The purpose of this study is to examine the cross-cultural validity of self-leadership by confirming a second-order factor structure and testing for measurement invariance in the operationalization of the self-leadership construct across four distinct national cultures: the United States, China, Germany, and Portugal. Results provide evidence in support of the cross-cultural validity of the hierarchical factor structure of self-leadership and in support of partial metric measurement invariance for the Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire (RSLQ). Taken together, these findings suggest that future researchers examining substantive self-leadership hypotheses within and across non-U.S. cultures may proceed with confidence.
AdlerN. (1997). Global leadership: Women leaders. Management International Review, 37(1), 171-196.
2.
AlvesJ.LovelaceK.ManzC.MatsypuraD.ToyasakiF.KeK. (2006). A cross-cultural perspective of self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 338-359.
3.
AndersonJ. S.PrussiaG. E. (1997). The Self-Leadership Questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4, 119-143.
4.
AndreßenP.KonradtU. (2007). Messung von selbstführung: Psychometrische überprüfung der deutschsprachigen version des Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire[Measurement of self-management: Psychometric review of the German version of the Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire]. Zeitschrift Für Personalpsychologie, 6(3), 117-128.
5.
AndreßenP.KonradtU.NeckC. P. (2012). The relation between self-leadership and transformational leadership: Competing models and the moderating role of virtuality. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 68-82.
6.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
7.
BentlerP. M.BonnettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
8.
BlanchardK. (1995). Points of power can help self-leadership. Manage, 46, 12.
9.
BlountP.JonesM. (1997). Exploring the limits of Western leadership theory in East Asia and Africa. Personnel Review, 26(1/2), 6-23.
10.
BollenK. A. (1989a). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303-316.
11.
BollenK. A. (1989b). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
12.
BryantA.KazanA. L. (2013). Self-leadership: How to become a more successful, efficient, and effective leader from the inside out. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13.
ByrneB. M.WatkinsD. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155-175.
14.
BurnsD. D. (1980). Feeling good: The new mood therapy. New York, NY: William Morrow.
15.
CarmeliA.MeitarR.WeisbergJ. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27, 75-90.
16.
CautelaJ. R. (1969). Behavior therapy and self-control: Techniques and applications. In FranksC. M. (Ed.), Behavioral therapy: Appraisal and status (pp. 323-340). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25(1), 1-27.
18.
ChungA.ChenI.LeeA.ChenH.LinY. (2011). Charismatic leadership and self-leadership: A relationship of substitution or supplementation in the contexts of internalization and identification?Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 299-313.
19.
CoxJ. F. (1993). The effects of superleadership training on leader behavior, subordinate self-leadership behavior, and subordinate citizenship (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
20.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1992). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
21.
CurralL.Marques-QuinteiroP. (2009). Self-leadership and work role innovation: Testing a mediation model with goal orientation and work motivation. Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 25, 165-176.
22.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
23.
DicksonM. W.Den HartogD. N.MitchelsonJ. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 729-768.
24.
DiLielloT. C.HoughtonJ. D. (2006). Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future: Toward a model of self-leadership, innovation and creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 319-337.
25.
D’IntinoR. S.GoldsbyM. G.HoughtonJ. D.NeckC. P. (2007). Self-leadership: A process for entrepreneurial success. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 105-120.
26.
DruckerP. F. (2005). Peter F. Drucker on self-leadership. Leadership Excellence, 22(6), 13-14.
27.
EllisA. (1977). The basic clinical theory of rational-emotive therapy. New York, NY: Springer.
28.
FinkeR. A. (1989). Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
FurtnerM. R.BaldeggerU.RauthmannJ. F. (2013). Leading yourself and leading others: Linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 436-439 .
30.
FurtnerM. R.RauthmannJ. F. (2010). Relations between self-leadership and scores on the big five. Psychological Reports, 107(2), 339-353.
31.
FurtnerM. R.RauthmannJ. F.SachseP. (2010). The socioemotionally intelligent self-leader: Examining relations between self-leadership and socioemotional intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(9), 1191-1196.
32.
FurtnerM. R.RauthmannJ. F.SachseP. (2011). The self-loving self-leader: An examination of the relationship between self-leadership and the dark triad. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(3), 369-380.
33.
GeorgiannaS. (2007). Self-leadership: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 569-589.
34.
GuzzoR. A. (1998). Leadership, self-management, and levels of analysis. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches, classical and new wave (pp. 213-219). Stanford, CT: JAI.
35.
HauschildtK.KonradtU. (2012). Self-leadership and team members’ work role performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 497-517.
36.
HoJ.NesbitP. L. (2009). A refinement and extension of the self-leadership scale for the Chinese context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 450-476.
37.
HoJ.NesbitP. L.JepsenD.DemirianS. (2012). Extending self-leadership research to the East: Measurement equivalence of the Chinese and English versions of the MSLQ. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(2), 101-111.
38.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
HornJ. L. (1991). Comments on “issues in factorial invariance.” In CollinsL. M.HornJ. L. (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change (pp. 114-125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117-144.
41.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J.MasonR. (1983, Summer-Fall). When is invariance not invariant: A practical scientist’s look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist, 1, 179-188.
42.
HoughtonJ. D.BonhamT. W.NeckC. P.SinghK. (2004). The Relationship between self-leadership and personality: A comparison of hierarchical factor structures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 427-441.
43.
HoughtonJ. D.DawleyD.DiLielloT. C. (2012). The Abbreviated Self-Leadership Questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 216-232.
44.
HoughtonJ. D.JinkersonD. L. (2007). Constructive thought strategies and job satisfaction: A preliminary examination. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 45-53.
45.
HoughtonJ. D.NeckC. P. (2002). The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691.
46.
HoughtonJ. D.NeckC. P.ManzC. C. (2003). We think we can, we think we can, we think we can: the impact of thinking patterns and self-efficacy on work team sustainability. Team Performance Management, 9(1/2), 31-41.
47.
HoughtonJ. D.YohoS. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged?Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.
48.
HouseR.JavidianM.HangesP.DorfmanP. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37, 3-10.
49.
HoyleR. H.PanterA. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
JöreskogK.SörbomD. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago, IL: National Educational Resources.
51.
KerrS.JermierJ. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 22, 375-403.
52.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
53.
KonradtU.AndreßenP.EllwartT. (2009). Self-leadership in organizational teams: A multi-level analysis of moderators and mediators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 322-346.
54.
LastovickaJ. L. (1982). On the validation of lifestyle traits: A review and illustration. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(1), 126-138.
55.
LittleT.CunninghamW.ShaharG.WidamanK. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
56.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57.
ManzC. C. (1983). The art of self-leadership: Strategies for personal effectiveness in your life and work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.
ManzC. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585-600.
59.
ManzC. C. (1991). Leading employees to be self-managing and beyond: Toward the establishment of self-leadership in organizations. Journal of Management Systems, 3, 15-24.
60.
ManzC. C.NeckC. P. (1991). Inner leadership: Creating productive thought patterns. Executive, 5, 87-95.
61.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P.Jr. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5, 361-367.
62.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P.Jr. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
63.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P.Jr. (1991). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 18-35.
64.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P.Jr. (2001). New superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
65.
MarkhamS. E.MarkhamI. S. (1995). Self-management and self-leadership reexamined: A levels of analysis perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 343-359.
66.
MarkhamS. E.MarkhamI. S. (1998). Self-management and self-leadership reexamined: A levels of analysis perspective. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches, classical and new wave (pp. 193-210). Stanford, CT: JAI.
67.
Marques-QuinteiroP.CurralL. A.PassosA. M. (2011). Adapting the Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire to the Portuguese context. Social Indicators Research, 108, 553-564.
MeadeA. W.KroustalisC. M. (2006). Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3), 369-403.
70.
MilfontT. L.FischerR. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111-121.
71.
MüllerG. F. (2006). Dimensions of self-leadership: A German replication and extension. Psychological Reports, 99, 357-362.
72.
NahavandiA. (2012). The art and science of leadership (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
73.
NeckC. P.HoughtonJ. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270-295.
74.
NeckC. P.LattimerC. L.HoughtonJ. D. (2014). Management. New York, NY: Wiley.
75.
NeckC. P.ManzC. C. (1992). Thought self-leadership: The impact of self-talk and mental imagery on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 681-699.
76.
NeckC. P.ManzC. C. (1996). Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee cognition, behavior, and affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 445-467.
77.
NeckC. P.ManzC. C. (2013). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
78.
NeckC. P.NeckH. M.ManzC. C. (1997). Thought self-leadership: Mind management for entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2, 25-36.
79.
NeckC. P.NeckH. M.ManzC. C.GodwinJ. (1999). “I think I can; I think I can”: A self-leadership perspective toward enhancing entrepreneurial thought patterns, self-efficacy, and performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 477-501.
80.
NeckC. P.NouriH.GodwinJ. L. (2003). How self-leadership affects the goal setting process. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 691-708.
81.
NeubertM. J.WuJ. C. (2006). A cross-cultural validation of the Houghton and Neck self-leadership measure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 360-373.
82.
PearceC. L.ManzC. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self- and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 130-140.
83.
PrussiaG. E.AndersonJ. S.ManzC. C. (1998). Self-leadership and performance outcomes: The mediating influence of self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 523-538.
84.
RockD. A.WertsC. E.FlaugherR. L. (1978). The use of analysis of covariance structures for comparing the psychometric properties of multiple variables across populations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13(4), 403-418.
85.
SassD.SmithP. (2006). The effects of parceling unidimensional scales on structural parameter estimates in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 566-586.
86.
SchermerhornJ. R.OsbornR. N.Uhl-BienM.HuntJ. G. (2012). Organizational behavior (12th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
87.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1991). Learned optimism. New York, NY: Knopf.
88.
SimsH. P.Jr.ManzC. C. (1996). Company of heroes: Unleashing the power of self-leadership. New York, NY: John Wiley.
89.
SteenkampJ.BenedictE. M.BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-107.
90.
StewartG. L.CarsonK. P.CardyR. L. (1996). The joint effects of conscientiousness and self-leadership training on self-directed behavior in a service setting. Personnel Psychology, 49, 143-164.
91.
StewartG. L.CourtrightS. H.ManzC. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185-222.
92.
TekleabA. G.SimsH.YunS.TeslukP. E.CoxJ. (2008). Are we on the same page? Effects of self-awareness of empowering and transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(3), 185-201.
93.
ThoresenC. E.MahoneyM. J. (1974). Behavioral self-control. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
94.
Uhl-BienM.MarionR. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 631-650.
95.
Uhl-BienM.MarionR.McKelveyB. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318.
96.
vandeVijverF. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.
98.
WaitleyD. (1995). Empires of the mind: Lessons to lead and succeed in a knowledge-based world. New York, NY: William Morrow.
