-295.
4.
ArmstrongP. I.RoundsJ. (2010). Integrating individual differences in career assessment: The atlas model of individual differences and the strong ring. Career Development Journal, 59, 143-153.
5.
AronoffJ.WilsonJ. P. (1985). Personality in the social process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
AvolioB. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62, 25-33.
7.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 199-218.
8.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. T. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.
9.
AvioloB. J.WalumbwaF. O.WeberT. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
10.
BalkundiP.KilduffM. (2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941-961.
11.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.GuptaR. (2003). Meta-analysis between the relationship of the five factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45-74.
12.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.JudgeT. A. (2001). The FFM personality dimensions and job performance: Meta-analysis of meta-analyses. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
13.
BassB. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
BlakeR. R.MoutonJ. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
15.
ChanK.RoundsJ.DrasgowF. (2000). The relation between vocational interest and motivation to lead. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 226-245.
16.
ChevertonJ. (2007). Holding our own: Value and performance in nonprofit organizations. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42, 427-436.
17.
ChiN.PanS. (2012). A multilevel investigation of missing links between transformational leadership and task performance: The mediating roles of perceived person-job fit and person-organization fit. Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 43-56.
18.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003), Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909-927.
21.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEOFFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Review.
22.
De CremerD.DeWitteS. (2002). Effects of trust and accountability in mixed-motive situations. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 541-543.
23.
De FruytF.MervieldeI. (2006). RIASEC types and big five traits as predictors of employment status and nature of employment. Personnel Psychology, 52, 701-727.
24.
DeckopJ. R.CirkaC. C. (2000). The risk and reward of a double-edged sword: Effects of a merit pay program on intrinsic motivation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 400-418.
25.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in Leadership meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
26.
EdwardsJ. A. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In CooperC. L.RobertsonI. T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 283-357). Oxford, England: John Wiley.
27.
EmeryF. E.TristE. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32.
28.
FairhurstJ. A.RogersL. E. (1989). Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 773-802.
29.
FiedlerF. E. (1984). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 149-190.
30.
GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J.LuthansR.MayD. R.WalumbwaF. O. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372.
31.
GeorgeB.SimsP.McLeanA. N.MayerD. (2007). Discovering your authentic leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 129-138.
32.
GerbingD. W.AndersonJ. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186-192.
33.
GilbertG. R. (2009). Leadership effectiveness assessment. Port St. Lucie, FL: Gilbertems LLC.
34.
GilbertG. R.HydeA. C. (1988). Followership and the federal worker. Public Administration Review, 48, 962-968.
35.
GilbertG. R.SohiR. S.McEachernA. G. (2008). Measuring work performance: A multidimensional tool to enhance career self-management. Career Development International. 13(1), 56-78.
36.
GilstrapJ.CollinsB. J. (2012). The importance of being trustworthy: Trust as a mediator of the relationship between leader behaviors and employee job satisfaction. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19, 152-163.
37.
GouletL. R.FrankM. L. (2002). Organizational commitment across three sectors: Public, non-profit, and for-profit. Public Personnel Management, 31, 201-210.
38.
HairJ. F.Jr.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39.
HansenJ. R.VilladsenA. R. (2010). Comparing public and private managers’ leadership styles: Understanding the role of job context. International Public Management Journal, 13, 247-274.
40.
HawkinsJ.DulewiczV. (2009). Relationship between leadership style, the degree of change experiences, performance and follower commitment in policing. Journal of Change Management, 9, 251-270.
41.
HetlandH.SandalG. M.JohnsenT. B. (2008). Personality and leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 322-331.
42.
HochwarterW. A.KiewitzC.GundlachM. J.StonerJ. (2004). The impact of vocational and social efficacy on job performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(3), 27-40.
43.
HoganR.CurphyG. J.HoganJ. (1994). What we know about leadership effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.
44.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
45.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
46.
IliesR.MorgesonF. P.NahrgangJ. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373-394.
47.
JepsonD. (2009). Leadership context: The importance of departments. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 30(1), 36-52.
48.
JohansoozJ. (2006). Organization-stakeholder relationships: Exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development, 25, 942-955.
49.
JuddM. H.LeschinskyR.GagnonM. A. (2006). Production employee performance at a furniture manufacturer: The importance of supportive supervisors. Forest Products Journal, 56(6), 19-24.
50.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768.
51.
KathrinsR. (2007). The relationship of leadership style and types of organizational cultures to the effectiveness and employee satisfaction in acute care hospitals. Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations and Theses database. (Publication No. AAT 3252355)
52.
KatzD.MaccobyN.MorseN. C. (1950). Productivity, supervision and morale in an office situation. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Centre.
53.
KernisM. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.
54.
Kristof-BrownA. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
55.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
56.
LeidnerR. (1993). Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
57.
LingY.SimsekZ.LuatkinM. H.ViegaJ. F. (2008). The impact of transformational CEOs on the performance of small-to-medium-sized firms: Does organizational context matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 923-934.
58.
McCarthyA. M.GaravanT. N. (2001). 360° feedback process: Performance, improvement and employee career development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(1), 5-32.
59.
McCloyR. A.CampbellJ. P.CudekR. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 493-505.
60.
McShaneS. L.Von GlinowM. A. (Eds.). (2007). Organizational behavior. New York, NY: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
61.
MowdayR. T.PorterL. W.SteersR. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press.
62.
NyeC. D.SuR.RoundsJ.DrasgowF. (2012). Vocational interests and performance: A qualitative summary over 60 years of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 384-403.
63.
PlutaP. L.FieldsT. J.SmithA. J. (2010). Compliance case study #3: Manual processes, performance, responsibilities, and training. Journal of GXP Compliance, 14(1), 37-43.
64.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
65.
PorterL. W.McLaughlinG. B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather?Leadership Quarterly, 17, 559-576.
66.
RoundsJ.DawisR.LofquistL. (1987). Measurement of person-environment fit and prediction of satisfaction in the theory of work adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 297-318.
67.
ShamirB.HowellJ. M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 257-284.
68.
SpokaneA. R.LuchettaE. J.RichwineM. H. (2002). Holland’s theory of personalities in work environments. In BrownD. (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 373-426). New York, NY: Wiley.
69.
StinchcombeA. L. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
70.
StogdillR. M. (1969). Validity of leader behavior descriptions. Personnel Psychology, 22, 153-158.
71.
SullivanB. A.HansenJ. C. (2004). Evidence of construct validity of the interest scales on the Campbell Interest and Skill Survey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 179-202.
72.
SuperD. E. (1953). Theory of vocational development. American Psychologist, 8, 185-190.
73.
ThamP.MeagherG. (2009). Working in human services: How do experiences and working conditions in child welfare social work compare. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 807-827.
74.
TosiH. L. (1991). The organization as a context for leadership theory: A multilevel approach. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 205-228.
75.
Van EronA. M.BurkeW. W. (1992). The transformation/transactional leadership model: A study of critical components. In ClarkK. E.ClarkM. B.CampbellD. P. (Eds.), Impact of leadership (pp. 149-167). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
76.
Van IddekingeC. H.RothP. L.PutkaD. J.LanivichS. E. (2011). Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1167-1194.
77.
Van VianenA. E. M. (2000). Person-organization fit: The match between newcomers’ and recruiters preferences for organizational cultures. Personnel Psychology, 33, 113-149.
78.
Van WartM. (2003). Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63, 214-228.
79.
ViningA. R. (2011). Public agency external analysis using a modified “five forces” framework. International Public Management Journal, 14(1), 63-105.
80.
WalumbwaF. O.AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WernsingT. S.PetersonS. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89-126.
