Elijah Anderson’s ‘‘code of the streets’’ has received considerable attention as a promising approach to understanding youths violence. One area which has received scant attention, however, is the measurement quality of the street code concept. Using data collected from more than 3,300 middle school youths residing in seven geographically and demographically diverse U.S. cities between 2007 and 2009, the authors seek to answer the following questions: (a) What are the psychometric properties of the attitudes toward street code-related violence scale (in terms of dimensionality and internal consistency) across demographic subgroups (i.e., race/ethnicity, sex, and age groups) and social contexts (i.e., cities)? and (b) To what extent does the level of acceptance of the attitudes associated with street code-related violence vary across demographic subgroups and social contexts? Results illustrate that the scale performs similarly across groups and contexts, but the actual level of acceptance of street code-related violence varies considerably.
Anderson, E. ( 1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community . University of Chicago Press.
2.
Anderson, E. ( 1994). The code of the streets. The Atlantic Monthly, 273, 80-94.
3.
Anderson, E. ( 1999). Code of the streets: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.
4.
Babbie, E.R. ( 1979). The practice of social research (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
5.
Baumer, E., Horney, J., Felson, R., & Lauritsen, J.L. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage and the nature of violence. Criminology, 41, 39-72.
6.
Brezina, T., Agnew, R., Cullen, F.T., & Wright, J.P. ( 2004). The code of the street: A quantitative assessment of Elijah Anderson’s subculture of violence thesis and its contribution to youth violence research. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 2, 303-328.
7.
Bursik, R.J. ( 2009). The Dead Sea Scrolls and criminological knowledge: 2008 Presidential address to the American Society of Criminology. Criminology, 47, 5-16.
8.
Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A. ( 1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
9.
Clear, T.R., & Frost, N.A. ( 2001). Criminology & Public Policy: A new journal of the American Society of Criminology. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 1-4.
10.
Comrey, A.L., & Lee, H.B. ( 1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
11.
Cronbach, L.J. ( 1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests . Psychometrika, 16, 297-333.
12.
DeVellis, R.F. ( 1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
13.
Elliott, D.S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S.S. ( 1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
14.
Esbensen, F.- A., Melde, C., Taylor, T.J., & Peterson, D. ( 2008). Active parental consent in school-based research: How much is enough and how do we get it? Evaluation Review, 32, 335-362.
15.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine .
16.
Kaiser, H.F. ( 1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis . Educational & Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
17.
Kolbrin, S. ( 1951). The conflict of values in delinquency areas. American Sociological Review, 16, 653-661.
Morris, G.D., Wood, P.B., & Dunaway, R.G. ( 2007a). Traditionalism or low self-control? Explaining the health-risk behaviors of American Indian youth. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 194-218.
20.
Morris, G.D., Wood, P.B., & Dunaway, R.G. ( 2007b). Testing the cultural invariance of parenting and self-control as predictors of American Indian delinquency. Western Criminology Review, 8, 32-47.
21.
National Youth Gang Center. (2006). Retrieved on February 3, 2009 from http://www.iir.com/nygc/
22.
Norusis, M. ( 2009). SPSS 17.0 guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Osgood, D.W. ( 1998). Interdisciplinary integration: Building criminology by stealing from our friends. The Criminologist, 23, 13-4,41.
24.
Pridemore, W.A. ( 2004). Review of the literature on risk and protective factors of offending among Native Americans. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2, 45-63.
25.
Reynolds, P.D. ( 1971). A primer in theory construction. New York: Macmillan.
26.
Rich, J.A., & Grey, C.M. ( 2005). Pathways to recurrent trauma among young Black men: Traumatic stress, substance abuse, and the ‘code of the street. ’ American Journal of Public Health, 95, 816-824.
27.
Stewart, E.A., Schreck, C.J., & Brunson, R.K. ( 2008). Lessons of the street code: Policy implications for reducing violent victimization among disadvantaged citizens. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 137-147.
28.
Stewart, E.A., Schreck, C.J., & Simons, R.L. ( 2006). ‘‘I ain’t gonna let no one disrespect me’’: Does the code of the street increase or decrease violent victimization among African American adolescents?Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 43, 427-458.
29.
Stewart, E.A., & Simons, R.L. ( 2006). Structure and culture in African-American adolescent violence: A partial test of the code of the street thesis. Justice Quarterly, 23, 1-33.
30.
Stewart, E.A., & Simons, R.L. ( 2009). The code of the street and African-American adolescent violence. NIJ Research in Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved on February 3, 2009, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/223509.pdf
Wallace, W. ( 1971). The logic of science in sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: AldineTransaction.
33.
Winfree, L.T., Jr., Griffiths, C.T., & Sellers, C.S. ( 1989). Social learning theory, drug use, and American Indian youths: A cross-cultural test. Justice Quarterly, 6, 395-417.
