This work uses social learning theory’s perspective on continuation and cessation of offending to explore the how rewards and punishments for violence change across the stages of gang membership. Qualitative interviews with a racially/ethnically diverse sample of 39 former gang members within two emergent gang cities in the American south are used to explore the role of violence across the stages of gang affiliation. Inductive analytic techniques are used to analyze gang members’ in-depth, semi-structured interviews to identify and further refine emergent themes through the use of modified ground theory. Results indicate that violence is expressed as central to the experiences of youth gang members across the life cycle of gang involvement and alters former members’ perceptions of the gang’s ability to provide a protective function. The extent to which the role of violence changes over time—as it interacts with youth decision-making specific to the balance of experienced and anticipated rewards and punishments of gang involvement—is integral in understanding its reinforcing effect on gang membership and association.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
2.
AkersR. L.JensenG. F. (2008). The empirical status of social learning theory of crime and deviance: The past, present, and future. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. Transaction Publishers.
3.
AlleyneE.FernandesI.PritchardE. (2014). Denying humanness to victims: How gang members justify violent behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(6), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214536064
4.
AugustynM. B.McGloinJ. M.PyroozD. C. (2016). Does gang membership pay? Illegal and legal earnings through emerging adulthood. Criminology, 57(3), 452–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12208
5.
BjerregaardB.LizotteA. J. (1995). Gun ownership and gang membership. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(1), 37–58, https://doi.org/10.2307/1143999
CarsonD. C.PetersonD.EsbensenF.-A. (2013). Youth gang desistance: An examination of the effect of different operational definitions of desistance on the motivations, methods, and consequences associated with leaving the gang. Criminal Justice Review, 38(4), 510–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016813511634
9.
CarsonD. C.VecchioJ. M. (2015). Leaving the gang: A review and thoughts on future research. In DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 257–275). Wiley.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
DeckerS. H.LauritsenJ. L. (2002). Leaving the gang. In HuffC. R. (Ed.), Gangs in America (3rd ed., pp. 51–67). Sage Publications.
14.
DeckerS. H.Van WinkleB. (1996). Life in the gang: Family, friends, and violence. Cambridge University Press.
15.
Della PortaD. (2009). Leaving underground organizations. In BjorgoT.HorganJ. (Eds.), Leaving terrorism behind: Individual and collective disengagement (pp. 66–87). Routledge.
16.
DensleyJ. A. (2015). Joining the gang: A process of supply and demand. In DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 235–256). Wiley.
17.
DongB.KrohnM. D. (2016). Dual trajectories of gang affiliation and delinquent peer association during adolescence: An examination of long-term offending outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(4), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0417-2
EsbensenF.-A.OsgoodD. W.PetersonD.TaylorT. J.CarsonD. C. (2013). Short- and long-term outcome results from a multisite evaluation of the G.R.E.A.T. program. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(3), 375–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12048
20.
EsbensenF.-A.WinfreeC L. T. (1998). Race and gender differences between gang and nongang youths: Results from a multisite survey. Justice Quarterly, 15(3), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829800093861
21.
EsbensenF.-A.WinfreeL. T. (2013). Motivations for gang joining: Does context matter? In BoersK.FeltesT.KinzigJ.ShermanL. W.StrengF. (Eds.), Festscrift for hans Kerner (pp. 77–90). Mohr Publishing.
22.
FoxK. A.LaneJ.AkersR. L. (2013). Understanding gang membership and crime victimization among jail inmates: A test of self-control theory. Crime & Delinquency, 59(5), 764–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710392003
23.
GiordanoP. C.SchroederR. D.CernkovichS. A. (2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-median perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1603–1661. https://doi.org/10.1086/512710
24.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
25.
HowellJ. C.EgleyA.Jr.TitaG.GriffithsE. (2011). U.S. Gang problem trends and seriousness, 1996-2009. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
LaugerT. R. (2012). Real Gangstas: Legitimacy, reputation, and violence in the intergang environment. Rutgers University Press.
31.
MatsudaK. N.MeldeC.TaylorT. J.FrengA.EsbensenF.-A. (2013). Gang membership and adherence to the “code of the street”. Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 440–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.684432
32.
MaxsonC. L. (1993). Investigating gang migration: Contextual issues for intervention. Gang Journal, 1, 1–18.
33.
MaxsonC. L.KleinM. (1995). Investigating gang structures. Journal of Gang Research, 3, 33–40.
34.
McGloinJ. M.CollinsM. E. (2015). Micro-level processes of the gang. In DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 276–293). Wiley.
35.
MeldeC.EsbensenF.-A. (2013). Gangs and violence: Disentangling the impact of gang membership on the level and nature of offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9164-z
36.
MeldeC.TaylorT. J.EsbensenF.-A. (2009). 'I got your back': An examination of the protective function of gang membership in adolescence. Criminology, 47(2), 565–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00148.x
37.
MeldeC.WeermanF. M. (Eds.). (2020). Gangs in the era of internet and social media. Springer.
38.
MillerJ. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs, and gender. Oxford University Press.
39.
MillerJ. (2005). The status of qualitative research in criminology. In LamontM.WhiteP. (Eds.), Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research: Cultural anthropology, law and social science, political science, and sociology programs (pp. 69–75). National Science Foundation.
40.
MillerJ. (2011). Grounding the analysis of gender and crime: Accomplishing and interpreting qualitative interview research. In GaddD.KarsteftS.MessnerS. F. (Eds.), The sage handbook of criminological research methods. Sage.
41.
MillerJ.GlassnerB. (2011). The "inside" and the "outside": Finding realities in interviews. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (3rd ed., pp. 99–112). Sage.
42.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. (2009). Desistance and the "feared self": Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 99, 1103–1156. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20685067
43.
PyroozD. C. (2014). “From your first cigarette to your last dyin’ day”: The patterning of gang membership in the life-course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(2), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-013-9206-1
44.
PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H. (2011). Motives and methods for leaving the gang: Understanding the process of gang desistance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.07.001
45.
PyroozD. C.DensleyJ. A. (2016). Selection into street gangs: Signaling theory, gang membership, and criminal offending. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(4), 447–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815619462
46.
ReesC.WinfreeL. T. (2017). Social learner decision making: Matching theory as a unifying framework for recasting a general theory. In BernascoW.van GelderJ.-L.ElffersH. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of offender decision making (pp. 268–300). Oxford University Press.
47.
RomanC. G.DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (2017). Leveraging the pushes and pulls of gang disengagement to improve gang intervention: Findings from three multi-site studies and a review of relevant gang problems. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(3), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2017.1345096
TaylorT. J.PetersonD.EsbensenF.-A.FrengA. (2007). Gang membership as a risk factor for adolescent violent victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(4), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807305845
50.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.Chad-WiershemD. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001005
51.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SmithC. A.TobinK. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. Cambridge.
52.
VigilJ. D. (1988). Barrio gangs: Street life and identity in Southern California. University of Texas Press.
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press.
55.
WeaverB. (2016). Offending and desistance: The importance of social relations. Routledge.
56.
WeinerC. (2007). Making teams work in conducting grounded theory. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 293–310). Sage.
57.
WinfreeL. T.FrengA. (2015). Gangs and social learning theory: What we know, what we need to know, and why it matters. In DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 118–135). Wiley.
58.
WinfreeL. T.Vigil-BackstromT.MaysG. L. (1994). Social learning theory, self-reported delinquency, and youth gangs: A new twist on a general theory of crime and delinquency. Youth & Society, 26(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X94026002001
59.
WooD.GilesH.HoggM. A.GoldmanL. (2015). Social pyschology of gangs: An intergroup communication perspective. In DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 136–156). Wiley.
