Two-Level,Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Single Factor SAVRY Individual/Clinical Risk Measure Across Mississippi Juvenile Court Jurisdictions

Abstract

The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), widely used to assess risk and protective factors among justice-involved youth, demonstrates predictive validity with regard to recidivism. At the individual level, the dynamic Individual/Clinical Risk Factor of the SAVRY has previously demonstrated consistent form across gender and race among Mississippi justice-involved youth. Little is known about the factor structure of the Individual/Clinical Risk Factor at the agency level. This study explored a two-level, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the Individual/Clinical Risk measure across 72 Mississippi judicial jurisdictions over a six-year period (2016–2021) involving n = 2,124 delinquent youth. Probit regression analysis examined the relationship of the CFA factor results to within-level and between-level covariates. Findings support the existence of a single factor of Individual/Clinical Risk across the vast majority (88%) of court jurisdictions. The results support the continued use of the SAVRY as an evidence-based measure of risk.

Keywords

SAVRY risk factors delinquency juvenile justice adolescence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alavi

Visentin

D. C.

Thapa

D. K.

Hunt

G. E.

Watson

Cleary

(2020). Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Advances in Nursing, 76(9), 2209–2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14399

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362

Andrews

D. A.

Zinger

Hoge

R. D.

Bonta

Gendreau

Cullen

F. T.

(1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta‐analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x

Baglivio

M. T.

Wolff

K. T.

Jackowski

Greenwald

M. A.

(2017). A multilevel examination of risk/need change scores, community context, and successful reentry of committed juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204015596052

Barboni

von Hagan

Piñeyro

Senabre

(2023). Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY) on the recidivism of juvenile offenders: A systematic review. Psychology, Crime & Law, 30(10), 1508–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2214661

Bentler

P. M.

(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Blalock

H. M.

(1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bollen

K. A.

(1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.

Bonta

Wormith

S. J.

(2007). Risk and need assessment. In McIvor

Raynor

(Eds.), Developments in social work with offenders (pp. 131–152). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

10.

Borum

Bartel

Forth

A. E.

(2006). SAVRY, structured assessment of violence risk in youth: Professional manual. Incorporated. Psychological Assessment Resources.

11.

Borum

Lodewijks

Bartel

P. A.

Forth

(2010). Structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). In Otto

R. K.

Douglas

K. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 63–80). Routledge.

12.

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

13.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445–455). Sage.

14.

Bursick

R. J.

Grasmick

H. G.

(1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington Books.

15.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5

16.

Childs

K. K.

Frick

P. J.

(2016). Age differences in the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2016.1152618

17.

Childs

K. K.

Frick

P. J.

Gottlieb

(2016). Sex differences in the measurement invariance and factors that influence structured judgments of risk using the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014547722

18.

Childs

K. K.

Ryals

Frick

P. J.

Lawing

Phillippi

S. W.

Deprato

D. K.

(2013). Examining the validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2060

19.

Cohn

J. R.

Perrault

R. T.

Cicero

D. C.

Vincent

G. M.

(2024). The structured assessment of violence risk in youth demonstrated measurement invariance between black and white justice-referred youths. Law and human behavior. Law Human Behavior, 48(5–6), 415–426. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000586

20.

Dembo

Gardner

S. K.

Robertson

A. A.

Wareham

Schmeidler

(2024). Longitudinal cohort study: Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth individual/clinical risk factor on recidivism among Mississippi justice-involved youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 22(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040241231964

21.

Dembo

Gardner

S. K.

Robertson

A. A.

Wareham

Schmeidler

(2024). SAVRY predictive validity of Mississippi justice-involved youth recidivism: A latent variable approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 49(5), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-024-09766-8

22.

Development Services Group, Inc. (2015). Risk/Needs assessment for youths. Literature review. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/RiskandNeeds.pdf

23.

Dimitrov

D. M.

(2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459

24.

Dolan

M. C.

Rennie

C. E.

(2008). The structured assessment of violence risk in youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with conduct disorder. Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.35

25.

Gammelgård

Koivisto

A. M.

Eronen

Kaltiala-Heino

(2008). The predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY) among institutionalized adolescents. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 19(3), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940802114475

26.

Gammelgård

Koivisto

A. M.

Eronen

Kaltiala-Heino

(2015). Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 25(3), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1921

27.

Goodwin

Brown

S. L.

Skilling

T. A.

(2022). Gender differences in the prevalence and predictive validity of protective factors in a sample of justice-involved youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 20(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040221089235

28.

Hayes-Smith

(2009). Race, racial context, and withholding adjudication in drug cases: A multilevel examination of juvenile justice. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 7(3), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377930903140300

29.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

30.

IBM Corp . (2021). SPSS statistics for windows (version 28.0). Computer Software. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics?utm_content=SRCWW&p1=Search&p4=43700068092265913&p5=p&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIq4_LvtW2gAMVjxGzAB1MpQEAEAAYASACEgLi3_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

31.

Jöreskog

K. G.

Sörbom

(1999). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide (2nd ed.). Scientific Software International.

32.

Juvenile Justice Geography, Policy, Practice & Statistics . (2020). Evidence-based Practices. National center for juvenile justice (NCJJ). https://www.jjgps.org/juvenile-justice-services

33.

Kleeven

A. T. H.

de Vries Robbé

Mulder

E. A.

Popma

(2022). Risk assessment in juvenile and young adult offenders: Predictive validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV. Assessment, 29(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120959740

34.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

35.

Koh

L. L.

Day

Klettke

Daffern

Chu

C. M.

(2020). The predictive validity of youth violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review. Psychology, Crime and Law, 26(8), 776–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2020.1734200

36.

Kraemer

H. C.

Kazdin

A. E.

Offord

D. R.

Kessler

R. C.

Jensen

P. S.

Kupfer

D. J.

(1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(4), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160065009

37.

Lawing

Childs

K. K.

Frick

P. J.

Vincent

(2017). Use of structured professional judgment by probation officers to assess risk for recidivism in adolescent offenders. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000414

38.

Leiber

M. J.

Donnelly

E. A.

(2021). What context matters and at what level? A test of racial/ethnic threat, symbolic threat, and structural inequality perspectives in juvenile court decision-making. Crime & Delinquency, 67(2), 234–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720938344

39.

Hein

Cavitt

Chapman

Foley Geib

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2023). Applying item response theory analysis to the SAVRY in justice-involved youth. Assessment, 30(8), 2373–2386. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221146120

40.

S. M. Y.

Viljoen

Christiansen

A. K.

Muir

N. M.

(2020). Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY) among a sample of Asian Canadian youth on probation. Law and Human Behavior, 44(6), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000431

41.

Liska

(1992). Social threat and social control. SUNY Press.

42.

Lodewijks

H. B.

de Ruiter

Doreleijers

T. H.

(2008). Gender differences in violent outcome and risk assessment in adolescent offenders after residential treatment. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2008.9914410

43.

Lodewijks

H. P. B.

Doreleijers

T. A. H.

de Ruiter

(2008). SAVRY risk assessment in violent Dutch adolescents: Relation to sentencing and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(6), 696–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808316146

44.

Maas

C. J.

Hox

J. J.

(2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, 58(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00252.x

45.

Maas

C. J.

Hox

J. J.

(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.85

46.

Meyers

J. R.

Schmidt

(2008). Predictive validity of the structured assessment for violence risk in youth (SAVRY) with juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(3), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807311972

47.

Moffitt

T. E.

(1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674

48.

Muir

N. M.

Viljoen

J. L.

Jonnson

M. R.

Cochrane

D. M.

Rogers

B. J.

(2020). Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY) with Indigenous and Caucasian female and Male adolescents on probation. Psychological Assessment, 32(6), 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000816

49.

Mulvey

E. P.

(2005). Risk assessment in juvenile justice policy and practice. In Heilbrun

Goldstein

N. E. S.

Redding

R. E.

(Eds.), Juvenile delinquency: Prevention, assessment, and intervention (pp. 209–231). Oxford University Press.

50.

Muthén

B. O.

Muthén

L. K.

(1998-2018). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Muthén & Muthén.

51.

National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) . (2014). NCCD compares juvenile justice risk assessment instruments: A summary of the OJJDP-Funded study. NCCD. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/nccd-compares-juvenile-justice-risk-assessment-instruments-summary

52.

National Research Council . (2013). Reforming juvenile justice: A developmental approach. National Academies Press.

53.

Onifade

Petersen

Bynum

T. S.

Davidson

W. S.

(2011). Multilevel recidivism prediction: Incorporating neighborhood socioeconomic ecology in juvenile justice risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(8), 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811407026

54.

Penney

S. R.

Lee

Moretti

M. M.

(2010). Gender differences in risk factors for violence: An examination of the predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth. Aggressive Behavior, 36(6), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20352

55.

Perrault

R. T.

Vincent

G. M.

Guy

L. S.

(2017). Are risk assessments racially biased? Field study of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in probation. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000445

56.

Robertson

A. A.

Fang

Weiland

Joe

Gardner

Dembo

McReynolds

Dickson

Pankow

Dennis

Elkington

(2020). Recidivism among justice-involved youth: Findings from JJ-TRIALS. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(9), 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820922891

57.

Rodriguez

(2007). Juvenile court context and detention decisions: Reconsidering the role of race, ethnicity, and community characteristics in juvenile court processes. Justice Quarterly, 24(4), 629–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701717144

58.

Rodriguez

(2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810365905

59.

Sampson

R. J.

Groves

W. B.

(1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068

60.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law & Society Review, 27(2), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053938

61.

Schmidt

Campbell

M. A.

Houlding

(2011). Comparative analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in adolescent offenders: A 10-year follow-up into adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204010371793

62.

Schwalbe

C. S.

Cutler

(2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31(5), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9071-7

63.

Shaw

C. D.

McKay

H. D.

(1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press.

64.

Shepherd

S. M.

Luebbers

Ogloff

J. R.

Fullam

Dolan

(2014). The predictive validity of risk assessment approaches for young Australian offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(5), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.904262

65.

Snijders

T. A. B.

(2005). Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In Everitt

B. S.

Howell

D. C.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (3, pp. 1570–1573). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa492

66.

Tittle

C. R.

Curran

D. A.

(1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67(1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579099

67.

Tucker

L. R.

Lewis

(1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291170

68.

Vincent

G. M.

Chapman

Cook

N. E.

(2011). Risk-needs assessment in juvenile justice: Predictive validity of the SAVRY, racial differences, and the contribution of needs factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810386000

69.

Vincent

G. M.

Guy

L. S.

Grisso

(2012). Risk assessment in juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. Models for Change: Systems Reform in Juvenile Justice. https://modelsforchange.net/publications/346/Risk_Assessment_in_Juvenile_Justice_A_Guidebook_for_Implementation.pdf

70.

Welsh

J. L.

Schmidt

McKinnon

Chattha

H. K.

Meyers

J. R.

(2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107307966

71.

West

S. G.

Taylor

A. B.

(2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In Hoyle

R. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). The Guilford Press.

72.

Wilson

W. J.

(1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. University of Chicago Press.

73.

Woods

S. P.

(2013). Predictive validity of the SAVRY within a diverse population of juvenile offenders. Roger Williams University. [Unpublished master’s thesis].