Background. Recent studies have proposed a role for robotic gait training in participants with acquired brain injury, but the effects on the excitability of cortical and spinal neurons even in healthy participants are uncertain. Objective. To investigate changes in corticospinal excitability in healthy participants after active and passive robotic gait training in a driven gait orthosis (DGO), the Lokomat. Methods. Thirteen healthy participants took part in 2 experiments. Each participant performed 20 minutes of active and passive gait training in a DGO. Motor evoked potentials (MEP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), F-wave frequency, and Mmax were measured in the right tibialis anterior muscle before and after training. Results. Active training led to a decline in MEP amplitude and F-wave frequency. The MEP decline was associated with subjective muscle fatigue. Passive training induced a decrease in SICI lasting for 20 minutes after training. Conclusions. The decline in MEP after active training is most likely because of central fatigue, whereas the decreased F-wave frequency might represent short-term plastic changes in the spinal cord. The decrease in SICI after passive training probably reflects a decrease in intracortical GABA activity, which could benefit the acquisition of new motor skills.
Barker AT, Jalinous R., Freeston ILNon-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985;1(8437):1106-1107.
2.
Kujirai T., Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1993;471:501-519.
3.
Di Lazzaro V. , Pilato F., Dileone M., et al. Segregating two inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex at the level of GABAA receptor subtypes: a TMS study . Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:2207-2214.
4.
Ljubisavljevic M.Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the motor learning-associated cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res . 2006;173:215-222.
5.
Pascual-Leone A., Nguyet D., Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A., Hallett M.Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74(3):1037-1045.
6.
Classen J., Liepert J., Wise SP, Hallett M., Cohen LGRapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice . J Neurophysiol. 1998;79(2):1117-1123.
7.
Bütefisch CM , Davis BC, Wise SP, et al. Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(7): 3661-3665.
8.
Liepert J., Graef S., Uhde I., Leidner O., Weiller C.Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients . Acta Neurol Scand. 2000;101(5):321-326.
9.
Koski L., Mernar TJ, Dobkin BHImmediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output in response to rehabilitation: correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke . Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(4):230-249.
Lewis GN, Byblow WDThe effects of repetitive proprioceptive stimulation on corticomotor representation in intact and hemiplegic individuals. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(4):765-773.
12.
Lotze M., Braun C., Birbaumer N., Anders S., Cohen LGMotor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain . 2003;126(4):866-872.
13.
Perez MA, Lungholt BK, Nyborg K., Nielsen JBMotor skill training induces changes in the excitability of the leg cortical area in healthy humans. Exp Brain Res. 2004 ;159(2):197-205.
14.
Jensen JL, Marstrand PC, Nielsen JBMotor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. J Appl Physiol . 2005;99(2):1558-1568.
15.
Mayr A., Kofler M., Quirbach E., Matzak H., Fröhlich K., Saltuari L.Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:307-314.
16.
Husemann B. , Müller F., Krewer C., Heller S., Koenig E.Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke . 2007;38(2):349-354.
17.
Hidler JM, Wall AEAlterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking . Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(2):184-193.
18.
Regnaux JP, Saremi K., Marehbian J., Bussel B., Dobkin BHAn accelerometry-based comparison of 2 robotic assistive devices for treadmill training of gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(4):348-354.
19.
Puksa L., Stâlberg E., Falck B.Reference values of F-wave parameters in healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(6):1079-1090.
20.
Stokic DS, McKay WB, Scott L., Sherwood AM, Dimitrijevic MRIntracortical inhibition of lower limb motor-evoked potentials after paired transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 1997;117(3):437-443.
21.
Maruyama A., Matsunaga K., Tanaka N., Rothwell JCMuscle fatigue decreases short-interval intracortical inhibition after exhaustive intermittent tasks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 ;117(4):864-870.
22.
Ziemann U., Lönnecker S., Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W.The effect of lorazepam on the motor cortical excitability in man . Exp Brain Res. 1996;109(1): 127-135.
23.
Werhahn KJ, Kunesch E., Noachtar S., Benecke R., Classen J.Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans. J Physiol. 1999;517(2):591-597.
24.
Verin E., Ross E., Demoule A., et al. Effects of exhaustive incremental treadmill exercise on diaphragm and quadriceps motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation . J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(1): 253-259.
25.
Taylor JL, Gandevia SCTranscranial magnetic stimulation and human muscle fatigue. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(1):18-29.
26.
Dobkin B.Fatigue versus activity-dependent fatigability in patients with central or peripheral motor impairments. Neurorehabil Neural Repair . 2008;22(2):105-110.
27.
Zanette G., Bonato C., Polo A., Tinazzi M., Manganotti P., Fiaschi A.Long-lasting depression of motor-evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation following exercise. Exp Brain Res. 1995;107(1):80-86.
28.
Ziemann U., Muellbacher W., Hallett M., Cohen LGModulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex . Brain. 2001;124(6): 1171-1181.
29.
Levy LM, Ziemann U., Chen R., Cohen LGRapid modulation of GABA in sensorimotor cortex induced by acute deafferentation . Ann Neurol. 2002;52(6):755-761.
30.
McDonnell MN , Orekhov Y., Ziemann U.The role of GABA(B) receptors in intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2006;173(1):86-93.
31.
Sanes JN, Donoghue JPPlasticity and primary motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci . 2000;23:393-415.
Muellbacher W., Richards C., Ziemann U. et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2002 ;59(8):1278-1282.
34.
Dobkin B., Barbeau H., Deforge D., et al. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized spinal cord injury locomotor trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(1):25-35.
35.
Milanov IGA comparison of methods to assess the excitability of lower motoneurones . Can J Neurol Sci. 1992;19(1):64-68.
36.
Lin JZ, Floeter MK. Do F-wave measurements detect changes in motor neuron excitability ? Muscle Nerve. 2004;30(3):289-294.
Liepert J., Kotterba S., Tegenthoff M., Malin JPCentral fatigue assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Muscle Nerve. 1996;19(11):1429-1434.
39.
McKay WB , Tuel SM, Sherwood AM, Stokic DS, Dimitrijevic MRFocal depression of cortical excitability induced by fatiguing muscle contraction: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Exp Brain Res. 1995; 105(2):276-282.
40.
Ljubisavljevic M., Milanovic S., Radovanovic S., Vukcevic I., Kostic V., Anastasijevic R.Central changes in muscle fatigue during sustained submaximal isometric voluntary contraction as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101(4): 281-288.
41.
Nørgaard P. , Nielsen JF, Andersen H.Post-exercise facilitation of compound muscle action potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects . Exp Brain Res. 2000;132(4):517-522.
42.
Mazzocchio R., Kitago T., Liuzzi G., Wolpaw JR, Cohen LGPlastic changes in the human H-reflex pathway at rest following skillful cycling training . Clin Neurophysiol . 2006;117:1682-1691.
43.
Meunier SO, Kwon J., Russmann H., Ravindran S., Mazzocchio R., Cohen L.Spinal use-dependent plasticity of synaptic transmission in humans after a single cycling session. J Physiol. 2007;579:375-388.
44.
Perez MA, Lungholt BK, Nielsen JBPresynaptic control of group Ia afferents in relation to acquisition of a visuo-motor skill in healthy humans. J Physiol. 2005;568(1):343-354.
45.
Dietz V., Duysens J.Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review. Gait Posture. 2000;11(2):102-110.
46.
Dietz V., Müller R., Colombo G.Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain. 2002;125(12): 2626-2634.
47.
Nielsen J., Crone C., Hultborn H.H-reflexes are smaller in dancers from The Royal Danish Ballet than in well-trained athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1993;66(2):116-121.
48.
Scivoletto G., Ivanenko Y., Morganti , B., et al. Plasticity of spinal centers in spinal cord injury patients: new concepts for gait evaluation and training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:358-365.
