We contribute to the undeveloped understanding of ambidexterity at the individual level by studying how leadership is related to individual ambidexterity and how this is related to cognitive strain. Data from 179 managers indicate a positive interrelation between superiors’ transformational leadership and individual ambidexterity. We also find a manager’s level of ambidexterity to be positively related to cognitive strain. This relationship is positively moderated by a manager’s level of conscientiousness and negatively moderated by a manager’s level of openness to experience.
AdlerP. S.GoldoftasB.LevineD. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10, 43-68.
AndriopoulosC.LewisM. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20, 696-717.
4.
AudiaP. G.GoncaloJ. A. (2007). Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Science, 53(1), 1-15.
5.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (1991). The full range of leadership development: Basic and advanced manuals. Binghamton, NY: Bass, Avolio & Associates.
6.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
7.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
8.
BashirU.RamayM. I. (2010). Impact of stress on employees job performance: A study on banking sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(1), 122-126.
9.
BassB. M.AvolioB. (2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
BeehrT. A.NewmanJ. E. (1978). Job stress, employee health and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysis, model and literature review. Personnel Psychology, 31, 665-699.
12.
BennerM. J.TushmanM. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256.
13.
BersonY.NemanichL. A.WaldmanD. A.GalvinB. M.KellerR. T. (2006). Leadership and organizational learning: A multiple levels perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 577-594.
14.
BierlyP. E.DamanpourF.SantoroM. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 481-509.
15.
BlieseP. D.CastroC. A. (2000). Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support. Work & Stress, 14(1), 65-73.
16.
BorkenauP.OstendorfF. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Handanweisung [NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory according Costa and McCrae. Manual]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
17.
BradyT.DaviesA. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25, 1601-1621.
18.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing equation model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp.136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86.
CaoQ.SimsekZ.ZhangH. (2010). Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1272-1296.
22.
CarmeliA.HaleviM. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 207-218.
23.
ChangY.-Y.HughesM. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30, 1-17.
24.
ChangY.-Y.HughesM.HothoS. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49, 1658-1676.
25.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1994). Fortune favours the prepared firm. Management Science, 40, 227-251.
CrossanM. M.LaneH. W.WhiteR. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.
28.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
29.
CurrieG.ProcterS. J. (2005). The antecedents of middle managers’ strategic contribution: The case of a professional bureaucracy. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1325-1356.
30.
DayD. V.AntonakisJ. (2012). Leadership: Past, present, and future. In DayD. V.AntonakisJ. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (2nd ed., pp. 3-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
DenisonD. R.HooijbergR.QuinnR. E. (1995). Paradox of performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6, 524-540.
32.
EdwardsJ. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100.
33.
FanX.SivoS. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343-367.
34.
FelfeJ. (2006). Validierung einer deutschen Version des “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire” (MLQ Form 5x Short) von Bass und Avolio (1995) [Validation of a German version of the “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire” (MLQ Form 5x Short) of Bass and Avolio (1995)]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 61-78.
35.
FelfeJ.GoihlK. (2002). Deutsche überarbeitete und ergänzte Version des Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) [German revised and supplemented version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ)]. In Glöckner-RistA. (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. Version 5.00. Mannheim, Germany: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.
36.
FiolC. M.O’ConnorE. J.AguinisH. (2001). All for one and one for all? The development and transfer of power across organizational levels. Academy of Management Review, 26, 224-242.
37.
FloydS.LaneP. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25, 154-177.
38.
FloydS. W.WooldridgeB. (1992). Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 153-167.
39.
FloydS. W.WooldridgeB. (1994). Dinosaurs or dynamos? Recognising middle management’s strategic role. Academy of Management Executive, 8(4), 47-57.
40.
García-MoralesV. J.Lloréns-MontesF. J.Verdú-JoverA. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management, 19, 299-319.
41.
García-MoralesV. J.Matias-RecheF.Hurtado-TorresN. (2008). Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 188-212.
42.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
43.
GibsonC. B.BirkinshawJ. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
44.
GillespieN. A.MannL. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 588-607.
45.
GuptaA. K.SmithK. G.ShalleyC. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693-706.
46.
HeZ. L.WongP. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494.
47.
HoganJ.BarrettP.HoganR. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1270-1285.
48.
HoganJ.OnesD. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849-870). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49.
HolmqvistM. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15, 70-81.
50.
HoonC. (2007). Committees as strategic practice: The role of strategic conversation in a public administration. Human Relations, 60, 921-952.
51.
HouseR. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352.
52.
IliesR.ArveyR. D.BouchardT. J.Jr. (2006). Darwinism, behavioral genetics, and organizational behavior: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 121-141.
53.
JamalM. (1985). Relationship of job stress to job performance: A study of managers and blue-collar workers. Human Relations, 38, 409-424.
54.
JansenJ. J. P.GeorgeG.Van den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 982-1007.
55.
JansenJ. J. P.VeraD.CrossanM. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 5-18.
56.
JungD.WuA.ChowC. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs’ transformational leadership on firm innovation. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 582-594.
57.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
58.
KruegerR. F.JohnsonW.KlingK. C. (2006). Behavior genetics and personality development. In MroczekD. K.LittleT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 81-108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
Laureiro-MartínezD.BrusoniS.ZolloM. (2010). The neuroscientific foundations of the exploration-exploitation dilemma. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 3, 95-115.
60.
LavieD.StettnerU.TushmanM. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 109-155.
61.
LawrenceK. A.LenkA.QuinnR. E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 87-102.
62.
LernerD.AdlerD. A.RogersW. H.HongC.LapitskyL.McLaughlinT.ReedJ. (2010). Work performance of employees with depression: The impact of work stressors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 24, 205-213.
63.
LeungM. Y.ChanY. S.OlomolaiyeP. (2008). Impact of stress on the performance of construction project managers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134, 644-652.
64.
LevinthalD. A.MarchJ. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
65.
LewinA. Y.LongC. P.CarrollT. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10, 535-550.
66.
LiY.VanhaverbekeW.SchoenmaakersW. (2008). Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 107-126.
67.
LiuW. (2006). Knowledge exploitation, knowledge exploration, and competency trap. Knowledge and Process Management, 13, 144-161.
68.
LubatkinM. H.SimsekZ.LingY.VeigaJ. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646-672.
69.
MantereS. (2008). Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 294-316.
70.
MarchJ.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
71.
MartinL. L.TesserA. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In WyerR. S. (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts. Advances in social cognition (Vol. 9, pp. 1-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72.
McCraeR. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337.
73.
MohrG.MüllerA.RigottiT. (2005). Normwerte der Skala zur Irritation: Zwei Dimensionen psychischer Beanspruchung [Normal values of the Irritation-Scale: Two dimensions of strain]. Diagnostica, 51(1), 12-20.
74.
MohrG.MüllerA.RigottiT.AycanZ.TschanF. (2006). The assessment of psychological strain in work contexts. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 198-206.
75.
MomT. J. M. (2006). Managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of organizational factors and knowledge inflows (Doctoral dissertation). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands.
76.
MomT. J. M.Van Den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 910-931.
77.
MomT. J. M.Van Den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 812-828.
78.
MorgesonF. P.HofmannD. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.
79.
NemanichL. A.VeraD. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 19-33.
80.
O’ReillyC. A.TushmanM. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74-81.
81.
O’ReillyC. A.TushmanM. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
82.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
83.
ProbstG.RaischS.TushmanM. L. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders. Organizational Dynamics, 40, 326-334.
84.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ. (2008). Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375-409.
85.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ.ProbstG.TushmanM. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685-695.
86.
RobertsB. W.BoggT.WaltonK. E.ChernyshenkoO. S.Stephen StarkE. (2004). A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 1664-1678.
87.
RosingK.FreseM.BauschA. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956-974.
88.
RouleauL.BalogunJ. (2011). Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 953-983.
89.
RowoldJ.HeinitzK. (2007). Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 121-133.
90.
SarrosJ. C.CooperB. K.SantoraJ. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 145-158.
91.
SidhuJ. S.VolberdaH. W.CommandeurH. R. (2004). Exploring exploration orientation and its determinants: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 913-932.
92.
SidhuJ. S.CommandeurH. R.VolberdaH. W. (2007). The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18, 20-38.
93.
SimsekZ. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 597-624.
94.
SimsekZ.HeaveyC.VeigaJ.SouderD. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualisations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 864-894.
95.
SmithW. K.TushmanM. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522-536.
StamperC. L.JohlkeM. C. (2003). The impact of perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work outcomes. Journal of Management, 29, 569-588.
98.
StockeV. (2001). Socially desirable response behavior as rational choice: The case of attitudes towards foreigners (Working Paper No. 01-22). Mannheim, Germany: University of Mannheim.
99.
TaylorA.HelfatC. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 20, 718-739.
100.
TisakJ.SmithC. S. (1994). Defending and extending difference score methods. Journal of Management, 20, 675-682.
101.
TrapnellP. D. (1994). Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8, 273-290.
102.
TripsasM.GavettiG. (2000). Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 119-142.
103.
TushmanM. L.SmithW. K.BinnsA. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 74-80.
104.
VeraD.CrossanM. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29, 222-240.
105.
VossG. B.SiredeshmukhD.VossZ. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on products exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 147-164.
106.
WeiblerJ.KellerT. (2011). Ambidextrie in Abhängigkeit von Führungsverantwortung und Marktwahrnehmung: Eine empirische Analyse des individuellen Arbeitsverhaltens in Unternehmen [Ambidexterity in reference to managerial responsibility and market perception: An empirical investigation of individual work behavior]. zfbf—Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 63(1), 155-188.
107.
WittL. A.BurkeL. A.BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 164-169.
