This article discusses the efficacy of community-based peacebuilding efforts to develop sustainable peace in conflict-torn communities. Using participatory action research (PAR) is a powerful means of developing sustainable solutions to a conflict: It provides the means to test peace theories and draw upon a community’s knowledge and strengths in order to develop interventions. The knowledge gained can be lost if not understood within national or regional contexts, particularly if there is divergence between interests that can destroy community-based peacebuilding accomplishments. Holistic approaches facilitate sustainable peace and foster learning applicable to other situations. Two case studies, Nigeria and Zimbabwe, identified broad principles that potentially can be applied in the development of policies and practices. In the Nigerian case, two communities had experienced years of conflict. The PAR component was based on participatory dialogue. In the Zimbabwe case, political conflict was resolved through the development of a mutually beneficial peace garden.
AdesoteS. A. (2017). Internal conflicts and forced migration in Nigeria: A historical perspective. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 11(1), 2–26.
2.
AghedoI. (2017). The ubiquity of violent conflicts in Nigeria. The Round Table, 106(1), 97–99.
AkanbiA. B. (2013). Inter-communal conflict and its impact on human security in Share and Tsaragi communities in kwara State (Masters thesis). M.A, University of Ilorin.
5.
AkandeO. D. (2019). Participatory dialogue for collective action in post-conflict communities in North-Central Nigeria[Doctoral thesis]. Durban University of Technology.
AutesserreS. (2017). International peacebuilding and local success: Assumptions and effectiveness. International Studies Review, 19, 114–132.
8.
BajjaN.OhanaY. (Eds.). (2012). T-KIT: Youth transforming conflict. Council of Europe Publishing.
9.
BauV. (2014). Communities and media in the aftermath of conflict: Participatory productions for reconciliation and peace. In WareH.JenkinsB.BranaganM. (Eds.), Cultivating peace: Contexts, practices and multidimensional models (pp. 266–282). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
10.
BilaliR.VollhardtJ. R.RarickJ. R. D. (2017). Modelling collective action through media to promote social change and positive intergroup relations in violent conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 200–211.
11.
BlazekM.HraňováP. (2012). Emerging relationships and diverse motivations and benefits in participatory video with young people. Children’s Geographies, 10(2), 51–168.
12.
BrattonM.DulaniB.MasunungureE. (2016). Detecting manipulation in authoritarian elections: Survey-based methods in Zimbabwe. Electoral Studies, 42, 10–21.
13.
BreakfastN.BradshawG.NomarwayiT. (2019). Violent service delivery protests in post-apartheid South Africa, 1994–2017—A conflict resolution perspective. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(1), 106–126.
14.
ChikwandaC. (2014). Combining sport and mediation skills for community healing. A multiple case study of two post-conflict communities in South Africa and Zimbabwe[Doctoral dissertation]. University of the Western Cape.
15.
ChinnP. L. (2013). Peace and power: New directions for building community. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
16.
ChitongoL.MagayaE. V. (2013). Cooperative gardens and rural development: The case of help German in Gutu ward 25 Zimbabwe. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability, 4(2), 191–217.
17.
ChivasaN. (2017). Efficacy of informal peace committees to peacebuilding: Evidence from Seke district, Zimbabwe. African Evaluation Journal, 5(2), 1–11.
18.
de ConingC. (2016). From peacebuilding to sustaining peace: Implications of complexity for resilience and sustainability. Resilience, 4(3), 166–181.
19.
DonaisT.McCandlessE. (2017). International peace building and the emerging inclusivity norm. Third World Quarterly, 38(2), 291–310.
20.
FatileO. (2011). Management of inter and intra state boundary conflicts in Nigeria: An empirical approach. Dorrance Publishing.
21.
FisherR. J. (2014). Intergroup conflict. In ColemanP. T.DeutschM.MarcusE. C. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 230–252). Jossey-Bass.
22.
FrancisD. (2002). People, peace and power: Conflict transformation in action. Pluto Press.
23.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
24.
FunkN. C. (2012). Building on what’s already there: Valuing the local in international peacebuilding. International Journal, 67(2), 391–408.
25.
HarrisG.VermaakC. (2015). Economic inequality as a source of interpersonal violence: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 18(1), 45–57.
26.
HewstoneM.LolliotS.SwartH.MyersE.VociA.Al RamiahA.CairnsE. (2014). Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(1), 39.
27.
JeongH. W. (2009). Conflict management and resolution: An introduction. Routledge.
28.
LeBasA. (2006). Polarisation as craft: Party formation and state violence in Zimbabwe. Comparative Politics, 38(4), 419–438.
29.
LederachJ. P. (2012). The origins and evolution of infrastructures for peace: A personal reflection. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 7(3), 8–13.
30.
LederachJ. P. (2015). Little book of conflict transformation: Clear articulation of the guiding principles by a pioneer in the field. Simon & Schuster.
31.
LeonardssonH.Gustav RuddG. (2015). The ‘local turn’ in peacebuilding: a literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 825–839.
32.
MattainiM. A. (2008). Ecosystems theory. In SowersK.DulmusC.ThyerB. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare (Vol. 2). Wiley.
33.
McEvoy-LevyS. (2011). Children, youth and peacebuilding. In MatyókT.SenehiJ.ByrneS. (Eds.), Critical issues in peace and conflict studies: Theory, practice, and pedagogy (pp. 159–176). Lexington Books.
34.
McKeownS.DixonJ. (2017). The “contact hypothesis”: Critical reflections and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12295.
35.
MiallH. (2004). Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. In AustinA.FischerM.RopersN. (Eds.), Transforming ethnopolitical conflict: The Berghof handbook. Springer Science & Business Media.
36.
MitchellC. (2002). Beyond resolution: What does conflict transformation actually transform?Peace and Conflict Studies, 9(1), 1–22.
37.
MkodzongiG.LawrenceP. (2019). The fast-track land reform and agrarian change in Zimbabwe. Review of African Political Economy, 46(159), 1–13.
38.
MoixB. (2016). Turning atrocity prevention inside-out: Community-based approaches to preventing, protecting, and recovering from mass violence. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 9(3), 59–69.
39.
MoyoS. (2013). Regime survival strategies in Zimbabwe in the 21st century. African Journal on Political Science and International Relations, 7, 67–68.
40.
MuchemwaC. (2015). Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe[Doctoral thesis]. Durban University of Technology.
41.
NascimentoD. (2017). International conflict resolution and peacebuilding strategies: The complexities of war and peace in the Sudans. Routledge.
42.
NyatsanzaW (2012). The Zimbabwe Catholic Bishops on the Land Issue 1959 – 2002. Harare: ZPH.9.
43.
ObajeT. A.Okeke-UzodikeN. (2013). The question of youth participation in peacebuilding processes in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. ACCORD Conference Paper, 2, 1–9.
44.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85.
45.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage Publications.
46.
RollK. (2016). The new local: Reappraising peacebuilding from the grassroots. International Studies Review, 18(3), 542–547.
47.
ShapiroI. (2006). Extending the framework of inquiry: Theories of change in conflict interventions. In BloomfieldD.FischerM.SchmezleB (Eds.), Social change and conflict transformation (pp. 61–68). Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.
48.
TesorieroJ. I. F. (2006). Community development: Community-based alternatives in an age of globalization (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman.
49.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2004). Intergroup contact and the central role of affect in intergroup prejudice. In TiedensL.LeachC. W. (Eds.), The social life of emotion: Studies in emotion and social interaction (pp. 246–269). Cambridge University Press.
50.
TsumaW.PentoriC.MashikoM. (2014). Local peace committees: Building social cohesion and resilience within the infrastructure for peace framework. Conflict Trends, 2014(3), 45–50.
51.
WagnerU.HewstoneM. (2012). Intergroup contact. In TroppL. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 193–209). Oxford University Press.
52.
WhiteheadJ.McNiffJ. (2006). Action research: Living theory. Sage.
ZimutoP. (2020). Developing and testing new interventions to prevent violent service delivery protests in South Africa[Doctoral dissertation]. Durban University of Technology.
55.
ZvobgoT. C. (2016). A comparative study into the effectiveness of business rescue strategies in South Africa and the judicial management system in Zimbabwe(Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
