There are hundreds of thousands of juvenile gang members in the United States who are at heightened risk of criminal offending, violent victimization, and incarceration. Importantly, however, incarceration in itself is a lifelong risk factor for negative social outcomes. That said, little is known about the effects of gang membership on the sentencing outcomes of juvenile offenders. The primary research question of the current study is: How does self-reported gang membership influence the likelihood of incarceration relative to similarly situated non-gang-involved juvenile defendants? To address this question, the current study uses data obtained from the Pathways to Desistance study. In a sample of 1,067 serious adolescent offenders drawn from Wave I, results show that gang affiliation is a significant predictor of incarceration. This finding was consistent across the two study sites (Phoenix, AZ, and Philadelphia, PA), ultimately providing support for a “gang penalty” in juvenile sentencing outcomes. The implications for future research, juvenile justice policy, and youth development are discussed.
AbramsL. S.TerryD. (2017). Everyday desistance: The transition to adulthood among formerly incarcerated youth. Rutgers University Press.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266.
3.
BarrowsJ.HuffC. R. (2009). Gangs and public policy: Constructing and deconstructing gang databases. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(4), 675–703.
4.
BattinS. R.HillK. G.AbbottR. D.CatalanoR. F. (1998). Contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. The Criminology, 36, 93–115.
5.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41(4), 1287–1318.
6.
BishopD. M.LeiberM.JohnsonJ. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(3), 213–233.
7.
BjerregaardB.SmithC. (1993). Gender differences in gang participation, delinquency, and substance use. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(4), 329–355.
8.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.
9.
CauffmanE.PiqueroA. R.KimonisE.SteinbergL.ChassinL.FaganJ. (2007). Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 31(6), 519–535.
10.
CraigW. M.VitaroF.GagnonL.TremblayR. E. (2002). The road to gang membership: Characteristics of male gang and nongang members from ages 10 to 14. Social Development, 11(1), 53–68.
11.
CurryG. D. (2000). Self-reported gang involvement and officially recorded delinquency. Criminology, 38(4), 1253–1274.
12.
CurryG. D.DeckerS. H.EgleyA.Jr (2002). Gang involvement and delinquency in a middle school population. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 275–292.
13.
DavisM. S.FlanneryD. J. (2001). The institutional treatment of gang members. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 37–46.
14.
EgleyA.JrHowellJ. C.HarrisM. (2014). Highlights from the 2012 NationalYouth Gang Survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Programs.
15.
EitleD.GunkelS.Van GundyK. (2004). Cumulative exposure to stressful life events and male gang membership. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(2), 95–111.
16.
EsbensenF. A.HuizingaD.WeiherA. W. (1993). Gang and non-gang youth: Differences in explanatory factors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9(2), 94–116.
17.
FaderJ. J. (2013). Falling back: Incarceration and transitions to adulthood among urban youth. Rutgers University Press.
18.
FaderJ. J.KurlychekM. C.MorganK. A. (2014). The color of juvenile justice: Racial disparities in dispositional decisions. Social Science Research, 44, 126–140.
19.
FaganJ. (1990). Social processes of delinquency and drug use among urban gangs. Gangs in America. SAGE.
20.
FeldB. C. (1991). The transformation of the juvenile court. Minnesota Law Review, 75, 691–725.
21.
FeldB. C. (1993). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. Crime and Justice, 17, 197–280.
22.
FeldB. C. (1997). Abolish the juvenile court: Youthfulness, criminal responsibility, and sentencing policy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 68–136.
23.
FeldB. C. (2002). Race, politics, and juvenile justice: The warren court and the conservative backlash. Minnesota Law Review, 87, 1447–1577.
24.
FeldB. C. (2003). The politics of race and juvenile justice: The “due process revolution” and the conservative reaction. Justice Quarterly, 20(4), 765–800.
25.
FeldB. C. (2006). Juveniles’ competence to exercise Miranda rights: An empirical study of policy and practice. Minnesota Law Review, 91, 26.
26.
FeldB. C. (2007). A century of juvenile justice: A work in progress or a revolution that failed. Northern Kentucky. Law Review, 34, 189.
27.
FeldB. C. (2013). The youth discount: Old enough to do the crime, too young to do the time. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 107–148.
28.
FeldB. C. (2017). My life in crime: An intellectual history of the juvenile court. Nevada Law Journal, 17, 299–330.
29.
GaarderE.RodriguezN.ZatzM. S. (2004). Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers’ views of girls. Justice Quarterly, 21(3), 547–578.
30.
GilmanA. B.HillK. G.HawkinsJ. D. (2015). When is a youth’s debt to society paid? Examining the long-term consequences of juvenile incarceration for adult functioning. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(1), 33–47.
31.
GordonR. A.LaheyB. B.KawaiE.LoeberR.Stouthamer-LoeberM.FarringtonD. P. (2004). Antisocial behavior and youth gang membership: Selection and socialization. Criminology, 42(1), 55–88.
32.
HarrisA. (2008). The social construction of “sophisticated” adolescents: How judges integrate juvenile and criminal justice decision-making models. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(4), 469–506.
33.
HarrisA. (2009). Attributions and institutional processing: How focal concerns guide decision-making in the juvenile court. Race and Social Problems, 1(4), 243–256.
34.
HavilandA.NaginD. S.RosenbaumP. R. (2007). Combining propensity score matching and group-based trajectory analysis in an observational study. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 247–267.
35.
HillK. G.HowellJ. C.HawkinsJ. D.Battin-PearsonS. R. (1999). Childhood risk factors for adolescent gang membership: Results from the Seattle social development project. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(3), 300–322.
36.
HolleranD.SpohnC. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42(1), 211–240.
37.
HowellJ. C.EgleyA. (2005). Moving risk factors into developmental theories of gang membership. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3(4), 334–354.
38.
JohnsonB. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge-and county-level influences. Criminology, 44(2), 259–298.
39.
KatzC. M.MaguireE. R.RoncekD. W. (2002). The creation of specialized police gang units: A macro-level analysis of contingency, social threat and resource dependency explanations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 25(3), 472–506.
40.
KennedyD. M. (2019). Response to “what works with gangs: A breakthrough”. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(1), E1–E4.
41.
KimH.WildemanC.Jonson-ReidM.DrakeB. (2017). Lifetime prevalence of investigating child maltreatment among US children. American Journal of Public Health, 107 (2), 274–281.
42.
KleinM. W. (1996). What are street gangs when they get to court?Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 515–521.
43.
KrohnM. D.WardJ. T.ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.ChuR. (2011). The cascading effects of adolescent gang involvement across the life course. Criminology, 49(4), 991–1028.
44.
LaheyB. B.GordonR. A.LoeberR.Stouthamer-LoeberM.FarringtonD. P. (1999). Boys who join gangs: A prospective study of predictors of first gang entry. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(4), 261–276.
45.
LambieI.RandellI. (2013). The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(3), 448–459.
46.
LashD. (2017). “When the welfare people come”: Race and class in the US child protection system. Haymarket Books.
47.
LeeT. (2016). Catching a case: Inequality and fear in New York City’s child welfare system. Rutgers University Press.
48.
LindseyE. (1914). The juvenile court movement from a lawyer’s standpoint. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 52, 140–148.
49.
LoweryP. G.BurrowJ. D.KaminskiR. J. (2018). A multilevel test of the racial threat hypothesis in one state’s juvenile court. Crime & Delinquency, 64(1), 53–87.
50.
MaxsonC. L.HenniganK. M.SloaneD. C. (2005). “It’s getting crazy out there”: Can a civil gang injunction change a community?Criminology and Public Policy, 4(3), 577–605.
51.
MaxsonC. L.MatsudaK. N.HenniganK. (2011). “Deterrability” among gang and nongang juvenile offenders: Are gang members more (or less) deterrable than other juvenile offenders?Crime & Delinquency, 57(4), 516–543.
52.
MeldeC.EsbensenF. A. (2011). Gang membership as a turning point in the life course. Criminology, 49(2), 513–552.
53.
MietheT. D.McCorkleR. C. (1997). Gang membership and criminal processing: A test of the “master status” concept. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 407–427.
54.
MouleR. K.DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (2013). Social capital, the life-course, and gangs. In GibsonC.KrohnM. (Eds.), Handbook of life-course criminology (pp. 143–158). Springer.
55.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.
56.
PetersonD.TaylorT. J.EsbensenF. A. (2004). Gang membership and violent victimization. Justice Quarterly, 21(4), 793–815.
57.
PyroozD. C. (2014). “From your first cigarette to your last Dyin’ day”: The patterning of gang membership in the life-course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(2), 349–372.
58.
PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H. (2019). Competing for control: Gangs and the social order of prisons. Cambridge University Press.
59.
PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H.OwensE. (2019). Do prison administrative and survey data sources tell the same story? A multi-trait, multi-method examination with application to gangs. Crime & Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719879017
60.
PyroozD. C.GartnerN.SmithM. (2017). Consequences of incarceration for gang membership: A longitudinal study of serious offenders in Philadelphia and phoenix. Criminology, 55(2), 273–306.
61.
PyroozD. C.MouleR. K.JrDeckerS. H. (2014). The contribution of gang membership to the victim–offender overlap. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(3), 315–348.
62.
PyroozD. C.SweetenG. (2015). Gang membership between ages 5 and 17 years in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(4), 414–419.
63.
PyroozD. C.TuranovicJ. J.DeckerS. H.WuJ. (2016). Taking stock of the relationship between gang membership and offending: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 365–397.
64.
PyroozD. C.WolfeS. E.SpohnC. (2011). Gang-related homicide charging decisions: The implementation of a specialized prosecution unit in Los Angeles. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(1), 3–26.
65.
RayR. (2017). The making of a teenage service class: Poverty and mobility in an American city. University of California Press.
66.
SamuelsG. M.PryceJ. M. (2008). “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”: Survivalist self-reliance as resilience and risk among young adults aging out of foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(10), 1198–1210.
67.
SchubertC. A.MulveyE. P.SteinbergL.CauffmanE.LosoyaS. H.HeckerT.ChassinL.KnightG. P. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 237–255.
68.
ShiremanJ. F. (2003). Critical issues in child protection. Columbia University Press.
69.
SilvaJ. M. (2013). Coming up short: Working-class adulthood in an age of uncertainty. Oxford.
70.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.
73.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.
74.
SutherlandE. H. (1939). Principles of criminology (3rd ed.). J. B. Lippincott Company.
75.
TanenhausD. S. (2012). The elusive juvenile court, its origins, practices, and reinventions. In FeldB. C.BishopD. M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice (pp. 419–441). Oxford University Press.
76.
TaylorT. J. (2008). The boulevard ain’t safe for your kids…1: Youth gang membership and violent victimization. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(2), 125–136.
77.
TaylorT. J.FrengA.EsbensenF. A.PetersonD. (2008). Youth gang membership and serious violent victimization: The importance of lifestyles and routine activities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(10):1441–1464.
78.
TaylorT. J.PetersonD.EsbensenF. A.FrengA. (2007). Gang membership as a risk factor for adolescent violent victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(4), 351–380.
79.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.Chard-WierschemD. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 55–87.
80.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SmithC. A.TobinK. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. Cambridge University Press.
81.
Van SmedenM.MoonsK. G.de GrootJ. A.CollinsG. S.AltmanD. G.EijkemansM. J.ReitsmaJ. B. (2019). Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 28(8), 2455–2474.
82.
Walker-BarnesC. J.MasonC. A. (2004). Delinquency and substance use among gang-involved youth: The moderating role of parenting practices. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3-4), 235–250.
83.
WhiteC. (2019). Treatment services in the juvenile justice system: Examining the use and funding of services by youth on probation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(1), 62–87.
84.
ZatzM. S. (1985). Los Cholos: Legal processing of Chicano gang members. Social Problems, 33(1), 13–30.
85.
ZimringF. E. (2014). The changing legal world of adolescence (2nd ed.). Quid Pro Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
