The Test-Retest Reliability of 2 Mobility Performance Tests in Patients With Chronic Stroke

Abstract

Objective. This study examined test-retest agreement and measurement errors for the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) and the Mobility subscale of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (M-STREAM) in patients with chronic stroke and mild to moderate disability. The authors aimed to determine the level of agreement between test and retest as well as the extent to which a mobility score varies on test-retest measurements. Methods. Both mobility measures were tested on 50 chronic stroke patients twice, 7 days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1), a relative reliability index, was used to examine the level of agreement between test and retest. Absolute reliability indices, including the standard error of measurement and the smallest real differences, were used to determine the extent to which the mobility scores varied due to chance variation in measurement. Results. Test-retest agreements were excellent for both mobility measures. The standard errors of measurement of the RMI and the M-STREAM, representing the smallest change threshold that indicates a real improvement (beyond measurement error) for a group of individuals, were 0.8 and 1.5, respectively. The smallest real differences of the RMI and the M-STREAM, exhibiting the smallest change threshold that indicates a real improvement for a single individual, were 2.2 and 4.2, respectively. Conclusion. The RMI and the M-STREAM have high agreement between the test-retest measurements with acceptable measurement errors due to variation in measurement. The 2 measures can be used by clinicians and researchers to assess the mobility performance and monitor changes over time in stroke patients.

Keywords

Mobility Walking Stroke Outcome measures Reliability.

References

Hsueh IP , Wang CH , Sheu CF , et al. Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke . Stroke. 2003;34: 1741-1745 .

Logan PA , Gladman JR , Avery A. , et al. Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke . BMJ. 2004;329: 1372-1375 .

Lennon S. , Johnson L. The modified Rivermead Mobility Index: validity and reliability . Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22: 833-839 .

Atkinson G. , Nevill AM Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine . Sports Med. 1998 ;26: 217-238 .

Bland JM , Altman DG Measuring agreement in method comparison studies . Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8: 135-160 .

Hopkins WG Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science . Sports Med. 2000;30: 1-15 .

Rankin G. , Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses . Clin Rehabil. 1998;12: 187-199 .

Poole JL , Whitney SL Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69: 195-197 .

Sanford J. , Moreland J. , Swanson LR , et al. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke . Phys Ther. 1993 ;73: 447-454 .

10.

Berg K. , Wood-Dauphinee S. , Williams JI The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke . Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27: 27-36 .

11.

Benaim C. , Perennou DA , Villy J. , et al. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) . Stroke. 1999;30: 1862-1868 .

12.

Hsieh CL , Hsueh IP , Mao HF Validity and responsiveness of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients . Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000;32: 140-142 .

13.

Weir JP Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM . J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19: 231-240 .

14.

Patten C. , Kothari D. , Whitney J. , et al. Reliability and responsiveness of elbow trajectory tracking in chronic poststroke hemiparesis . J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40: 487-500 .

15.

Goldsmith CH , Boers M. , Bombardier C. , et al. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee . J Rheumatol. 1993;20: 561-565 .

16.

Beckerman H. , Roebroeck ME , Lankhorst GJ , et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness . Qual Life Res. 2001;10: 571-578 .

17.

Schuck P. , Zwingmann C. The `smallest real difference' as a measure of sensitivity to change: a critical analysis . Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26: 85-91 .

18.

Green J. , Forster A. , Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients . Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23: 670-676 .

19.

Daley K. , Mayo N. , Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores on the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure . Phys Ther. 1999;79: 8-23 .

20.

Collen FM , Wade DT , Robb GF , et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment . Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13: 50-54 .

21.

Carr JH , Shepherd RB , Nordholm L. , et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients . Phys Ther. 1985;65: 175-180 .

22.

Wang CH , Hsieh CL , Dai MH , et al. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (stream) instrument . J Rehabil Med. 2002;34: 20-24 .

23.

Antonucci G. , Aprile T. , Paolucci S. Rasch analysis of the Rivermead Mobility Index: a study using mobility measures of first-stroke inpatients . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83: 1442-1449 .

24.

Daley KA The power of unity . Am J Nurs. 1997;97: 80 .

25.

Wade DT , Collin C.

The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?

Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10: 64-67 .

26.

Mahoney FI , Barthel DW Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index . Md State Med J. 1965;14: 61-65 .

27.

Hsueh IP , Lin JH , Jeng JS , et al. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73: 188-190 .

28.

Hsueh IP , Lee MM , Hsieh CL Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients . J Formos Med Assoc. 2001 ;100: 526-532 .

29.

Shrout P. , Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability . Psychol Bull. 1979;86: 420-428 .

30.

Prince B. , Makrides L. , Richman J. Research methodology and applied statistics. Part 2: the literature search . Physiother Can. 1980;32: 201-206 .

31.

Altman DG , Bland JM Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies . Statistician. 1983;32: 307-317 .

32.

Smidt N. , van der Windt DA , Assendelft WJ , et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83: 1145-1150 .

33.

Brennan P. , Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures . BMJ. 1992;304: 1491-1494 .

34.

Fleiss J. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York : John Wiley ; 1986.

35.

Harris KD , Heer DM , Roy TC , et al. Reliability of a measurement of neck flexor muscle endurance . Phys Ther. 2005;85: 1349-1355 .

36.

Lexell JE , Downham DY How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation . Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84: 719-723 .