This study examined demographic similarity/difference between leaders and followers and level of intercultural sensitivity of leaders as predictors of followers’ ratings of leader–member exchange (LMX) in a U.S. higher education environment. A significant positive relationship was found between leaders’ levels of intercultural sensitivity and followers’ ratings of LMX. Specifically, as leaders’ levels of intercultural sensitivity increased, followers’ rating of LMX also increased. Demographic similarity/difference did not have a predictive relationship with followers’ ratings of LMX.
AdlerP. (1977). Beyond cultural identity: Reflections upon cultural and multicultural man. In BrislinR. W. (Ed.), Cultural learning concepts, application and research (pp. 24-41). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
2.
BasuR. (1991). An empirical examination of LMX and transformational leadership as predictors of innovative behavior (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9201299)
3.
BasuR.GraenS. (1995). Subordinate performance, leader subordinate compatibility, and exchange quality in leader-member dyads: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 77-92.
4.
BennettJ. M.BennettM. J. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In LandisD.BennettJ. M.BennettM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed., pp. 147-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BennettM. J. (1984). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental mode of intercultural sensitivity. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Council on International Exchange, Minneapolis, MN.
6.
BennettM. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 79-95.
7.
BennettM. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In PaigeR. M. (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21-71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
8.
BhawukD. P. S.BrislinR. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 413-436.
9.
BochnerS. (1979). The mediating man and cultural diversity. In BrislinR. (Ed.), Cultural learning: Concepts applications and research (pp. 23-37). Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
10.
BronfenbrennerU.HardingJ.GallweyM. (1958). The measurement of skills in social perception. In McClellandD. C.BaldwinA. L.BronfenbrennerU.StrodtbeckF. L. (Eds.), Talent and society (pp. 29-111). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
11.
ChenG. M. (1997). A review of the concept of intercultural sensitivity. Paper presented at the biennial convention of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association, Honolulu, HI.
12.
ChenG. M.StarostaW. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. In BurlesonB. R. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 19, pp. 353-384). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CrableR. E. (1981). One to another: A guidebook for interpersonal communication. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
14.
DeVitoJ. A. (1980). The interpersonal communication book (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
GerstnerC. R.DayD. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
17.
GraenG. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
18.
GraenG.NovakM. A.SommerkampP. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and job satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
19.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchanges (LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
20.
GreenS. G.AndersonS. E.ShiversS. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 203-214.
21.
GudykunstW. B.HammerM. R. (1983) Basic training design: Approaches to intercultural training. In LandisD.BrislinR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training, Vol. 1: Issues in theory and design (pp. 118-154). New York, NY: Pergamon.
22.
HammerM. R.BennettM. J. (1998). The Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) manual. Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.
23.
HammerM. R.BennettM. J.WisemanR. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421-444.
24.
HartR. P.BurksD. M. (1972). Rhetorical sensitivity and social interaction. Speech Monographs, 39, 75-91.
25.
HartR. P.CarlsonR. E.EadieW. F. (1980). Attitudes toward communication and the assessment of rhetorical sensitivity. Communication Monographs, 47, 1-22.
26.
HeathD. H. (1977). Maturity and competence: A transcultural view. New York, NY: Gardener Press.
27.
HenemanR. L.GreenbergerD. B.AnonyuoC. (1989). Attributes and exchanges: The effects of interpersonal factors on the diagnosis of employee performance. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 466-476.
28.
HofmannD. A.GriffinM. A.GavinM. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to management research. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467-511). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
HooijbergR.DiTomasoN. (1996). Leadership in and of demographically diverse organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 1-19.
30.
HoopesD. S. (1981). Intercultural communication concepts and the psychology of intercultural experience. In PuschM. D. (Ed.), Multicultural education: A cross-cultural training approach (pp. 9-39). Chicago, IL: Intercultural Press.
31.
KellyG. (1963). A theory of personality. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
32.
KinickiA. J.VecchioR. P. (1994). Influences on the quality of supervisor-subordinate relations: The role of time-pressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 75-82.
33.
KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236.
LidenR. C.MaslynJ. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43-72.
36.
LidenR. C.WayneS. J.StilwellD. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.
37.
LuthansF.AvolioB. J.AveyJ. B.NormanS. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541-572.
38.
MinskyB. D. (2002). LMX dyad agreement: Construct definition and the role of supervisor/subordinate similarity and communication in understanding LMX (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University.
39.
MurphyS. E.EnsherE. A. (1999). The effects of leader and subordinate characteristics in the development of leader-member exchange quality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1371-1394.
40.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2001). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
41.
NishiiL.MayerD. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1412-1426.
42.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43.
OrganD. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
44.
PhillipsR. L.BedeianA. G. (1994). Leader-follower exchange quality: The role of personal and interpersonal attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 990-1001.
45.
PilottaJ. J. (1983). The phenomenological approach. In GudykunstW. B. (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory: Current perspectives (pp. 271-282). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46.
ProsserM. (1978). The cultural dialogue. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
47.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
RestubogL. D.BordiaP.TangR. L.KrebsS. A. (2010). Investigating the moderating effects of leaders-member exchange in the psychological contract breach-employee performance relationship: A test of two competing perspective. British Journal of Management, 21, 422-437.
49.
RosenbergH. (1989). U.S.-Soviet interchange: An evaluation of the underlying assumptions of U.S. peace organizations sponsoring contact with Soviet citizens (Master’s thesis). Portland State University, Portland, OR.
50.
ScanduraT. A.GraenG. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428-436.
51.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
VecchioR. P.GobdelB. C. (1984). The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and perspectives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 5-20.
53.
WatzlawickP. (Ed.). (1984). Invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know?New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
54.
WayneS. J.LidenR. C.SparroweR. T. (1994). Developing leader-member exchanges: The influence of gender and ingratiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 697-714.
