This article compares the structure and process of rehabilitation for stroke patients at 2 internationally recognized rehabilitation hospitals, Klinik Valens (“Valens”) in Switzerland and the William Donald Schaeffer Rehabilitation Hospital at Kernan (“Kernan”) in the United States. Although the patient mix, structure, and process of rehabilitation were similar in many regards, there were some important differences. Most notably, on average, patients at the U.S. hospital were discharged from rehabilitation at approximately the same day poststroke that rehabilitation began in Switzerland. Patients remained in an inpatient setting an average of 40 days longer in Switzerland (for the combination of acute care and rehabilitation) and had significantly higher levels of functioning at discharge when compared to their U.S. counterparts. The authors’ findings suggest that Europe may offer opportunities for rehabilitation research that would be difficult to duplicate in the United States and highlight policy-relevant questions for future studies aimed at developing efficient managed care systems for stroke survivors.
Public health and aging: hospitalizations for stroke among adults aged ≥ 65 years—United States, 2000. JAMA2003;290(8):1023-1024.
2.
Stineman MG, Maislin G, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke. Stroke1997;28(3):550-556.
3.
Dobkin B.The economic impact of stroke. Neurology1995;45(2 Suppl 1):S6-S9.
4.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Health care system facts and figures and 2002 data compendium. Retrieved 1 September 2003 from www.cms.gov/researchers.
5.
Buchanan JL, Rumpel JD, Hoenig H.Charges for outpatient rehabilitation: growth and differences in provider types. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996;77(4):320-328.
6.
Skinner J, Weinstein JN, Sporer SM, Wennberg JE. Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients. N Engl J Med2003;349(14):1350-1359.
7.
World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000: health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
8.
Jorger M, Beer S, Kesselring J.Impact of neurorehabilitation on disability in patients with acutely and chronically disabling diseases of the nervous system measured by the Extended Barthel Index. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2001;15(1):15-22.
9.
Nyein K, McMichael L, Turner-Stokes L.Can a Barthel score be derived from the FIM?Clin Rehabil1999;13(1):56-63.
10.
Hoenig H, Sloane R, Horner RD, Zolkewitz M, Duncan PW, Hamilton BB. A taxonomy for classification of stroke rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000;81(7):853-862.
11.
Hoenig H, Duncan PW, Horner RD, et al.Structure, process, and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Med Care2002;40(11):1036-1047.
12.
Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Adams HP, et al.Post stroke rehabilitation. Clinical practice guideline, No. 16 (AHCPR Publication No. 95-0662). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research; 1995.
13.
Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet1999;354(9174):191-196.
14.
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2002;72(4):473-479.
15.
Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil2000;14(4):361-369.
16.
Paci M.Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. J Rehabil Med2003;35(1):2-7.
17.
Bohannon RW, Lee N.Association of physical functioning with same-hospital readmission after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2004;83(6):434-438.
18.
Jorgensen HS, Kammersgaard LP, Nakayama H, et al.Treatment and rehabilitation on a stroke unit improves 5-year survival. A community-based study. Stroke1999;30(5):930-933.
19.
Stegmayr B, Asplund K, Hulter-Asberg K, et al.Stroke units in their natural habitat: can results of randomized trials be reproduced in routine clinical practice? Riks-Stroke Collaboration. Stroke1999;30(4):709-714.
20.
Payne KA, Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ, Craig Green TJ, Klittich WS. Long term cost-of-illness in stroke: an international review. Pharmacoeconomics2002;20(12):813-825.
21.
Evers SM, Ament AJ, Blaauw G.Economic evaluation in stroke research: a systematic review. Stroke2000;31(5):1046-1053.
22.
van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1999;66(4):480-484.
23.
Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, et al.The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil1995;17(1):10-14.
24.
Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, et al.Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation?Neurology2001;57(4):639-644.
25.
Jette AM, Haley SM, Ni P.Comparison of functional status tools used in post-acute care. Health Care Finance Rev2003;24(3):13-24.
26.
Duncan PW, Wallace D, Studenski S, Lai SM, Johnson D.Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: the stroke impact scale. Top Stroke Rehabil2001;8(2):19-33.
27.
Teasell RW, Kalra L.What’s new in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke2004;35(2):383-385.
28.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Key data on health care financing: Health Care Financing Review Medicare and Medicaid Statistical Supplement, 2001, Table 29. Retrieved 3 December 2004 from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Review/Supp/.
29.
Murray PK, Singer M, Dawson NV, Thomas CL, Cebul RD. Outcomes of rehabilitation services for nursing home residents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003;84(8):1129-1136.
