Theoretical concepts from the organizational behavior literature, including commitment, are rarely used to help explain university student behavior. The benefits of doing so might include the development of a synthesis of knowledge about the behavior of students in an organizational setting. Such a synthesis is important because it will help extend organizational commitment literature to student samples and will help explain student behavior as a result of their commitment. As such, the purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to test theoretical propositions advanced by Meyer and Herscovitch concerning the interactive effects of affective, normative, and continuance commitment on students’ focal and discretionary behaviors and (b) to provide an exploratory examination of the notion of a commitment profile “context effect” for normative commitment for students in a university setting. Study measures were gathered from a sample of 287 undergraduate business students. Results showed support for interactive effects of the three components of commitment for both focal and discretionary behavior. Results also showed support for commitment profile differences and for the existence of a normative commitment context effect.
Adams, J.M., & Jones, W.H. ( 1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1177-1196.
2.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. ( 1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
4.
Allen, R.E. ( 2007). Predictors of organizational commitment in college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University , Davie, FL.
5.
Allen, T.D., & Rush, M.C. ( 1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.
6.
Armstrong, M.J. ( 2003). Students as clients: A professional services model for business education. Academy of Management Learning and Education , 2, 371-374.
7.
Bansal, H.S., Irving, P.G., & Taylor, S.F. ( 2004). A three-component model of customer commitment to service providers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 234-250.
8.
Becker, H.S. ( 1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-42.
9.
Bergeron, D.M. ( 2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32, 1078-1095.
10.
Bettencourt, L.A., Gwinner, K.P., & Meuter, M.L. ( 2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 29-41.
11.
Burke, R.J., & Deszca, E. ( 1982). Preferred organizational climates of type A individuals . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 50-59.
12.
Cabrera, A.F., Nora, A., & Castaneda, M.B. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 33, 571-593.
13.
Cabrera, A.F., Nora, A., & Castaneda, M.B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 123-139.
14.
Coleman, V.I., & Borman, W.C. ( 2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44.
15.
Dunham, R.B., Grube, J.A., & Castaneda, M.B. (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 370-380.
16.
Ferris, W.P. ( 2002). Students as junior partners, professors as senior partners, the B-school as the firm: A new model for collegiate business education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 185-193.
17.
Ferris, W.P. ( 2003). Why the partnership model’s usefulness far exceeds that of the client model: Reply to Armstrong. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 375-377.
18.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
Franz, R.S. ( 1998). Whatever you do, don’t treat your students like customers!Journal of Management Education, 22, 63-69.
20.
Gellatly, I.R., Meyer, J.P., & Luchak, A.A. ( 2006). Combined effects of three commitment components on focal and discretionary behaviors: A test of Meyer and Herscovitch’s propositions . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 331-345.
21.
Hackett, R.D., Bycio, P., & Hausdorf, P.A. (1994). Further assessments of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment . Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 15-23.
22.
Handelsman, M.M., Briggs, W.L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. ( 2005). A measure of college student course engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 184-191.
23.
Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J.P. ( 2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 474-487.
24.
Higgins, E.T. ( 1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Hoffman, B.J., Blair, C.A., Meriac, J.P., & Woehr, D.J. ( 2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555-566.
26.
Hoffman, K.D., & Kretovics, M.A. (2004). Students as partial employees: A metaphor for the student-institution interaction. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 103-120.
27.
Human Sciences Research Council. (2007). Why students leave: The problem of high university drop-out rates (HSRC Review Vol. 5, No. 3). Pretoria, South Africa: Author.
28.
Jaros, S.J. ( 1997). An assessment of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 319-337.
29.
Kuhn, T.S. ( 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Lambert, M., Zeman, K., Allen, M., & Bussière, P. (2001). Who pursues postsecondary education, who leaves and why: Results from the Youth in Transition Survey (81-595-MIE2004026). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
31.
Lindell, M.K., & Whitney, D.J. ( 2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114-121.
32.
Lomas, L. ( 2007). Are students customers? Perceptions of academic staff . Quality in Higher Education, 13, 31-44.
33.
Luchak, A.A., & Gellatly, I.R. (2007). A comparison of linear and nonlinear relations between organizational commitment and work outcomes . Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 786-793.
34.
Luthans, F., Norman, S.M., Avolio, B., & Avey, J.B. ( 2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate-employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 219-238.
35.
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. ( 1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J., & Smith, C.A. ( 1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of the three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
37.
Meyer, J.P., Becker, T.E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991-1007.
38.
Meyer, J.P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299-326.
39.
Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of interrelations and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
40.
Mowday, R.Y., Steers, R., & Porter, L.W. ( 1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
41.
Organ, D.W. ( 1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath .
42.
Organ, D.W. ( 1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 43-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Organ, D.W., & Konovsky, M. ( 1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157-164.
45.
Podsakoff, P.M., & MacKenzie, S.B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 351-363.
46.
Popper, K.R. ( 1965). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper.
47.
Powell, D.M., & Meyer, J.P. ( 2004). Becker’s side-bet theory revisited: A test of the theory within the context of Meyer and Allen’s three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 65, 157-177.
48.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. ( 2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist , 55, 68-78.
49.
Schmidt, S. ( 2006). Universities adopting different strategies to cut high dropout rates. Vancouver Sun. October 31, 2006; URL: http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=8a112484-aea5-4e8a-be69-c8986a34837d&k=95908; Download date: June 2, 2008; Most recent download date: February 19, 2010
50.
Schuller, T., Preston, J., Hammond, C., Brassett-Grundy, A., & Bynner, J. ( 2004). The benefits of learning: The impact of education on health, family life, and social capital. London: Routledge-Falmer.
51.
Sheldon, K.M., & Elliot, A.J. ( 1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546-557.
52.
Sheldon, K.M., & Elliot, A.J. ( 1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546-557.
53.
Sinclair, R.R., Tucker, J.S., Cullen, J.C., & Wright, C. ( 2005). Performance differences among four organizational commitment profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1280-1287.
54.
Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. ( 1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology , 82, 22-32.
55.
Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W., & Near, J.P. ( 1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents . Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
56.
Tinto, V. ( 1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
57.
Tsui, A.S., Pearce, J.L., Porter, L.W., &Tripoli, A.M. ( 1997). Alternative approaches to employee-organization relationships: Does investment in employees pay off? Academyof-Management Journal, 40, 1089-1121.
58.
Van Dyne, L., Graham, J.W., & Dienesch, R.M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765-802.
59.
Wasti, S.A. ( 2005). Commitment profiles: Combinations of organizational forms and job outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 290-308.
60.
Whetton, D.A. ( 1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-495.
61.
Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors . Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
62.
Wlodkowski, R.J., Mauldin, J., & Campbell, S. ( 2002). Early exit: Understanding adult attrition in accelerated and traditional postsecondary programs. Synopsis: Higher education research highlights. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education.
