This article investigates the respective influence of two different forms of communication on performance in new services development teams, namely, formal team meetings and informal cross-functional communication. Based on the work by Gebert and colleagues, the authors suggest a complementary relationship between these two forms of communication. They posit that team meetings enhance knowledge integration but may challenge knowledge generation. Inversely, they posit that cross-functional communication fosters knowledge generation but hinders knowledge integration. The authors therefore expect that cross-functional communication and team meetings will interact to predict team performance. A study on 55 new services development teams in consulting and financial services confirmed the authors’ hypothesis.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3.
AnandN.GardnerH.MorrisT. (2007). Knowledge based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 406-428.
4.
AnconaD. G.CaldwellD. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
5.
ArmbrüsterT. (2006). The economics and sociology of management consulting. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6.
AsafteiG. (2008). The contribution of product mix versus efficiency and technical change in US banking. Journal of banking & finance, 32(11), 2336-2345.
7.
AsafteiG.KumbhakarS. C. (2008). Regulation and efficiency in transition: the case of Romanian banks. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 33(3), 253-282.
8.
Atuahene-GimaK. (2003). The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter?Academy of Management Journal, 46, 359-373.
9.
AvolioB. J.YammarinoF. J.BassB. M. (1991). Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. Journal of Management, 17, 571-587.
10.
BealD.CohenR.BurkeM.McLendonC. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.
11.
BeckerB.GerhartB. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 779-801.
12.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-interdependence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-382). San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass/Pfeiffer.
13.
BossoneB. (2001). Do banks have a future?: A study on banking and finance as we move into the third millennium. Journal of banking & finance, 25(12), 2239-2276.
14.
BrewerM. B. (1996). Managing diversity: Can we reap the benefits without paying the costs. In JacksonS. E.RudermanR. N. (Eds.), Diversity in workteams: Paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47-68). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
16.
BrodbeckF. C.KerschreiterR.MojzischA.Schulz-HardtS. (2007). Improving group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 459-479.
17.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.
18.
BundersonJ. S.SutcliffeK. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875-893.
19.
CabralesA. L.MedinaC. C.LavadoA. C.CabreraR. V. (2008). Managing functional diversity, risk taking and incentives for teams to achieve radical innovations. R&D Management, 38, 35-50.
20.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
21.
DeDreuC. K. W.WeingartL. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
22.
DoughertyD. (2006). Organizing for innovation in the 21st century. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 598-617). London, England: Sage.
23.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.RustM. C.NierJ. A.BankerB. S.WardC. M.. . . HouletteM. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388-402.
24.
GebertD.BoernerS.KearneyE. (2006). Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: The dynamics of the dilemmatic structure and consequences for the management of diversity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 431-458.
25.
GebertD.BoernerS.KearneyE. (2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?Organization Science, 21, 593-608.
26.
GooderhamP.MinbeavaD. B.PedersenT. (2011). Governance mechanisms for the promotion of social capital for knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 123-150.
27.
GruenfeldD. H.FanE. T. (1999). What newcomers see and what oldtimers say: Discontinuities in knowledge exchange. In ThompsonL. L.LevineJ. M.MessickD. M. (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 245-266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
HarrisonD. A.PriceK. H.BellM. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
29.
HüttermannH.BoernerS. (2011). Fostering innovation in functionally diverse teams: The two faces of transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 833-854.
30.
JacksonS. E.JoshiA. (2010). Workteam diversity. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 651-686). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
JacksonS. E.JoshiA.ErhardtN. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
32.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
33.
JehnK. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefit and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
34.
JehnK. E.NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
35.
KearneyE.GebertD. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 77-89.
36.
KearneyE.GebertD.VoelpelS. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581-598.
37.
KellerR. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547-555.
38.
KrafftJ.RavixJ. L. (2008). Corporate governance and the governance of knowledge: Rethinking the relationship on terms of corporate coherence. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1&2), 79-95.
39.
LangfredC. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385-399.
40.
LevinD. Z.CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477-1490.
41.
LewisM. W.WelshM. A.DehlerG. E.GreenS. G. (2002). Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 546-564.
42.
LovelaceK.ShapiroD.WeingartL. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779-793.
43.
MathieuJ. E.GoodwinG. F.HeffnerT. S.SalasE.Cannon-BowersA. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
44.
McGrathR. G.MacmillanI. C.VenkataramanS. (1995). Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 251-275.
45.
MenorL. J. (2000). An empirical investigation of new service development competence and performance (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
46.
MenorL. J.TatikondaM. V.SampsonS. E. (2002). New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 135-157.
47.
MontoyaM. M.MasseyA. P.HungY. T. C.CrispC. B. (2009). Can You Hear Me Now? Communication in Virtual Product Development Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 139-155.
48.
NijssenE. J.HillebrandB.VermeulenP. A. M.KempR. G. M. (2006). Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3), 241-251.
49.
PearceC. L.EnsleyM. D. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 259-278.
50.
PetersL. D.FletcherK. P. (2004). Communication strategies and marketing performance: An application of the Mohr and Nevin framework to intra-organisational cross-functional teams. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(7-8), 741-770.
51.
PelledL. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organizational Science, 7, 615-631.
52.
PelledL. H.EisenhardtK. M.XinK. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
53.
PintoM. B.PintoJ. K.PrescottJ. E. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science, 39, 1281-1297.
54.
ReagansR.ZuckermanE. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502-517.
55.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375 409.
56.
SheremataW. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25, 398-408.
57.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 420-428.
58.
SpohrerJ.MaglioP. P.BaileyJ.GruhlD. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1), 7-77.
59.
StasserG.TitusW. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
60.
StewartG. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-54.
61.
TaggarS. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315-330.
62.
Van der VegtG. S.BundersonJ. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532-548.
63.
Van der VegtG. S.BundersonJ.OosterhofA. (2006). Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 877-893.
64.
van KnippenbergD.De DreuC. K. W.HomanA. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
65.
van KnippenbergD.SchippersM. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541.
66.
WilliamsK. Y.O’ReillyC. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in organizational behavior, 20(20), 77-140.
