The purpose of this study was to elicit the experiences of women who participated in a gender-responsive program in jail. Through the collection of life history interviews, this article highlights the transformative learning experiences of 13 women participants. Research questions included (1) how did the program foster transformative learning? (2) What effect did the program have on participants’ thinking, feeling, and behavior? Despite the highly regimented and regulated jail context—an environment where the women’s bodies are literally imprisoned—the results indicate the holistic programming and learning environment served as an emancipatory context in which transformation could occur through interpersonal and intrapersonal engagement. The results of this study also reveal the need for more and targeted advocacy and education for incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women.
BurkeA. C. (2002). Triple jeopardy: Women marginalized by substance abuse, poverty and incarceration. In Figueira-McDonoughJ.SarriR. C. (Eds.), Women at the margins: Neglect, punishment, and resistance (pp. 175–201). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
4.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Chesney-LindM.PaskoL. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CovingtonS. S.BloomB. E. (2006). Gender responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. Women & Therapy, 29, 9–33. doi:10.1300/J015v29n03_02
7.
CrantonP. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
CrantonP.CarusettaE. (2004). Perspectives on authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 55, 5–22. doi:10.1177/0741713604268894
9.
CrantonP.TaylorE. W. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking more unified theory. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP., & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CrenshawK. W. (2012). From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1418–1472.
11.
DirkxJ. M. (2012). Self-formation and transformative learning: A response to “Calling transformative learning into question: Some mutinous thoughts,” by Michael Newman. Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 399–405. doi:10.1177/0741713612456420
12.
EnglishL. M.IrvingC. J. (2012). Women and transformative learning. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP., & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 245–259). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
14.
GendreauP.RossR. R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349–408. doi:10.1080/07418828700089411
15.
HallM. T.GolderS.ConleyC. L.SawningS. (2013). Designing programming and interventions for women in the criminal justice system. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 27–50. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9158-2
16.
HirschA. E. (2004). Bringing back shame: Women, welfare reform, and criminal justice. In SchramP. J.Koons-WittB. (Eds.), Gendered (in) justice: Theory and practice in feminist criminology (pp. 270–286). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
17.
HoaglandM. A. (2000). Fostering transformative learning in group programs for abused women(Unpublished master’s thesis). St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.
18.
LawrenceR. L. (2008). Powerful feelings: Exploring the affective domain of arts-based and informal learning. In DirkxJ. M. (Ed.), Adult learning and the emotional self (pp. 65–77). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no. 120. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
LawrenceR. L. (2012). Transformative learning through artistic expression: Getting out of our heads. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP., & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 471–485). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
LiptonD.PearsonF.ClelandC.YeeD. (2002). The effects of therapeutic communities and milieu therapy on recidivism. Meta-analytic findings from the correctional drug abuse treatment effectiveness (CCDATE) study. In McGuireJ. (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending (pp. 39–77). New York, NY: John Wiley.
21.
McDaniels-WilsonC.BelknapJ. (2008). The extensive sexual violation and sexual abuse histories of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 14, 1090–1127. doi:10.1177/1077801208323160
22.
MerriamB. (1998). To find a voice: Art therapy in a women’s prison. Women & Therapy, 21, 157–171. doi:10.1300/J015v21n01_04
23.
MessinaN.GrellaC. E.CartierJ.TorresS. (2010). A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 97–107. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.09.004
24.
MezirowJ. (Ed.). (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory-in-progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
MountfordM. (2005). The journey toward transformational learning in a statewide doctoral program. Innovative Higher Education, 30, 213–227. doi:10.1007/s10755-005-6305-4
26.
NajavitsL. M. (2002). Seeking safety: A treatment manual for PTSD and substance abuse. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
27.
NewmanM. (2012). Calling transformative learning into question: Some mutinous thoughts. Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 36–55. doi:13610392768
28.
SabolW. J.CoutureH. (2008). Prison inmates at midyear 2007. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin(NCJ No 221944). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
29.
TaylorE. W. (2000). Fostering Mezirow’s transformative learning theory in the adult education classroom: A critical review. The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 14, 1–28.
30.
TaylorE. W.DuveskogD.Friis-HansenE. (2012). Fostering transformative learning in non-formal settings: Farmer-Field schools in East Africa. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31, 725–742. doi:10.1080/02601370.2012.713035
WhiteG. D. (2012). Gender-responsive programs in U.S. prisons: Implications for change. Social Work in Public Health, 27, 283–300. doi:10.1080/19371918.2012.629875
33.
WrightE. M.Van VoorhisP.SalisburyE. J.BaumanA. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1612–1632. doi:10.1177/0093854812451088
YorksL.KaslE. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 4, 43–64. doi:10.1177/1541344605283151
