Learning to lead online is imperative for the future of leadership. Whether they like it or not, even if they prefer face-to-face interactions, leaders of the future must be able to develop a sense of closeness with others, whether they be down the hall or around the world. In this study, face-to-face residential workshops were matched with online sessions over an 18-month period. Data from 75 participants, ranging from 18-year-olds to senior corporate executives, suggest that levels of online communication are positively correlated to perceptions of closeness among peers and that the relationship between peer closeness and leadership outcomes is moderated by online activity.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S., & Dodge G.E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 615-669.
3.
Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S., Dum Dum, R., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2000). Virtual teams: Implications for e-leadership and team development. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations: Person perception and interpersonal judgement in I/O Psychology (pp. 337-359). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J.R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same construct. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175-184.
6.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Cascio, W.F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 81-90.
8.
Cascio, W.F., & Shurygailo, S. (2003). E-leadership and virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 362-376.
9.
Cummings, J.N. (2008). Leading groups from a distance: How to mitigate consequences of geographic dispersion. In S. Weisband (Ed.), Leadership at a distance (pp. 33-50). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Gibson, C.B., & Manuel, J.A. (2003). Building trust: Effective multicultural communication processes in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 59-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Kahai, S., Sosik, J.J., & Avolio, B.J. (2000). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards in an electronic meeting system environment. Binghamton, NY: Center for Leadership Studies.
12.
Kilgore, W.D.S. (1999). The visual analogue mood scale: Can a single-item scale accurately classify depressive mood state? Psychological Reports, 85, 1238-1243.
13.
Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., & Gibson, C.B. (2004). The impact of empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating effect of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175-192.
14.
Kolb, D.G. (2008). Exploring the connectivity metaphor: Attributes, dimensions and duality. Organization Studies, 29(1), 127-144.
15.
Kolb, D.G., Collins, P.D., & Lind, E.A. (2008). Requisite connectivity: Finding flow in a not-so-flat world. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 181-189.
16.
Nagy, M.S. (2002). Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 77-86.
17.
Oshagbemi, T. (1999). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single versus multiple-item measures? Journal of Managerial Psychology , 14, 388-403.
18.
Popper, M., Amit, K., Gal, R., Mishkal-Sinai, M., & Lisak, A. (2004). The capacity to lead: Major psychological differences between leaders and nonleaders. Military Psychology, 16(4), 245-263.
19.
Riggio, R. E., Chaleff, I., & Lipman-Blumen, J. (Eds.). (2008). The art of followership: How great followers create great leaders and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Robins, R.W., Hendin, H.M., & Trzesniewski, K.H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151-161.
Silbergh, D., & Lennon, K. (2006). Developing leadership skills: Online versus face-to-face . Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(7), 498-511.
23.
Spector, P.E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232.
24.
Straus, S.G. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in cumputer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27(1), 115-142.
25.
Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J., & Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty . Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134-143.
26.
Wanous, J.P., & Hudy, M.J. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension . Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361-375.
27.
Wegge, J., Schmidt, K., Parkes, C., & van Dick, R. (2007). "Taking a sickie": Job satisfaction and job involvement as interactive predictors of absenteeism in a public organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 77-89.
28.
Weisband, S. (Ed.). (2008). Leadership at a distance. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
