Despite the increased popularity of person-centered analyses, no comprehensive approach exists to guide the systematic investigation of the similarity (or generalizability) of latent profiles, their predictors, and their outcomes across subgroups of participants or time points. We propose a six-step process to assess configural (number of profiles), structural (within-profile means), dispersion (within-profile variability), distributional (size of the profiles), predictive (relations between predictors and profile membership), and explanatory (relations between profile membership and outcomes) similarity. We then apply this approach to data on organizational commitment mindsets collected in North America (n = 492) and France (n = 476). This approach provides a rigorous method to systematically and quantitatively assess the extent to which a latent profile solution generalizes across diverse samples, such as in the cross-national comparison in our illustrative example, or the extent to which interventions or naturalistic changes may impact the nature of a latent profile solution. This approach also helps to identify the nature of any differences that might be present, thus providing richer interpretations of observed differences and ideas for future research.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 1–13.
2.
AymanR.KorabikK. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65, 157–170.
3.
BauerD. J.CurranP. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models over-extraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363.
4.
BauerD. J.CurranP. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3–29.
5.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
6.
BorsboomD.MellenberghG. J.van HeerdenJ. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–218.
7.
BrislinR. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW. L.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
CarterN. T.DalalD. K.LakeC. J.LinB. C.ZickarM. J. (2011). Using mixed-model item response theory to analyze organizational survey responses: An illustration using the Job Descriptive Index. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 116–146.
9.
ChenF.BollenK. A.PaxtonP.CurranP. J.KirbyJ. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural models: Causes, consequences, strategies. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 468–508.
10.
CombsJ.LiuY.HallA.KetchenD.2006. How much do high-performance practices matter? A meta-analysis of effects on performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 501–528.
11.
CudeckR.HenlyS. J. (2003). A realistic perspective on pattern representation in growth data: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 378–383.
12.
DumenciL. (2011). The psychometric latent agreement model (PLAM) for discrete latent variables measured by multiple items. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 91–115.
13.
EidM.LangeheineR.DienerE.2003. Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 195–210.
GelfandM. J.NishiiL. H.RaverJ. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1225–1244.
16.
HensonJ. M.ReiseS. P.KimK. H. (2007). Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 202–226.
17.
HippJ. R.BauerD. J. (2006). Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 11, 36–53.
18.
JiangK.LepakD. P.HuJ.BaerJ. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1264–1294.
19.
KamC.MorinA. J. S.MeyerJ. P.TopolnytskyL. (2016). Are commitment profiles stable and predictable? A latent transition analysis. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0149206313503010
20.
KankarašM.MoorsG.VermuntJ.K. (2011). Testing for measurement invariance with latent class analysis. In DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ. (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 359–384). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
KankarašM.VermuntJ. K.MoorsG. (2011). Measurement equivalence of ordinal items: A comparison of factor analytic, item response theory, and latent class approaches. Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 279–310.
22.
KehoeR. R.WrightP. M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 39, 366–391.
23.
LanzaS. T.TanX.BrayB. C. (2013). Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: A flexible model-based approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 1–26.
24.
LawrenceB. S.ZyphurM. J. (2011). Identifying organizational faultlines with latent class cluster analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 32–57.
LiL.HserY.-I. (2011). On inclusion of covariates for class enumeration of growth mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 266–302.
27.
LoY.MendellN.RubinD. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.
28.
LubkeG. H.MuthénB. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.
29.
LubkeG.MuthénB. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, criterion measure effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 26–47.
30.
LubkeG.NealeM. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 499–532.
31.
LubkeG.NealeM. (2008). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors with categorical outcomes: Class invariance of parameters of factor mixture models?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 592–620.
32.
LukaszewskiK. M.StoneD. L. (2012). Theory and research on social issues in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 324–329.
33.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu & Bentler’s (1999). Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
34.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.TrautweinU.MorinA. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 191–225.
35.
McDonaldR. P. (1970). Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 1–21.
36.
McLachlanG.PeelD. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
37.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
38.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J.SmithC. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.
39.
MeyerJ. P.HerscovitchL. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward the general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299–326.
40.
MeyerJ. P.MorinA. J. S.VandenbergheC. (2015). Dual commitment to organization and supervisor: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 56–72.
41.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyL. J.VandenbergR. M. (2013). A person-centered approach to the study of commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 190–202.
42.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
43.
MobleyW. H.GriffethR.HandH.MeglinoB. (1979) A review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.
44.
MorinA. J. S.MaïanoC.NagengastB.MarshH. W.MorizotJ.JanoszM. (2011). General growth mixture analysis of adolescents’ developmental trajectories of anxiety: The impact of untested invariance assumptions on interpretations. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 613–648.
45.
MorinA. J. S.MarshH. W. (2015). Disentangling shape from level effects in person-centered analyses: An illustration based on university teacher multidimensional profiles of effectiveness. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 33–59.
46.
MorinA. J. S.MorizotJ.BoudriasJ.-S.MadoreI. (2011). A multifoci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 58–90.
47.
MorinA. J. S.ScalasL. F.MarshH. W. (2015). Tracking the elusive actual-ideal discrepancy model within latent subpopulations. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 65–72.
48.
MuthénB. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81–117.
49.
MuthénB. O. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 369–377.
50.
MuthénB. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling. In KaplanD. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.
53.
Nylund-GibsonK.GrimmR.QuirkM.FurlongM. (2014). A latent transition mixture model using the three-step specification. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 439–454.
54.
OrganD. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
55.
PetrasH.MasynK. (2010). General growth mixture analysis with antecedents and consequences of change. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 69–100). New York, NY: Springer.
56.
PeughJ.FanX. (2013). Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using latent profile analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 616–639.
57.
QureshiI.FangY. (2011). Socialization in open source software projects: A growth mixture modeling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 208–238.
58.
RaykovT. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 223–232.
59.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2004). Using the delta method for approximate interval estimation of parameter functions in SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 621–637.
60.
RiordanC. M.VandenbergR. J. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner. Journal of Management, 20, 643–671.
61.
SaksA. M.UggerslevK. L.FassinaN. E. (2007). Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and tests of a model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 413–446.
62.
SchafferB. S.RiordanC. M.2003. A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: Best-practices. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 169–215.
63.
SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P.MaslachC.JacksonS. E. (1996). MBI-General Survey. In MaslachD. C.JacksonS. F.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
64.
SijtsmaK. (2009) On the use, misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74,107–120.
65.
SkrondalA.LaakeP. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66, 563–576.
66.
SpectorP. E.LiuC.SanchezJ.I. (2015). Methodological and substantive issues in conducting multinational and cross cultural-research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 101–131.
67.
SteinleyD.McDonaldR.P. (2007). Examining factor scores distributions to determine the nature of latent spaces. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 133–156.
68.
TayL.DienerE.DrasgowF.VermuntJ.K. (2011). Multilevel mixed-measurement IRT analysis: An explication and application to self-reported emotions across the world. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 177–207.
69.
TayL.NewmanD. A.VermuntJ. K. (2011). Using mixed-measurement item response theory with covariates (MM-IRT-C) to ascertain observed and unobserved measurement equivalence. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 147–176.
70.
TeinJ.-Y.CoxeS.ChamH. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 640–657.
71.
TofighiD.EndersC. K. (2007). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In HancockG. R.SamuelsenK. M. (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317–341). Charlotte, NC: Information Age
72.
TofighiD.EndersC. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In HancockG. R.SamuelsenK. M. (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317–341). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
73.
TolvanenA. (2007). Latent growth mixture modeling: A simulation study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Mathematics, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
UebersaxJ. S. (1999). Probit latent class analysis with dichotomous or ordered category measures: Conditional independence/dependence models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 283–297.
76.
Van MaanenJ.ScheinE. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.
78.
VermuntJ. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469.
79.
WangM.HangesP. J. (2011). Latent class procedures: Applications to organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 24–31.
80.
WilliamsL. J.AndersonS. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
