Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background. Gait is influenced by higher order cognitive and cortical control mechanisms. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been used to examine frontal activation during walking in healthy older adults, reporting increased oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) levels during dual task walking (DT), compared with usual walking. Objective. To investigate the role of the frontal lobe during DT and obstacle negotiation, in healthy older adults and patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. Thirty-eight healthy older adults (mean age 70.4 ± 0.9 years) and 68 patients with PD (mean age 71.7 ± 1.1 years,) performed 3 walking tasks: (a) usual walking, (b) DT walking, and (c) obstacles negotiation, with fNIRS and accelerometers. Linear-mix models were used to detect changes between groups and within tasks. Results. Patients with PD had higher activation during usual walking (P < .030). During DT, HbO2 increased only in healthy older adults (P < .001). During obstacle negotiation, HbO2 increased in patients with PD (P = .001) and tended to increase in healthy older adults (P = .053). Higher DT and obstacle cost (P < .003) and worse cognitive performance were observed in patients with PD (P = .001). Conclusions. A different pattern of frontal activation during walking was observed between groups. The higher activation during usual walking in patients with PD suggests that the prefrontal cortex plays an important role already during simple walking. However, higher activation relative to baseline during obstacle negotiation and not during DT in the patients with PD demonstrates that prefrontal activation depends on the nature of the task. These findings may have important implications for rehabilitation of gait in patients with PD.

Keywords

frontal lobe gait Parkinson’s disease obstacle negotiation dual tasking

Introduction

The ability to safely ambulate in everyday environments is compromised in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). This leads to an increased risk of falls, disability, and reduced independence. Safe ambulation is affected by the complexity of task and the person’s abilities.^1-3 For example, walking in complex environments involves avoidance of static and dynamic obstacles. This requires the utilization of motor resources and cognitive resources such as divided attention and visual scanning.^4-7

The ability to walk while carrying out another task, that is, dual task (DT) walking, relies on executive function; a set of cognitive skills that are needed for planning, monitoring and executing a sequence of goal-directed complex actions.⁸ DT represents a cognitive challenge since it demands the allocation of attentional resources to concomitant tasks.^9-11 Deficits in executive function have been reported in patients with PD^12-15 and have been linked to difficulties in walking while dual tasking.^16,17 In patients with PD, the negative effects of a DT on gait properties such as gait speed and stride-to-stride variability and on the cognitive task are larger than that seen in age-matched controls.^18-21

Obstacle crossing is a daily activity that involves tasks such as going up a curb or stepping over a crack in the ground. Motor planning, attention to relevant stimuli, and visual-spatial abilities are essential to successfully negotiate obstacles.^4,22,23 Attention and visual-spatial deficits are common in patients with PD and manifest as difficulty to negotiate obstacles and diverse terrains. This may explain why patients with PD approach and step over obstacles more slowly and with smaller and wider steps than healthy older adults.^4,7,24

The neural control of DT walking and obstacle negotiation is mediated by various regions in the brain, among them the frontal lobe. The frontal cortex, and specifically the prefrontal cortex and its related circuits, are involved in dual tasking and have been implicated in planning, organization, execution, and adjustment to the environment of walking.^25,26 Recently, several studies used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine frontal lobe activity during walking and reported increase oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) levels during walking while DT, compared to usual walking in healthy young and older adults.^27-29 These findings provide direct evidence that DT walking is associated with frontal activation. Although deficits in executive function are common among patients with PD,^12,30,31 accumulating evidence suggests that patients utilize the frontal lobe, mainly regions associated with cognitive resources, to compensate for striatal impairments.^32-34

To date, however, all studies used DT paradigms that involved the performance of a cognitive task during walking. Changes in frontal activation during obstacle negotiating have not been examined. In addition, most of the fNIRS studies that investigated DT walking included healthy young and older adults. Cognitive compensation in patients with PD^32-34 suggest higher activation of the frontal lobe during different walking conditions, however, direct association between frontal activation and walking in patients with PD are lacking. Therefore, the aims of the present study were (a) to examine changes in frontal activation during obstacle negotiation and DT walking, as compared with usual walking in healthy older adults; (b) to investigate changes in frontal activation during usual, DT, and obstacle negotiation walking in patients with PD; and (c) to define the differences in frontal activation during the walking conditions between healthy older adults and patients with PD. We hypothesized that (a) healthy older adults will have higher frontal activation during DT and obstacle negotiation walking, as compared with usual walking; (b) patients with PD will show higher frontal activation during DT and obstacle negotiation walking, as compared with usual walking; and (c) patients with PD will show higher frontal activation in all walking conditions, as compared with healthy older adults.

Methods

Participants

Thirty-eight healthy older adults (20 men and 18 women) and 68 patients with PD (46 men and 22 women) participated in this study. General inclusion criteria were (a) 60-90 years old, (b) able to walk at least 5 minutes unassisted, and (c) stable medications for the past month. Patients with PD were included if they were also (a) diagnosed with idiopathic PD, as defined by the UK Brain Bank criteria; (b) in Hoehn and Yahr stage II-III; and (c) taking anti-Parkinsonian medication. Participants were excluded if they had psychiatric comorbidity (eg, major depressive disorder as determined by DSM-IV criteria), clinical diagnosis of dementia or other clinically significant cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score <24), a history of clinical stroke, clinically significant traumatic brain injury or other neurological disorder that could affect their performance (other than PD), any orthopedic problems that may affect their gait or had unstable medical condition, including cardiovascular instability.³⁴ Recruitment was performed via reaching out to outpatient and related clinics of the geriatric medicine and neurology departments of Tel Aviv Medical Center and Radboud University Medical Center (Nijmegen, the Netherlands). The study was approved by local ethical committees and was performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave their written informed consent prior to participation.

Procedures

The protocol included 2 parts: (a) cognitive and motor examination and (b) assessment of gait and frontal activation. All tests were performed in the “ON” state, approximately 1 hour after taking medications, for the PD patients. Participant characteristics and general physical and cognitive performance measures were obtained. The Mini-Mental State Examination was used to assess global cognitive function³⁵ and a computerized neuropsychological test battery was used to generate index scores of executive function, attention and visual spatial processing (Mindstreams, NeuroTrax Corp., Israel).³⁶ Mobility tests included the four square step test (FSST) to assess balance and mobility³⁷ and the 2-minute walking test (2MWT) for endurance.^38,39 The computerized test battery, FSST and the 2MWT were not available for the healthy older adults from the Radboud University Medical Center (n = 18). The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) was assessed to determine disease severity in patients with PD.⁴⁰

Gait and frontal activation were assessed during 3 walking tasks: (a) usual walking, (b) walking while serially subtracting 3 seconds from a given 3-digit number (DT), and (c) walking while negotiating obstacles at the size of 30 cm width × 20 cm depth × 10 cm height. Each task was performed 5 times, in the order mentioned above. Each of these trials started with 20 seconds of standing quietly, with the instruction to refrain from talking and moving the head. After these 20 seconds, the instruction “start” or “start with [number]” (for serial subtraction) was given. Participants walked back and forth for 30 seconds in a 30-m walkway, afterward they were instructed to stop and stand quietly for another 20 seconds. Rest periods were given between trials based on the participant’s needs. Before starting each trial, the participant stood for at least 1 minute to minimize blood pressure fluctuations after standing up.

Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy

Changes in oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb) concentrations in the prefrontal cortex were measured with the PortaLite fNIRS system (Artinis Medical Systems, Elst, the Netherlands). The system uses near infrared light, which is transmitted at 2 wavelengths, 760 and 850 nm. Data were sampled with a frequency of 10 Hz. The PortaLite uses wireless technology (Bluetooth), allowing participants to walk without the restriction of wires. Two probes were placed on the right and left forehead of the participants. Probes were positioned at a height of 15% of the nasion-inion distance from nasion and at 7% of the head circumference to the left and right from midline, to avoid measuring the midline sinus. These locations roughly target left and right Brodmann’s areas 10, the dorsolateral and anterior prefrontal cortex (PFC).^41,42 The probes were shielded from ambient light by covering the forehead with black fabric. Oxysoft version 3.0.52 (Artinis Medical Systems, Elst, the Netherlands) was used for data collection.

Based on different absorption spectra, concentration changes of HbO2 and HHb in the targeted PFC were calculated from the changes in detected light intensity using the modified Lambert-Beer law, assuming constant scattering.⁴³ The PortaLite has 3 transmitters and 1 receiver, with transmitter-receiver distances of 30, 35, and 40 mm. The concentrations of HbO2 and HHb were exported to MATLAB (MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2012b, The MathWorks, Inc, Natick, MA) for further data processing. A bandpass filter with frequencies of 0.01 to 0.14 Hz was used to reduce physiological noise such as heart beat and drift of the signal. To remove motion artifacts, a wavelet filter was used,^44,45 followed by correlation based signal improvement (CBSI).^44-46 HbO2 concentration signals of the three channels of each probe were then averaged, resulting in an HbO2 signal for the left and right PFC. For each trial, the average concentration of HbO2 during task performance, and during the 5 seconds before the task (referred to as the baseline) were calculated. Consistent with previous studies of fNIRS signals, each baseline concentration was subtracted from the average concentration during task performance to evaluate the relative change in HbO2 concentration during specific tasks.^{11,27,29,47-49} All trials were averaged per task, resulting in 2 HbO2 concentrations for each task (left and right PFC). Since no left-right differences were present (P > .296), we averaged left and right PFC HbO2 concentrations for further analyses.

Behavioral Task Performance

Gait was measured using electronic walkway with pressure sensors embedded in a carpet. The walkways were connected to a personal computer using PKMAS software (ProtoKinetics, Havertown, PA) for processing and data storing. In order to characterize the performance of usual and DT walking, 2 key measurements of walking, gait speed and stride length, were analyzed and presented.⁵⁰ For obstacle negotiation, gait speed and the duration of stepping over the obstacle for each step (in seconds) were obtained. We also calculated the percentage change in step duration (seconds) between steps over the obstacles and normal steps during the obstacle walk. Serial subtraction performance was measured by calculating the percent of correct responses from the total responses for each trial. DT cost was calculated as ([dual task − single task)/single task] × 100) for both gait measures.

Statistical Analyses

Means and standard errors were calculated for all dependent variables. Differences in levels of HbO2 between groups (ie, healthy older adults and patients with PD) and tasks (ie, usual walk, DT, and obstacle negotiation) were analyzed using a linear mixed model, including the interaction between group and task. We also included the factors age, gender, gait speed, and executive function index to control for group differences. Linear mixed models with the factors age and gender were used to analyze group and task differences in the behavioral performance outcome measures. For linear mixed models on HbO2 concentrations, random intercepts were allowed between participants since it improved model estimations. For all models, a covariance matrix was set for variance components. Post hoc test P values were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons. Association between prefrontal activation and task performance between the 2 complex tasks (dual tasking and obstacle negotiation) and usual walking was explored using Pearson correlation coefficients. The association between performance and prefrontal activation within tasks was also explored using Pearson correlation coefficients between HbO2 levels and behavioral performance measures. Statistical significance was assumed when the (corrected) P value was less than or equal to .05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 18.

Results

Participants

Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. No differences in age and gender were observed between groups. Patients with PD had lower scores on all cognitive measures including the Mini-Mental State Examination and computerized cognitive tests, compared with the healthy older adults. As expected, patients with PD performed worse on tests of mobility.

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics.^a

Domain	Variable	Older Adults (n = 38)	Patients With PD (n = 68)	Between Groups P Value
Demographic	Age (years)	70.4 ± 0.9	71.6 ± 0.9	.346
	Gender (male/female)	20/18	46/22	.147
	MMSE (max 30)	28.8 ± 0.2	28.2 ± 0.2	.024
Disease severity	Disease duration (years)	NA	9.1 ± 0.7	NA
Disease severity	UPDRS Motor part	NA	32.9 ± 1.7	NA
Computerized cognitive test^b	Executive function	102.8 ± 1.8	87.9 ± 1.3	<.001
	Visual-spatial	103.1 ± 3.3	94.6 ± 1.9	.032
	Attention	101.1 ± 1.6	88.6 ± 1.9	<.001
Mobility tests	FSST (s)	8.7 ± 0.5	14.5 ± 0.9	<.001
Mobility tests	2MWT (m)	152.6 ± 4.3	119.8 ± 4.3	<.001

Abbreviations: PD, Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; FSST, Four Step Square Test; 2MWT, 2-Minute Walk Test; NA, not applicable.

Entries are the mean ± standard error or ratio, as indicated.

Score of a 100 representing the age and education normed value.

Changes in Frontal Lobe Activation

Significant differences in HbO2 levels between walking conditions were found (P < .001) (Table 2 and Figure 1). In addition, the effect of walking conditions on HbO2 levels significantly differed between groups (group × condition interaction; P = .011). In the healthy older adults, frontal activation increased during DT walking compared with usual walking (P < .001), and a trend toward significant change was observed during obstacle negotiation (P = .053). In marked contrast, in patients with PD, HbO2 levels did not increase during dual task walking (P = .122), but did increase during obstacle negotiation, compared with usual walking (P = .001) (Table 2). In addition, we observed a significant difference in the relative increase in HbO2 during DT compared with usual walking (ie, delta) between groups (P = .008) (Table 2). When executive function was included as a covariate, this difference in the delta was no longer significant (P = .156).

Table 2.

Oxygenated Hemoglobin (HbO2) Concentrations During the Different Walking Tasks.^a

Group	Usual Walking	DT Walking	Obstacle Negotiation	Delta (DT vs Usual)	Delta (Obstacle vs Usual)
Healthy older adults	0.14 ± 0.04	0.34 ± 0.05*	0.25 ± 0.04	0.19 ± 0.05^#	0.10 ± 0.03
Patients with PD	0.24 ± 0.02	0.29 ± 0.03	0.33 ± 0.03*	0.05 ± 0.03	0.07 ± 0.02

Abbreviation: DT, dual task; PD, Parkinson’s disease.

Post hoc within-group difference: *significant difference between complex walking and usual walking. Post hoc between-group difference: ^#significant difference between healthy older adults and patients with PD.

Figure 1.

Oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) levels during the 3 walking conditions in each group. A significant difference between usual walking and dual task walking was observed in the healthy older adults. In contrast, in the patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), the HbO2 level was significantly higher during obstacle negotiation walking, compared with usual walking.

Between-group comparisons for each condition separately revealed a significantly larger increase in HbO2 level during usual walking in the patients with PD, compared with the older adults (P = .050). No significant differences between groups were observed during DT walking (P = .264) or obstacle negotiation (P = .221).

Gender significantly influenced HbO2 levels, with men having higher HbO2 levels than women in all tasks (P = .002). No significant interaction effects between gender × walking condition (P = .524), gender × group (P = .163), or gender × walking condition × group (P = .550) were found, suggesting that differential effects of walking conditions between groups were not affected by gender.

Behavioral Results

Table 3 shows between-group comparisons of functional performance on the 3 walking conditions. As expected, patients with PD performed worse than the healthy older adults in all 3 walking conditions. The stride length was shorter, gait speed was lower, and percentage of correct subtractions was lower in the patients with PD. Dual task costs for gait were significantly higher in the patients with PD than in the older adults. Similarly, the effect of obstacle negotiation on gait speed was higher in the patients with PD than in the older adults.

Table 3.

Differences in Performance of Walking Conditions Between Groups.

Task	Variable	Healthy Older Adults	Patients with PD	Between-Groups P Value
Usual walking	Stride length (cm)	127.8 ± 1.9	109.0 ± 1.9	<.001
Usual walking	Gait speed (cm/s)	115.5 ± 1.5	96.3 ± 1.8	<.001
Dual task walk	Stride length (cm)	127.3 ± 2.1	98.4 ± 2.2	<.001
Dual task walk	Gait speed (cm/s)	111.1 ± 1.8	82.6 ± 2.0	<.001
Obstacle walk	Gait speed (cm/s)	108.4 ± 1.3	83.7 ± 1.9	<.001
	Step over duration (ms)	610.0 ± 10.0	650.0 ± 10.0	<.001
	Change in step duration (%)	22.0 ± 1.0	40.0 ± 2.0	<.001
Subtraction	Subtraction walking (% correct response)	96.2 ± 1.0	89.4 ± 1.6	.001
Dual task cost	Stride length (%)	−2.8 ± 0.5	−11.7 ± 1.0^a	<.001
Dual task cost	Gait speed (%)	−5.8 ± 1.2	−16.6 ± 1.1^a	<.001
Obstacle negotiation cost	Gait speed (%)	−5.1 ± 0.9	−14.0 ± 1.2^a	<.001

Abbreviation: PD, Parkinson’s disease.

Significant difference between complex walking and usual walking.

Associations Between HbO2 Levels and Behavioral Measures

No significant correlations between HbO2 levels during walking conditions and gait speed were found in the healthy older adults. In contrast, in patients with PD, a positive correlation was found between level of HbO2 and gait speed during obstacle negotiation walking (r = 0.326, P = .008); a higher level of activation was associated with higher gait speed. In addition, more severe disease symptoms (as evaluated using the UPDRS) were associated with lower levels of HbO2 during usual walking (r = −0.280, P = .022) and obstacle negotiation walking (r = −0.355, P = .003).

Comparison between delta HbO2 of DT and usual walking (change in frontal activation) and dual task cost for gait speed (change in behavioral measure) revealed different patterns in healthy older adults and patients with PD. In the healthy older adults, a large increase in HbO2 during DT, compared with usual walking coincided with low dual task cost for gait speed. In the patients with PD, small increase in HbO2 of DT, compared with usual walking, coincided with high DT cost for gait speed (Figure 2A). On the other hand, comparison between delta HbO2 of obstacle negotiation and usual walking (change in frontal activation) and obstacle negotiation cost for gait speed (change in behavioral measure) revealed similar change in delta HbO2 in both groups but differences in obstacle negotiation costs between groups. While healthy older adults had low obstacle negotiation cost for gait speed, patients with PD had a high obstacle negotiation cost for gait speed (Figure 2B). No significant correlations between HbO2 levels and mobility tests were found.

Figure 2.

Comparison between relative increase (delta) in oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) during walking conditions (gray bars) and behavioral measures of the absolute % cost (black squares) in healthy older adults and patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). (A) Delta HbO2 of dual task (DT) and usual walking and dual task cost for gait speed. (B) Delta HbO2 of obstacle negotiation and usual walking and obstacle negotiation cost for gait speed.

Discussion

Our study is, to our knowledge, the first to report that prefrontal activation during usual walking and complex walking change in patients with PD. In contrast to healthy older adults, patients with PD showed a significant increase in prefrontal activation during obstacle negotiation and only a slight increase in activation during dual task walking, as compared with usual walking. However, during usual walking, higher HbO2 levels were observed in patients with PD as compared with healthy older adults.

The higher level of HbO2 in Brodmann area (BA) 10, a region that reflects the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), during usual walking in patients with PD may reflect the need for utilization of cognitive resources even in this relatively “simple” task. The association between cognitive abilities and BA 10 activation is supported by the finding that after adjusting for the executive function score the group difference in the change in HbO2 values is no longer significant. The use of cognitive resources to compensate for the deficits associated with PD stands in line with a recently suggested model.^32-34 This model proposes that during walking, patients with PD may attempt to compensate for deficits in automaticity by switching to increased cognitive control, in particular executive control.³⁴ However, deficits in executive control limit this ability. Therefore, during more challenging walking conditions, the system may not be able to adequately respond, producing marked behavioral changes and in some cases, falls. The present results in the patients with PD are, to some degree, consistent with this model.

The high activation during usual walking observed in patients with PD suggests 2 possible scenarios during complex walking tasks. One is a further increase in frontal activation as observed in healthy older adults. The other is inability to further increase activation due to saturation (a ceiling effect), which results in lower performance. Our results show that patients with PD only slightly increased activation during dual task walking. This may provide a possible explanation to the reduced performance of the cognitive task, and the higher dual task cost for gait speed observed in patients with PD. Indeed, we found correlations that indicate that patients with higher prefrontal activation during usual walking and obstacle negotiation had lower disease severity and better gait performance. In addition, in healthy older adults the higher frontal activation was associated with lower dual task cost. This suggests that sufficient frontal activation is required to maintain stable gait that is not affected by the cognitive competition in the presence of the secondary task.

The further increase in HbO2 concentrations during obstacle negotiation in patients with PD reveals that the attenuated response is specific to DT and is actually not a result of HbO2 saturation. Perhaps during walking while negotiating obstacles, the obstacles in the path forced the patients to allocate cognitive resources to motor planning. During DT, low priority could be given to the cognitive task, indicating they prioritize gait and minimized attention to the cognitive task, which may also explain the low performance. However, the high obstacle negotiation cost for gait speed found in patients with PD indicates that this increase in prefrontal activation is not sufficient to compensate for the motor deficits associated with PD.^27,29,51 The ability of healthy older adults to maintain gait speed in tasks that pose higher motor and cognitive load as dual tasking and obstacle negotiation can be explained, at least in part, by the alterations in level of frontal activation.

The differences in levels of prefrontal activation between DT and obstacle negotiation can be further explained by the nature of the tasks. Whereas obstacle negotiation can be viewed as an externally driven process, dual tasking is considered an internally driven process. Externally and internally driven processes have been associated with distinct patterns of brain activation. Previous work has shown that externally driven processes are associated with activation of caudal supplementary motor area and posterior occipital-temporal areas while internally driven processes involve greater activation of the rostral supplementary motor area and its adjacent cingulate cortex, as well as the DLPFC.^52,53 This might explain the lower prefrontal activation during obstacle negotiation as compared to dual tasking in healthy older adults.

This study has a number of limitations. For example, the fNIRS system that was used included only 2 probes placed on the forehead. This limited our ability to assess activation in other regions of the brain and the involvement of other neural networks. It also limits our capacity to interpret the results in the context other than the DLPFC. Future studies should investigate a more generalized approach, perhaps with more fNIRS probes or other imaging techniques. In addition, fNIRS has good temporal but limited spatial resolution compared to traditional neuroimaging methods as fMRI. We also did not control for superficial hemodynamics^54,55 or systemic changes like blood flow or heart rate. Thus, we cannot rule out the influence of these factors, which might have changed during task performance.⁵⁶ However, these factors were likely similar between walking tasks and thus cannot explain differences in HbO2 between tasks, or between healthy older adults and patients with PD. In addition, it will be interesting to investigate changes in frontal activation during the OFF state and to explore the associations between changes in HbO2 and other gait features. One more point that should be considered in future studies is randomize the order of the walking conditions to ensure that this did not play a role in the observed results.

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that the specific nature of complex walking plays an important role in dictating the involvement of the frontal lobe in gait. In healthy older adults, a cognitive task apparently leads to increased frontal lobe activation, while obstacle negotiation does to a much lesser extent. The opposite is true in patients with PD. These findings may have important implications for rehabilitation of gait in patients with PD. It suggests 2 complementary approaches for improving gait in more complex conditions in patients with PD: (a) increasing the efficiency of neural control (ie, lower frontal activation) during simple tasks and (b) extending capacity by improving frontal lobe recruitment and increasing cognitive and motor abilities. Nonetheless, future work is needed to confirm these findings and to further explore the factors that lead to increased frontal lobe activation only in specific circumstances.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participants and partners in the V-TIME project including the Institute for Aging and Health, University of Newcastle (UNEW), Department of Neurosciences Universita Degli Studi Di Genova (UNIGE); Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULeuven), University of Sassari in Sardinia (UNISS), Inition 3D technologies (INITION), Advanced Drug Development Services (ADDS) and Beacon Tech Limited (BTL) for their contribution.

Authors’ Note

Inbal Maidan and Freek Nieuwhof share first authorship.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The project was funded in part by the European Commission (FP7 project V-TIME- 278169).

References

Donovan

Lord

McNaughton

Weatherall

. Mobility beyond the clinic: the effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:556-563.

Patla

Shumway-Cook

. Dimensions of mobility: defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. J Aging Phys Act. 1999;7:7-19.

Shumway-Cook

Patla

Stewart

Ferrucci

Ciol

Guralnik

. Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities. Phys Ther. 2002;82:670-681.

Galna

Murphy

Morris

. Obstacle crossing in people with Parkinson’s disease: foot clearance and spatiotemporal deficits. Hum Mov Sci. 2010;29:843-852.

Rochester

Hetherington

Jones

. Attending to the task: interference effects of functional tasks on walking in Parkinson’s disease and the roles of cognition, depression, fatigue, and balance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1578-1585.

Shumway-Cook

Patla

Stewart

Ferrucci

Ciol

Guralnik

. Environmental components of mobility disability in community-living older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:393-398.

Yogev

Giladi

Peretz

Springer

Simon

Hausdorff

. Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity, and Parkinson’s disease: which aspects of gait are attention demanding? Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1248-1256.

Royall

Lauterbach

Cummings

. Executive control function: a review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;14:377-405.

Chapman

Hollands

. Evidence that older adult fallers prioritise the planning of future stepping actions over the accurate execution of ongoing steps during complex locomotor tasks. Gait Posture. 2007;26:59-67.

10.

Hausdorff

Schweiger

Herman

Yogev-Seligmann

Giladi

. Dual-task decrements in gait: contributing factors among healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:1335-1343.

11.

Holtzer

Wang

Verghese

. Performance variance on walking while talking tasks: theory, findings, and clinical implications. Age (Dordr). 2014;36:373-381.

12.

Aarsland

Brønnick

Larsen

Tysnes

Alves

. Cognitive impairment in incident, untreated Parkinson disease: the Norwegian ParkWest study. Neurology. 2009;72:1121-1126.

13.

Muslimovic

Post

Speelman

Schmand

. Cognitive profile of patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2005;65:1239-1245.

14.

Tamura

Kikuchi

Otsuki

Kitagawa

Tashiro

. Deficits of working memory during mental calculation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2003;209:19-23.

15.

Watson

Leverenz

. Profile of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:640-645.

16.

Lord

Smith

Menant

. Vision and falls in older people: risk factors and intervention strategies. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:569-581.

17.

Plotnik

Dagan

Gurevich

Giladi

Hausdorff

. Effects of cognitive function on gait and dual tasking abilities in patients with Parkinson’s disease suffering from motor response fluctuations. Exp Brain Res. 2011;208:169-179.

18.

Doi

Makizako

Shimada

. Brain activation during dual-task walking and executive function among older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a fNIRS study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013;25:539-544.

19.

Snijders

Leunissen

Bakker

. Gait-related cerebral alterations in patients with Parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait. Brain. 2011;134(pt 1):59-72.

20.

Wai

Wang

Weng

. Cortical involvement in a gait-related imagery task: comparison between Parkinson’s disease and normal aging. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:537-542.

21.

Wang

Wai

Weng

. Functional MRI in the assessment of cortical activation during gait-related imaginary tasks. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2009;116:1087-1092.

22.

Galna

Lord

Daud

Archibald

Burn

Rochester

. Visual sampling during walking in people with Parkinson’s disease and the influence of environment and dual-task. Brain Res. 2012;1473:35-43.

23.

Kovacs

. Age-related changes in gait and obstacle avoidance capabilities in older adults: a review. J Appl Gerontol. 2005;24:21-34.

24.

Stegemoller

Buckley

Pitsikoulis

Barthelemy

Roemmich

Hass

. Postural instability and gait impairment during obstacle crossing in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:703-709.

25.

Koechlin

Ody

Kouneiher

. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science. 2003;302:1181-1185.

26.

Ridderinkhof

van den Wildenberg

Segalowitz

Carter

. Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain Cogn. 2004;56:129-140.

27.

Holtzer

Mahoney

Izzetoglu

Onaral

Verghese

. fNIRS study of walking and walking while talking in young and old individuals. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66:879-887.

28.

Holtzer

Mahoney

Izzetoglu

Wang

England

Verghese

. Online fronto-cortical control of simple and attention-demanding locomotion in humans. Neuroimage. 2015;112:152-159.

29.

Mirelman

Maidan

Bernad-Elazari

. Increased frontal brain activation during walking while dual tasking: an fNIRS study in healthy young adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:85.

30.

Koerts

Leenders

Brouwer

. Cognitive dysfunction in non-demented Parkinson’s disease patients: controlled and automatic behavior. Cortex. 2009;45:922-929.

31.

Lewis

Dove

Robbins

Barker

Owen

. Cognitive impairments in early Parkinson’s disease are accompanied by reductions in activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry. J Neurosci. 2003;23:6351-6356.

32.

Kucinski

Albin

Lustig

Sarter

. Modeling falls in Parkinson’s disease: slow gait, freezing episodes and falls in rats with extensive striatal dopamine loss. Behav Brain Res. 2015;282:155-164.

33.

Sarter

Albin

Kucinski

Lustig

. Where attention falls: increased risk of falls from the converging impact of cortical cholinergic and midbrain dopamine loss on striatal function. Exp Neurol. 2014;257:120-129.

34.

Vandenbossche

Deroost

Soetens

. Freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: disturbances in automaticity and control. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;6:356.

35.

Folstein

McHugh

. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.

36.

Doniger

Dwolatzky

Zucker

. Computerized cognitive testing battery identifies mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia even in the presence of depressive symptoms. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2006;21:28-36.

37.

Dite

Temple

. A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1566-1571.

38.

Brooks

Davis

Naglie

. The feasibility of six-minute and two-minute walk tests in in-patient geriatric rehabilitation. Can J Aging. 2007;26:159-162.

39.

Rossier

Wade

. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:9-13.

40.

Goetz

Fahn

Martinez-Martin

. Movement Disorder Society–sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord. 2007;22:41-47.

41.

Maidan

Bernad-Elazari

Gazit

Giladi

Hausdorff

Mirelman

. Changes in oxygenated hemoglobin link freezing of gait to frontal activation in patients with Parkinson disease: an fNIRS study of transient motor-cognitive failures. J Neurol. 2015;262:899-908.

42.

Okamoto

Dan

Shimizu

. Multimodal assessment of cortical activation during apple peeling by NIRS and fMRI. Neuroimage. 2004;21:1275-1288.

43.

Sakatani

Yamashita

Yamanaka

. Changes of cerebral blood oxygenation and optical pathlength during activation and deactivation in the prefrontal cortex measured by time-resolved near infrared spectroscopy. Life Sci. 2006;78:2734-2741.

44.

Brigadoi

Ceccherini

Cutini

. Motion artifacts in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a comparison of motion correction techniques applied to real cognitive data. Neuroimage. 2014;85(pt 1):181-191.

45.

Cooper

Selb

Gagnon

. A systematic comparison of motion artifact correction techniques for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:147.

46.

Cui

Bray

Reiss

. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signal improvement based on negative correlation between oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin dynamics. Neuroimage. 2010;49:3039-3046.

47.

Ferrari

Quaresima

. A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. Neuroimage. 2012;63:921-935.

48.

Holtzer

Verghese

Allali

Izzetoglu

Wang

Mahoney

. Neurological gait abnormalities moderate the functional brain signature of the posture first hypothesis. Brain Topogr. 2016;29:334-343.

49.

Leff

Orihuela-Espina

Elwell

. Assessment of the cerebral cortex during motor task behaviours in adults: a systematic review of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies. Neuroimage. 2011;54:2922-2936.

50.

Morris

Iansek

Matyas

Summers

. Abnormalities in the stride length-cadence relation in Parkinsonian gait. Mov Disord. 1998;13:61-69.

51.

Bonelli

Cummings

. Frontal-subcortical circuitry and behavior. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2007;9:141-151.

52.

Francois-Brosseau

Martinu

Strafella

Petrides

Simard

Monchi

. Basal ganglia and frontal involvement in self-generated and externally-triggered finger movements in the dominant and non-dominant hand. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;29:1277-1286.

53.

Jenkins

Jahanshahi

Jueptner

Passingham

Brooks

. Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. Brain. 2000;123(pt 6):1216-1228.

54.

Gagnon

Yucel

Dehaes

. Quantification of the cortical contribution to the NIRS signal over the motor cortex using concurrent NIRS-fMRI measurements. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3933-3940.

55.

Kirilina

Jelzow

Heine

. The physiological origin of task-evoked systemic artefacts in functional near infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2012;61:70-81.

56.

Takahashi

Takikawa

Kawagoe

Shibuya

Iwano

Kitazawa

. Influence of skin blood flow on near-infrared spectroscopy signals measured on the forehead during a verbal fluency task. Neuroimage. 2011;57:991-1002.

The Role of the Frontal Lobe in Complex Walking Among Patients With Parkinson’s Disease and Healthy Older Adults

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Participants

Procedures

Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy

Behavioral Task Performance

Statistical Analyses

Results

Participants

Changes in Frontal Lobe Activation

Behavioral Results

Associations Between HbO2 Levels and Behavioral Measures

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Authors’ Note

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References