Despite a disproportionate level of practitioner interest in the role of top management teams (TMTs), TMT power dynamics and its effect on turnaround performance has been one of the most understudied areas in the turnaround literature. Drawing from the strategic decision-making literature, this study empirically examined the relationship between CEO power and corporate turnaround performance under conditions of environmental stability/dynamism. Our analysis of 98 U.S. manufacturing firms that experienced serious performance decline and turnaround during 1990-2000 indicated a varying effect of CEO power on the extent of corporate turnaround performance in stable and dynamic environments.
Aiken, L., & West, S. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
Altman, E. ( 1983). Corporate financial distress: A complete guide to predicting and avoiding bankruptcy. New York, NY: Wiley.
3.
Ancona, D. ( 1990). Top management teams: Preparing for the revolution. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 99-128). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Andrews, K. ( 1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Home-wood, IL: Irwin.
5.
Arogyaswamy, K., Barker, V., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1995). Firm turnarounds: An integrative two-stage model. Journal of Management Studies , 32, 493-525.
6.
Barker, V. ( 1992). Corporate turnarounds as strategic reorientations: A field study of turnaround attempts from firm-based decline (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign .
7.
Barker, V., & Barr, P. ( 2002). Linking top manager attributions to strategic reorientation in declining firms attempting turnarounds. Journal of Business Research, 55, 963-997.
8.
Barker, V., & Duhaime, I. ( 1997). Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 13-38.
9.
Barker, V., & Mone, M. ( 1994). Retrenchment: Cause of turnaround or consequence of decline ? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 395-405.
10.
Barker, V., & Mone, M. ( 1998). The mechanistic structure shift and strategic reorientation in declining firms attempting turnarounds. Human Relations , 51, 1227-1258.
11.
Barker, V., & Patterson, P. ( 1996). Top management team tenure and top manager causal attributions at declining firms attempting turnarounds. Group & Organization Management, 21, 304-336.
12.
Barker, V., Patterson, P., & Mueller, G. ( 2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 235-269.
13.
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
14.
Bibeault, D. ( 1982). Corporate turnaround: How managers turn losers into winners . New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Bigley, G., & Wiersema, M. ( 2002). New CEOs and corporate strategic refocusing: How experience as heir apparent influences the use of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 707-727.
16.
Bourgeois, L., & Eisenhardt, K. (1988). Strategic decision process in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34, 816-835.
17.
Boyd, B. ( 1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model . Strategic Management Journal, 16, 301-312.
18.
Cameron, K., Kim, M., & Whetten, D. ( 1987). Organizational effects of decline and turbulence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 222-240.
19.
Cameron, K., Sutton, R., & Whetten, D. ( 1988). Issues in organizational decline. In K. Cameron, R. Sutton, & D. Whetten (Eds.), Readings in organizational decline: Frameworks, research and prescriptions (pp. 3-19). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
20.
Carpenter, M., & Fredrickson, J. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 533-545.
21.
Castrogiovanni, G. ( 2002). Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time? Journal of Management, 28, 129-150.
22.
Chesley, J., & Huff, A. ( 1998). Anticipating strategic turnaround: The systems and structures that enable/constrain change. In D. Ketchen (Ed.), Advances in applied business strategy: Vol. 5. Turnaround research: Past accomplishments and future challenges (pp. 177-204). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
Clapham, S., Schwenk, C., & Caldwell, C. ( 2005). CEO perceptions and corporate turnaround. Journal of Change Management, 5, 407-428.
24.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. ( 1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Combs, J., Ketchen, D., Perryman, A., & Donahue, M. ( 2007). The moderating effect of CEO power on the board composition-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1299-1323.
26.
Daft, R., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. ( 1988). Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 123-140.
27.
Daily, C., & Dalton, D. ( 1995). CEO and director turnover in failing firms: An illusion of change? Strategic Management Journal, 16, 393-400.
28.
Daily, C., & Johnson, J. ( 1997). Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23, 97-117.
29.
Dess, G., & Beard, D. ( 1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73.
30.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. ( 1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49-64.
31.
Dumaine, B. ( 1990, July 16). The new turnaround champs. Fortune, 122, 36-44.
32.
Eisenhardt, K. ( 1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
33.
Eisenhardt, K., & Bourgeois, L.J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision-making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737-770.
34.
Eisenhardt, K., & Zbaracki, M. ( 1992). Strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17-37.
35.
Emerson, R. ( 1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
36.
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. ( 1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 301-325.
37.
Finkelstein, S. ( 1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 505-538.
38.
Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1079-1108.
39.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. ( 1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.
40.
Flynn, F., & Staw, B. ( 2004). Lend me your wallets: The effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 309-330.
41.
Galbraith, J. ( 1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42.
Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. ( 1997). Rational decision-making and firm performance: The moderating role of environment. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 583-591.
43.
Greve, H., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007). Power and glory: Concentrated power in top management teams. Organization Studies, 28, 1197-1221.
44.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. ( 2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
45.
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844-863.
46.
Hambrick, D. ( 1981). Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 253-275.
47.
Hambrick, D., Cho, T., & Chen, M. ( 1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly , 41, 659-684.
48.
Hambrick, D., & D’Aveni, R. (1988). Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 1-23.
49.
Hambrick, D., & D’Aveni, R. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38, 1445-1466.
50.
Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. ( 1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
51.
Hambrick, D., & Schecter, S. ( 1983). Turnaround strategies for mature industrial-product business units. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 231-248.
52.
Hickson, D., Hinings, C., Lee, C., Schneck, R., & Pennings, J. ( 1971). A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
53.
Hofer, C. ( 1980). Turnaround strategies. Journal of Business Strategy, 1, 19-31.
54.
Hoskisson, R., Hitt, M., Johnson, R., & Moesel, D. ( 1993). Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 215-235.
55.
Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. ( 1967). Organization and environment. Burr Ridge, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
56.
Levin, D. ( 1995). Behind the wheel at Chrysler: the Iacocca legacy. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
57.
Lohrke, F., & Bedeian, A. ( 1998). Managerial responses to declining performance: Turnaround investment strategies and critical contingencies. In D. Ketchen (Ed.), Advances in applied business strategy : Vol. 5. Turnaround research: Past accomplishments and future challenges (pp. 3-20). Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
58.
Lohrke, F., Bedeian, A., & Palmer, T. ( 2004). The role of top management teams in formulating and implementing turnaround strategies: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(2), 63-90.
59.
Lorange, P., & Murphy, D. ( 1984). Systematic, behavioral and political considerations in strategic control: Some empirical results. Journal of Business Strategy, 4(4), 27-35.
60.
Mallette, P., & Fowler, K. ( 1992). Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of "poison pills." Academy of Management Journal , 35, 1010-1035.
61.
McArthur, A., & Nystrom, P. ( 1991). Environmental dynamism, complexity and munificence as moderators of strategy-performance relationships. Journal of Business Research, 23, 349-361.
62.
McDonald, L., & Robinson, P. ( 2009). A colossal failure of common sense: The inside story of the collapse of Lehman Brothers. New York, NY: Crown.
63.
Meindl, J., & Ehrlich, S. ( 1987). The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 91-109.
64.
Meindl, J., Ehrlich, S., & Dukerich, J. ( 1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78-102.
65.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. ( 1977). Strategy-making in context: Ten empirical archetypes . Journal of Management Studies, 14, 259-280.
66.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. ( 1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-235.
67.
Morris, B. ( 2007). Dynamic duo: Anne Mulcahy and Ursula Burns saved Xerox in a historic turnaround. Fortune, 156, 50-59.
68.
Morrow, J., Johnson, R., & Busenitz, L. ( 2004). The effects of cost and asset retrenchment on firm performance: The overlooked role of a firm’s competitive environment. Journal of Management, 30, 189-208.
69.
Mueller, G., & Barker, V. ( 1997). Upper echelons and board characteristics of turnaround and nonturnaround declining firms. Journal of Business Research , 39, 119-134.
70.
Nickerson, R. ( 1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises . Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
71.
Nystrom, P., & Starbuck, W. ( 1984). To avoid organizational crises: Unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 53-65.
72.
O’Neill, H. ( 1986). An analysis of the turnaround strategy in commercial banking. Journal of Management Studies, 23, 165-188.
73.
Pearce, J., & Robbins, K. ( 1993). Toward improved theory and research on business turnaround . Journal of Management, 19, 613-636.
74.
Pettigrew, A. ( 1973). The politics of organizational decision-making. London, England: Tavistock.
75.
Pfeffer, J. ( 1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
76.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. ( 1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
77.
Pollock, T., Fischer, H., & Wade, J. ( 2002). The role of power and politics in the repricing of executive options. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1172-1182.
78.
Porter, M. ( 1980). Competitive strategy. New York, NY : The Free Press.
79.
Pressman, A. ( 2007, February 1). Kodak’s turnaround keeps developing . Business Week, p. 16.
80.
Rasheed, A., & Prescott, J. ( 1992). Towards an objective classification scheme for organizational task environments. British Journal of Management, 3, 197-206.
81.
Rechner, P., & Dalton, D. ( 1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 155-160.
82.
Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. ( 1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision-making: The case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly , 19, 453-473.
83.
Slatter, S., Lovett, D., & Barlow, L. ( 2006). Leading corporate turnaround: How leaders fix troubled companies. West Sus-sex, England: Wiley.
84.
Smith, A., Houghton, S., Hood, J.N., & Ryman, J. ( 2006). Power relationships among top managers: Does top management team power distribution matter for organizational performance? Journal of Business Research, 59, 622-629.
85.
Staw, B., Sandelands, L., & Dutton, J. ( 1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
86.
Taylor, A. ( 2009, June 10). More bumps ahead for Chrysler. Fortune. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/10/autos/chrysler_fiat_bumps_road.fortune/index.htm
87.
Tosi, H., Aldag, R., & Storey, R. ( 1973). On the measurement of the environment: An assessment of the Lawrence and Lorsch environmental uncertainty scale. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 27-36.
88.
Tushman, M., & Romanelli, E. ( 1985). Organization evolution: A Metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 171-222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
89.
Zahra, S., & Pearce, J. ( 1989). Board of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15, 291-334.
90.
Zammuto, R., & Cameron, K. ( 1985). Environmental decline and organizational response. In L. L. Cummings, & B. L. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 223-262). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
