Integrative Peacebuilding draws on integral theory, complexity theory, and mimetic theory to develop an integrative orientation that leads to integrative actions leading to peacebuilding actors mutually contributing to each other’s goals. The priority is to contribute to the well-being of those from Fragile or Conflict Affected States (FCAS); in particular, it is imperative to enhance the conditions under which they might take independent action to address their own challenges. All of this entails building relationships of mutual trust amongst and between intervening actors and their counterparts within FCAS.
AdamsR. (2000). Loving Mimesis and Girard’s “Scapegoat of the Text”: A creative reassessment of mimetic desire. In WillardS. (Ed), Violence renounced: René Girard, biblical studies, and peacemaking (pp. 277–307). Telford, England: Pandora Press.
2.
AutesserreS. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BergM.SchaeferB. (Eds.). (2009). Historical justice in international perspective: How societies are trying to right the wrongs of the past. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BohmD. (2004). On dialogue. London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1996)
5.
BohmD.PeatD. (1987). Science, order, and creativity. New York, NY: Bantam.
6.
CharbonneauB.ParentG. (Eds.). (2012). Peacebuilding, memory and reconciliation: Bridging top-down and bottom-up approaches. London, England: Routledge.
7.
CleynJ. (forthcoming). Epistemic justice and the truth and reconciliation commission recommendations. In RedekopV. N.RedekopG. Neufeld (Eds.), Transforming: Applying spirituality, emergent creativity, and reconciliation. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
8.
GewirthA. (1996). The community of rights. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
GirardR. (1987). Things hidden since the foundation of the world [original: Des choses cachées depuis la fonadation du monde] (Trans by BannS.MetteerM.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1978)
10.
HabermasJ. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vols. 1–2, McCarthyT. Trans.). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
11.
HermanJ. (1997). Trauma and recovery (Rev. ed.), New York, NY: Basic Books.
12.
KauffmanS. (2008). Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science, reason, and religion. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13.
KauffmanS. (2016). Humanity in a creative universe. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14.
LederachJ. (2005). The moral imagination: The art and soul of building peace. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
15.
LederachJ.ApplebyR. S. (2010). Strategic peacebuilding: An overview. In DanielO.PowersG. (Ed), Strategies of peace: Transforming conflict in a violent world (pp. 19–44). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16.
LemieuxS. (2018). The cascade of global norms: An integral and mimetic analysis of national and civil society leadership and partnership in the mine ban treaty (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Saint Paul University,Ottawa, Canada.
17.
LonerganB. (1978). Insight. New York, NY: Harper and Row. (Original work published 1958)
18.
LongW.BreckeP. (2003). War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19.
MacDonald-MinerM. (2013). The relationship between trauma (including posttraumatic stress) and reconciliation in transitioning societies: A comparative case study of Cambodia and Mozambique (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Mahidol University,Thailand.
20.
MacintyreA. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
21.
McGuiganR.PoppN. (2016). Integral conflict: The new science of conflict. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
22.
MitchellC. R. (2000). Gestures of conciliation: Factors contributing to successful olive branches. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
23.
RedekopV. (2002). From violence to blessing: How an understanding of deep-rooted conflict opens paths to reconciliation. Ottawa, Canada: Novalis.
24.
RedekopV.ParéS. (2010). Beyond control: A mutual respect approach to protest crowd—police relations. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
25.
RicoeurP. (1992). Oneself as another, Trans by BlameyKChicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1990)
26.
RicoeurP. (2000). The just. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
SchirchL. (2005). Ritual and symbol in peacebuilding. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
28.
TankinkM.BubenzerF. (2015). Healing communities, transforming society: Exploring the interconnectedness between psychosocial needs, practice and peacebuilding. Conference Report for a conference organised by the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation and the War Trauma Foundation. Retrieved from http://ijr.org.za/home/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/IJR-Healing-communities-conference-WEB.pdf
29.
ThiessenC. (2014). Local ownership of peacebuilding in Afghanistan: Shouldering responsibility for sustainable peace and development. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
30.
VolfM. (1996). Exclusion and embrace—A theological exploration of identity, otherness, and reconciliation. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
31.
WilberK. (2000). A brief history of everything. Boston, England: Shambhala.
