Immediate and Long-Term Changes in Corticomotor Output in Response to Rehabilitation: Correlation with Functional Improvements in Chronic Stroke

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of the corticomotor pathways might reflect and predict functional improvements during rehabilitation of a hemiparetic upper extremity. Ten patients with variable levels of functional impairment in upper extremity use were enrolled at least 3 months after a stroke. TMS was used to obtain serial measures of motor thresholds and motor-evoked potential (MEP) size for a muscle from both hands before and after each session of an intervention aimed at improving functional motor control. Functional ability and cortical map area and volume were measured before each therapy session. At intake, all TMS measures from the affected side were impaired compared with the unaffected side but they did not reliably predict the level of functional improvement. Motor thresholds decreased, whereas MEP amplitude and map size increased with treatment. The amount of change in affected side measures was correlated with the amount of improvement in hand/arm function. Normalization of MEP amplitude asymmetry in response to the 1st 2 therapy sessions predicted long-term improvement in Fugl-Meyer motor score. Within limits, TMS appears to be useful in both moderate and more impaired patients as a physiological assay of treatment-induced plasticity and behavioral gains. Methodological differences in the literature, however, currently obscure a full understanding of the potential contributions of TMS to rehabilitation research.

Keywords

Motor-evoked potential Transcranial magnetic stimulation Corticospinal excitability Recovery Stroke Plasticity Physical therapy Occupational therapy

References

1. Dobkin BH . The clinical science of neurologic rehabilitation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003.

2. Taub E , Miller NE , Novack TA , et al . Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(4):347-354.

3. Traversa R , Cicinelli P , Pasqualetti P , Filippi M , Rossini PM . Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the “affected” and “unaffected” hemispheres in human stroke. Brain Res 1998;803(1-2):1-8.

4. Byrnes ML , Thickbroom GW , Phillips BA , Mastaglia FL . Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke. Brain Res 2001;889(1-2):278-287.

5. Fujiwara T , Sonoda S , Okajima Y , Chino N . The relationships between trunk function and the findings of transcranial magnetic stimulation among patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med 2001;33(6): 249-255.

6. Liepert J , Bauder H , Wolfgang HR , Miltner WH , Taub E , Weiller C . Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31(6):1210-1216.

7. Liepert J , Uhde I , Graf S , Leidner O , Weiller C . Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol 2001;248(4):315-321.

8. Traversa R , Cicinelli P , Oliveri M , et al . Neurophysiological follow-up of motor cortical output in stroke patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111(9):1695-1703.

9. Netz J , Lammers T , Homberg V . Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain 1997;120(Pt 9):1579-1586.

10.

10. Wittenberg GF , Chen R , Ishii K , et al . Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17(1):48-57.

11.

11. Fridman EA , Hanakawa T , Chung M , Hummel F , Leiguarda RC , Cohen LG . Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke. Brain 2004;127(Pt 4):747-758.

12.

12. Cruz Martinez A , Munoz J , Palacios F . The muscle inhibitory period by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Study in stroke patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;38(3):189-192.

13.

13. Manganotti P , Patuzzo S , Cortese F , Palermo A , Smania N , Fiaschi A . Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113(6):936-943.

14.

14. Cicinelli P , Traversa R , Rossini PM . Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;105(6):438-450.

15.

15. Hendricks HT , Zwarts MJ , Plat EF , van Limbeek J . Systematic review for the early prediction of motor and functional outcome after stroke by using motor-evoked potentials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(9):1303-1308.

16.

16. Traversa R , Cicinelli P , Bassi A , Rossini PM , Bernardi G . Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 1997;28(1):110-117.

17.

17. Muellbacher W , Ziemann U , Boroojerdi B , Cohen L , Hallett M . Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Exp Brain Res 2001;136(4):431-438.

18.

18. Classen J , Liepert J , Wise SP , Hallett M , Cohen LG . Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 1998;79(2):1117-1123.

19.

19. Liepert J , Graef S , Uhde I , Leidner O , Weiller C . Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2000;101(5):321-326.

20.

20. Wassermann EM . Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108(1):1-16.

21.

21. Wolf SL , Lecraw DE , Barton LA , Jann BB . Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104(2):125-132.

22.

22. Wolf SL , Catlin PA , Ellis M , Archer AL , Morgan B , Piacentino A . Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32(7): 1635-1639.

23.

23. Morris DM , Uswatte G , Crago JE , Cook EW 3rd , Taub E . The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(6):750-755.

24.

24. Berglund K , Fugl-Meyer AR . Upper extremity function in hemiplegia. A cross-validation study of two assessment methods. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18(4):155-157.

25.

25. Filiatrault J , Arsenault AB , Dutil E , Bourbonnais D . Motor function and activities of daily living assessments: a study of three tests for persons with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45(9):806-810.

26.

26. Fugl-Meyer AR , Jaasko L , Leyman I , Olsson S , Steglind S . The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7(1):13-31.

27.

27. Miltner WH , Bauder H , Sommer M , Dettmers C , Taub E . Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999; 30(3):586-592.

28.

28. Winstein CJ , Rose DK , Tan SM , Lewthwaite R , Chui HC , Azen SP . A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(4):620-628.

29.

29. Brasil-Neto JP , Cohen LG , Panizza M , Nilsson J , Roth BJ , Hallett M . Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 9(1):132-136.

30.

30. Rossini PM , Barker AT , Berardelli A , et al . Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;91(2):79-92.

31.

31. Wassermann EM , McShane LM , Hallett M , Cohen LG . Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992;85(1):1-8.

32.

32. Ziemann U . Pharmacology of TMS. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 56:226-231.

33.

33. Mills KR . Magnetic stimulation of the human nervous system. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

34.

34. Mills KR , Nithi KA . Corticomotor threshold to magnetic stimulation: normal values and repeatability. Muscle Nerve 1997;20(5):570-576.

35.

35. Thickbroom GW , Sammut R , Mastaglia FL . Magnetic stimulation mapping of motor cortex: factors contributing to map area. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109(2):79-84.

36.

36. Wolf SL , Butler AJ , Campana GI , et al . Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115(8):1740-1747.

37.

37. Sterr A , Elbert T , Berthold I , Kolbel S , Rockstroh B , Taub E . Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(10):1374-1377.

38.

38. Page SJ , Sisto S , Levine P , McGrath RE . Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85(1):14-18.